Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashtonelijah

(340 posts)
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:46 PM Oct 2012

Conservatives getting crazier: If re-elected, impeach Obama for "treason" over Benghazi

Looks like they know they're losing. Some conservative crackpot has decided that Republicans should work to impeach Obama if he's re-elected:

http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/10/29/beyond-impeachment-benghazi/

These assholes have no intention of working for the American people after the election. These Tea Party and far right loons will try to push this impeachment narrative and hold Republicans in Congress hostage to their agenda.

We NEED the House and the Senate if we want to get anything done. These people have lost their shit.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives getting crazier: If re-elected, impeach Obama for "treason" over Benghazi (Original Post) ashtonelijah Oct 2012 OP
I wonder if Obama is the right guy abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #1
Obama doesn't need to destroy the Republicans aletier_v Oct 2012 #14
Bank on it NWHarkness Oct 2012 #2
They can impeach him 100,000 times, but it doesn't mean that the Senate will take action Panasonic Oct 2012 #12
right - the House can bring articles of impeachment up Cosmocat Oct 2012 #16
"These assholes have no intention of working for the American people after the election" Drale Oct 2012 #3
Ha! I really thought they were going to bring up the 'impeachment' doublethink Oct 2012 #4
Really? bamacrat Oct 2012 #5
This is one reason to hope Turbineguy Oct 2012 #6
Haaaaaaaa...... Swede Atlanta Oct 2012 #7
the good news is that they are now plotting their revenge. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #8
This pisses me off no end. 3,000 people died on Bush's watch but this is SO MUCH WORSE catbyte Oct 2012 #9
please please please try it maxsolomon Oct 2012 #10
Good Lord, I was just at the doctor's office and they had Fox News on. tanyev Oct 2012 #11
I honestly do not understand reflection Oct 2012 #20
Any Issue november3rd Oct 2012 #13
They'll find SOMETHING Cosmocat Oct 2012 #18
So when is Issa's impeachment trial? tarheelsunc Oct 2012 #15
The whole machine seemed primed to spring into action lolly Oct 2012 #17
then can we throw Bush and Cheney in jail for doing nothing about 9/11?? nt progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #19
Oh no, that would be PARTISAN you know. BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #23
If they do they lose House in 2014. eom ncteechur Oct 2012 #21
I've heard that, too. BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #22

abumbyanyothername

(2,711 posts)
1. I wonder if Obama is the right guy
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:49 PM
Oct 2012

to take full advantage of this opportunity to destroy the Republican Party as we know it.

He might just be too nice for the job.

aletier_v

(1,773 posts)
14. Obama doesn't need to destroy the Republicans
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:55 PM
Oct 2012

All he needs to do is keep repeating,

"Please proceed, Governor"

NWHarkness

(3,290 posts)
2. Bank on it
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:49 PM
Oct 2012

If Obama is reelected and the GOP holds the House, they will impeach him. That's a given, as far as I'm concerned. But they will just make fools of themselves doing it, as with Clinton, and like that situation, it will lead to big Dem gains in the midterms.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
12. They can impeach him 100,000 times, but it doesn't mean that the Senate will take action
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:52 PM
Oct 2012

and with Reid as the bulldog bearer, he should not even bring it up at all.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
16. right - the House can bring articles of impeachment up
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:58 PM
Oct 2012

but the Senate is where the actual impeachment hearings would occur.

That being said, I fully expect the House to be raging dicks for the next two years, at least.

Drale

(7,932 posts)
3. "These assholes have no intention of working for the American people after the election"
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:50 PM
Oct 2012

They haven't worked for us in 35 years at least, why do you think they would now? Google Darrell Issa and look at all the crap he's either "investigated" or said he's going to investigate, including President Obama.

doublethink

(6,823 posts)
4. Ha! I really thought they were going to bring up the 'impeachment'
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:50 PM
Oct 2012

word before the election. Guess I was right. They are so predictable in their fake outrage over this created 'story' by Faux News.

bamacrat

(3,867 posts)
5. Really?
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:53 PM
Oct 2012

Yet if we even suggested the Bush administration messed up we are traitors and shitty American's for question the divine authority of the president. This is total bullshit. Let them try can you imagine the utter outrage in this country. Hell, I think even a majority of people who will vote for Romney would call this stupid.

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
6. This is one reason to hope
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:58 PM
Oct 2012

Romney gets in. These morons will not rest until they lose their jobs, their homes, their cars, their pensions, their beltbuckles and find themselves standing at a freeway offramp with a cardboard sign that reads, "Obama did this to me!"

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
7. Haaaaaaaa......
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:00 PM
Oct 2012

There is no conceivable basis for impeaching or holding for "treason" the current president of the U.S. over the events in Libya.

These guys and gals pull this shit out of their asses...... and good luck to them with their internal hatred.

I hate to say it but if a few blow the gasket and pass on, I will not remorse their loss.

I'm not being mean but just saying if I have people that are so hateful then I really don't mind them moving on to their lives in hell or a graveyard. The world has benefited from the event.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
8. the good news is that they are now plotting their revenge.
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:01 PM
Oct 2012

it is starting to sink in that this election is not going their way.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
10. please please please try it
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:45 PM
Oct 2012

divide the country further, tarnish your brand further. lose the house in 2014. the backlash cometh.

tanyev

(42,564 posts)
11. Good Lord, I was just at the doctor's office and they had Fox News on.
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:47 PM
Oct 2012

A giant storm bearing down on them, and all they can blather on about is Benghazi. I think I even heard someone say something about Obama using the storm to avoid the Benghazi issue.


reflection

(6,286 posts)
20. I honestly do not understand
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 07:39 PM
Oct 2012

their obsession with Benghazi. It's so... surreal. Like Groundhog Day playing out, but with people dumber than actual groundhogs.

 

november3rd

(1,113 posts)
13. Any Issue
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:53 PM
Oct 2012

They've just been looking for some issue they can seize upon and inflate into a Whitewater that their noise machine can use to cast aspersions on the Administration and spoil Obama's second term.

lolly

(3,248 posts)
17. The whole machine seemed primed to spring into action
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:59 PM
Oct 2012

As others have pointed out, the Romney campaign was hoping for just such an opening:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/18/1146402/-New-Revelation-At-47-Dinner-Romney-Was-Hoping-For-Something-Like-Iran-Hostage-Crisis-VIDEO

" As you watch the video, notice the man (is that a British accent?) asking Romney how he can “duplicate” an Iran hostage type scenario. Instead of dismissing the question as going against American interests, Romney agrees that the strategy would be beneficial. The entire video is worth a listen but at the end, Romney says, “if something of that nature presents itself, I will work to take advantage of the opportunity.”"


Once they had the pretext, they set the pre-fab outrage machine in motion.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
22. I've heard that, too.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 02:21 PM
Oct 2012

They're thinking this will be a repeat of 1972-73, when Nixon won re-election (by a huge margin) despite the fact a marginal backpage story concerning Watergate was slowly creeping its way up to the front page. Then, right after the election, the story exploded full-steam. Nixon may not have resigned until the second half of 1974, but 1973 was really the year Nixon came apart.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Conservatives getting cra...