Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 02:28 PM Oct 2012

NYT's Justin Levitt: The Danger of Voter Fraud Vigilantes

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/29/the-danger-of-voter-fraud-vigilantes/


In 2008, Montana was the canary in the coal mine. About a month before the election, a local citizen named Jacob Eaton formally challenged Kevin Furey’s voter registration, swearing that he was no longer eligible to vote. Furey had asked the post office to change his address from Helena to Missoula. Eaton asked local election officials to take Furey off the Helena rolls.

Eaton did not, presumably, know that his target was 1st Lieutenant Kevin Furey, an Army Reserve officer deploying to Iraq. Lt. Furey had asked the post office to send his mail to his mother in Missoula while he was overseas. His legal residence never left Helena, and his right to vote there never changed. Had the challenge succeeded while he was deployed, Lt. Furey would have lost the chance to vote for his own commander in chief.

Lt. Furey was not alone. Amateur “sleuths” challenged the voting rights of more than 6,000 other Montanans, based on a blunderbuss attempt to scan data records for ostensibly suspicious activity. When something looked suspicious (to them), they asked officials to cancel the offending registrations. In Montana, the challengers looked for postal records that didn’t match the voter rolls; other amateur detectives deployed different variations elsewhere.

The mass challenges were predictably replete with error. In Montana, they included a challenge to a woman whose address was listed as “905 S 5th St W,” on one set of records and “905 S 5th St W” on another. Can’t see the difference? The comma after her street address had apparently triggered the challenge because one address did not “match” the other. It took a federal lawsuit to shut the challenge down.




True the Vote" and other shady groups are using tactics like this today to steal our elections. Some other examples of reasons people are being disenfranchised include:

People listed as dead aren’t dead.
People listed as moving haven’t moved.
People listed as noncitizens aren’t noncitizens.
People listed with disenfranchising convictions haven’t been convicted of disenfranchising crimes.
Eligible citizens on the rolls are mistaken for people who are ineligible.

These aren't "mistakes". Anyone who thinks they are is either complicit or an idiot.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT's Justin Levitt: The...