Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 08:37 AM Oct 2012

Economics question: Given all the wealth that just went poof, or washed into the Atlantic,

is it now OK to print and distribute the equivalent amount of cash to rebuild it all?

I can't see how that would cause inflation, a long as it is used only to rebuild.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economics question: Given all the wealth that just went poof, or washed into the Atlantic, (Original Post) bemildred Oct 2012 OP
If you pay people to rebuild it all, and hopefully more of the infrastructure lunatica Oct 2012 #1
I've heard estimates of $40B. That will stimulate the economy. politicaljunkie41910 Oct 2012 #2
I think it will be a lot more than that. bemildred Oct 2012 #5
Yes...it will not create inflation because your creating a demand or supply bubble hoosierlib Oct 2012 #3
insurance my friend hockeynut57 Oct 2012 #4
They will try, I have doubts they can handle it. bemildred Oct 2012 #6
and i bet premiums skyrocketed for you. hockeynut57 Oct 2012 #7
Sort of. bemildred Oct 2012 #10
How Smart Is It modrepub Oct 2012 #8
But you know they will. nt bemildred Oct 2012 #9

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
1. If you pay people to rebuild it all, and hopefully more of the infrastructure
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 08:59 AM
Oct 2012

they will spend the money buying things. What do you think?

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
2. I've heard estimates of $40B. That will stimulate the economy.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:06 AM
Oct 2012

It will also get the conversation going again on the state of our nation's infrastructure which up until now has been subjected to a bandaid approach rather than working on a cure for a 21st century economy.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
5. I think it will be a lot more than that.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:16 AM
Oct 2012

That is some very expensive real estate, and some very expensive infrastructure, and a billion ain't what it use to be. But until they look it over, nobody is going to say, so we'll have to wait and see.

But yeah, that's the principle, the argument.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
6. They will try, I have doubts they can handle it.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:18 AM
Oct 2012

I remember the big quake out here in the 90s. They were in stunned disarray.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
10. Sort of.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:29 AM
Oct 2012

We have a state mandated program, which costs about the same as normal homeowners, specific to earthquakes, and leaves you on the hook for 15% or so of quake damage. And the InsCos hate even offering that.

The problems is big disasters clean them out, and they hate being cleaned out, they like the steady uinterrupted flow of the money river, with just enough going back to policyholders to look nice.

Edit: to be clear, the InsCos here refused to provide quake insurance after, and were made to offer what we have by law.

modrepub

(3,495 posts)
8. How Smart Is It
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:24 AM
Oct 2012

to rebuild your house or business on islands that are destined to be hit by another storm or washed away in the next several decades due to rising sea levels from global warming? At some point the (private) insurance companies are going to walk away and we the tax payer are going to have to cover the insurance for these people.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Economics question: Give...