Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,091 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 09:22 AM May 2016

The Progressive Case For Hillary Clinton Isn’t Much of a Case At All


The Progressive Case For Hillary Clinton Isn’t Much of a Case At All
A recent argument for Clinton from the left fails to convince.

BY Douglas Williams


(In These Times) In a recent issue of In These Times, Sady Doyle made “A Progressive Case for Hillary Clinton.” That such a case could be made might come as a surprise to many progressives, considering that Hillary Clinton has, for instance, derided single-payer healthcare as something that will “never, ever come to pass,” and has poohed-poohed calls for free public higher education by stating that students need more “skin in the game.”

Still, it’s worth asking: Does Doyle’s case hold up under scrutiny? Let’s take a look.

Has sexism influenced assessments of Hillary Clinton?

Doyle spends the first third of her piece arguing that “it is impossible to analyze Clinton—her policies, her career path, her hair—without understanding how gender bias operates,” and that “as progressives, it is our duty to resist these stereotypes, and, if we are journalists, to help our readers understand how gender bias operates at an unconscious level.”

It is true that we all have biases, and it is undoubtedly true that there are many, many people who have made sexist statements about Hillary Clinton’s candidacy—it’s been a central trope of the Right’s attempt to discredit her for more than two decades now.

But aside from the fact that pointing out and condemning such sexism, while important, does not constitute a progressive case for Clinton, there are two problems with this argument.

The first issue is with the research cited. Doyle references a 2010 study from Yale School of Management professors Tyler Okimoto and Victoria Brescoll which found that women who seek to gain political power can elicit negative reactions due to their deviation from the expectation that women exhibit more “communal” traits, such as warmth and comfort. But a 2013 methodological study by Kathleen Dolan found that surveys and experiments that ask people about support for female politicians in the abstract or about hypothetical candidates—like the study that Doyle cites, which constructed fictional state senators—do not get at the question of the role that gender plays in vote choice. ....................(more)

http://inthesetimes.com/article/19118/the-progressive-case-for-hillary-clinton-isnt-much-of-a-case-at-all




11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Progressive Case For Hillary Clinton Isn’t Much of a Case At All (Original Post) marmar May 2016 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #1
So glad you like us blacks. marmar May 2016 #3
You obviously haven't read TPP or an analysis of what it does farleftlib May 2016 #4
My decision remains clear.... FarPoint May 2016 #2
Progressive? My tushie pdsimdars May 2016 #5
+1 vintx May 2016 #6
nice chart J_J_ May 2016 #8
She's not a progressive. Ferd Berfel May 2016 #7
A must read for all of us. She is not a progressive. jwirr May 2016 #9
First paragraph shows this is not a serious critique. Sparkly May 2016 #10
who is this Sady Doyle twerp anyway? MisterP May 2016 #11

Response to marmar (Original post)

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
4. You obviously haven't read TPP or an analysis of what it does
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:33 AM
May 2016

The TPP makes it easier to offshore jobs and pushes down wages for jobs that remain here.

https://www.citizen.org/documents/analysis-tpp-text-november-2015.pdf

FarPoint

(12,444 posts)
2. My decision remains clear....
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:18 AM
May 2016

I support Hillary Clinton for President...she has my vote. That said as a Progressive.

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
10. First paragraph shows this is not a serious critique.
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

It mischaracterizes her positions on universal healthcare and on public higher education.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Progressive Case For ...