Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 05:56 PM Oct 2012

Mitt Romney's Terrifying Plans for FEMA and Disaster Relief

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/mitt-romneys-terrifying-plans-fema-and-disaster-relief


Mitt Romney's Terrifying Plans for FEMA and Disaster Relief
If Hurricane Sandy was bearing down under a Romney-Ryan presidency, the scale of federal help would be radically different.
October 29, 2012


snip//

At a CNN debate last year during the Republican primary, Romney was asked by moderator John King about federal disaster relief. Romney responded by saying, “every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction.” Romney also added that “if you can go even further, and send it back to the private sector, that's even better.” As Mother Jones ’ Tim Murphy notes , this plan would “diminish the {Federal Emergency Management Agency’s} role and leave responsibility for helping imperiled Americans to the states.”

But it’s not only the candidate’s words that indicate how a Romney presidency would deal with disasters like Hurricane Sandy. The Romney-Ryan plan on paper sounds just as bad.

As Mother Jones reported last August , the Ryan budget plan would impede “FEMA's ability to respond quickly and effectively to natural disasters.” How, exactly? According to the non-partisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ryan budget means that “the costs for things like emergency management would have to be passed on to the states—which, with just a few exceptions, are currently in an even tighter financial bind than Washington.”

“FEMA also helps states and local governments repair or replace public facilities and infrastructure, which often is not insured," according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "This form of discretionary federal aid would be subject to cuts under the Ryan budget. If it were scaled back substantially, states and localities would need to bear a larger share of the costs of disaster response and recovery, or attempt to make do with less during difficult times."


Both Romney and Ryan have also “publicly demanded that the federal government only disburse disaster relief funding if Congress agreed to offsetting budget cuts elsewhere,” as Think Progress notes. “This would hold desperately-needed disaster relief funding hostage unless Congress agreed to cuts elsewhere in the budget, an extraordinarily difficult prospect even in normal circumstances.” Think Progress also reports that this position is a long-standing one for Ryan.

“Long before he entered the political limelight, Ryan was still pushing a similar line on disaster funding. In a March 23, 2004 speech on the House floor, Ryan proposed that any emergency spending legislation, including disaster relief, be automatically offset by an ‘across-the-board’ budget cut,” Think Progress ’ Scott Keyes writes.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney's Terrifying Plans for FEMA and Disaster Relief (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2012 OP
Just when our disasters are getting bigger and bigger, Romney wants LisaL Oct 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mitt Romney's Terrifying ...