Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,401 posts)
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:42 AM May 2016

‘A capacity to move voters’: Will California be Bernie Sanders’ golden state?



(snip)

Nobody appears to have told Sanders. The Vermont senator has set a punishing pace in California: in the last week alone he addressed crowds in National City, Vista, Irvine, Santa Monica, Anaheim, East Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Cathedral City, Lancaster, Ventura, San Pedro, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Pomona, Bakersfield, Fresno and Visalia.

Sanders has outspent Clinton on advertising and his ground game is strong; he has more than 55,000 volunteers in the state who have made more than two million phone calls, according to the campaign.


(snip)

Few attendees at Sanders rallies – least of all Sanders – seem the least bit phased. He is clearly having fun, eagerly accepting Donald Trump’s challenge to debate him, a challenge the Republican hastily walked back , to avoid facing the 74-year-old former mayor of Burlington, Vermont mano-a-mano.

(snip)

“This kind of intensive campaigning by the senator, it really does move a lot of voters,” he said, pointing to the Michigan primary, which Sanders won despite being 10 points behind just a week before the vote. “He has the capacity to move voters just by his presence at these large events.”

Sanders’ energetic campaigning is certainly paying dividends. Recent polling shows Clinton’s lead in California – a state she won against Barack Obama in 2008 – is dwindling, with Sanders well within the margin for error, trailing by just 2% .

California’s primary is open, which means independents can vote. In other states, such voters have favored Sanders over Clinton, There have also been 1.5 million new registered voters, many under 30, a demographic Sanders has won elsewhere by enormous margins.


(snip)

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/a-capacity-to-move-voters-will-california-be-bernie-sanders-golden-state/


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
1. Will California be Bernie Sanders’ golden state? No
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:45 AM
May 2016

It may be close, he might even win ... but for him to win the nomination, BS would have to win California by like 50% or maybe more ... and that's just not going to happen.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
2. they are still including the Supers in the count
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

saying "Clinton will likely have reached the 2,383 delegates required for the nomination before California’s results even begin to come in"

No she won't!!! The supers don't vote until the convention - I wish they stop this shit!!

Demsrule86

(68,637 posts)
3. Once she has more than half the pledged delegates
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

they commit to that candidate...for example, 60 delegates committed to Obama in 08...you all don't get how it is done...Berner made some sort of deal...he is out after California..or DC.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
5. "Communications Director for DNC tells CNN to STOP counting Superdelegates in totals"
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:02 PM
May 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512078890

because they haven't voted yet! And they can change their mind at the Convention.

Got it?! Or don't get it. Argue all you want. But this is the 2nd person from the DNC that has said to stop including superdelegates in the candidates totals because they haven't voted yet. The first person was DWS herself.


Sam

Joob

(1,065 posts)
7. 2,383 is a count for pledged delegates. One Democratic would assume.
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:06 PM
May 2016

If it's not. All hell breaks lose.

I don't think it is.

I say whoever has more pledged delegates seems fair. If it's a fair system.

Doesn't make sense otherwise. Sorry, I'm a first time voter, just giving my first impression on what I've learned.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
8. If the supers go to the candidate with the most pledged delegates, they're useless
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:28 PM
May 2016

if they go to the candidate that doesn't have the most pledged delegates, then they're undemocratic.

Given the possible outcomes, why exactly do we bother with "super" delegates?

lmbradford

(517 posts)
4. Its the only thing they have got
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

Look at those cities turnouts, look at all the money he spent, look at him going strong. They cant report that it is 53-47%. That would not counter his good argument enough.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
6. Bernie Sanders' vigor and enthusiam puts us all to shame, doesn't he, Uncle Joe
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:06 PM
May 2016

I can't wait until I am 74 so I can do all that!

I feel excited about California. Thanks so much for posting this, Uncle Joe.

Sam

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
11. I think California is basically Bernie Sanders country
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:35 AM
May 2016

but the opposition will pull out the stops to screw things up for him and his campaign should stay alert and ready.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»‘A capacity to move voter...