2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSusan Sarandon: Hillary Clinton “more dangerous” than Donald Trump
Speaking with The Young Turks Politics Reporter Jordan Chariton in California, Sarandon made clear that she believed because of the lack of media scrutiny placed on Clintons record, she viewed Clinton as actually more dangerous than the blustery strong-man running on the Republican ticket.
I believe in a way she is more dangerous, Sarandon suggested without mentioning Trumps name, after Chariton asked her why Clintons foreign policy went largely unchallenged during the Democratic primary.
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/susan_sarandon_hillary_clinton_more_dangerous_than_donald_trump/
Tal Vez
(660 posts)MFM008
(19,827 posts)From her is "toucha toucha toucha me I wanna be dirty...."
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)nothing other than
a gratuitous war
the loss of a 15+ year earlier start on addressing climate change
forgive me if I don't think much of sarandon's guidance or judgment
onehandle
(51,122 posts)madaboutharry
(40,245 posts)It is also disingenuous. If the nation sinks into social and economic crisis due to Trump becoming president, a multi-millionaire movie actor would be very insulated from the ensuing chaos.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Tarc
(10,478 posts)The people that serve Susan Sarandon coffee, service Susan Sarandon's vehicles, clean Susan Sarandon's McMansions, prepare Susan Sarandon's hotel suites, and so on, however, are the ones that would suffer under a Trump presidency.
People who vote for candidates on the sole basis of what the candidate can do for them rather than what the candidate can do for one's fellow Americans are the epitome of ego-drive navel-gazers.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Poor thing.
tandot
(6,671 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)madaboutharry
(40,245 posts)Thanks.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Response to RandySF (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,838 posts)Deal with it, and at least attempt to understand.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2119633
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"Now Donald is sometimes unsavory, OK. But you know what? He actually just might get us a raise for once.." Um, Trump opposes the min. wage. Trump support has no place here.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:20 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hide the post and hide the poster, too. This is rooting for the opposition. No room for this shit on DU. None. Boot his ass out of here and back to wherever he came from.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The trolling is strong with this one.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous alert
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: "Trump support has no place here." I agree.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Sorry, I am not going to vote to leave this positive post for the Trumpster.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Endorsing Trump? Really? Begone.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Should have been 7-0 according to the TOS. Pretty obvious.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Ilsa
(61,710 posts)Hug her and shake her and ask her to please STFU.
She needs to stop this crap.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Demsrule86
(68,768 posts)now wants Trump...Susan is dead to me ...like the greens.
yardwork
(61,748 posts)Demnorth
(68 posts)I don't know how this works, but this makes two actresses who aren't very good reps for their candidate.
madaboutharry
(40,245 posts)RandySF
(59,614 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)We know Clinton is going to continue the current wars, and appears eager to start new ones in addition. Trump is less predictable, but the worst-case scenario is no worse that what we know with certainty Clinton will do.
RandySF
(59,614 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...added Libya and Syria, largely continued Bush's tax cuts, allowed BP to poison the Gulf of Mexico, allowed frackers to poison water, and many other horrible Bush policies. The Left is quite justified in being pissed off at the corporatist Dems for being near-clones of Republicans. The establishment has ignored the Left for so long, little did the realize the level of discontent. When they finally responded, it was insults and condescension. They've blown their chance now. Fuck 'em.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Obama ended the Iraq occupation, and the war in Syria is not one that Americans are fighting. Nor is it one that Obama somehow started. And you think that Obama somehow "allowed" BP's already existing oil well to burst? Are you kidding me?
I take it then that you were one of the people who thought there was no difference between Bush and Gore in 2000? If so, then you share some of the blame for Iraq.
tavernier
(12,410 posts)stupid opinion.
Bleacher Creature
(11,258 posts)In my view, anyone who says something like that should never be taken seriously again.
okasha
(11,573 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Hillary has already proven it as Senator and Secretary of State. Trump just talks a good game. They both suck ass but Hillary puts other people's money where her mouth is.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Yes just another tax and spend liberal
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)My point was she takes the donor money and does their bidding.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)Trump isn't a disaster, but because Hillary is such an effective part of the destructive machinery that is our corporatocracy. Trump won't be popular. He won't be subtle. His stupid is out there for all of us to see. He will be fought and humiliated at every turn. Hillary? She'll be fought at every turn on bullshit like Bengazi, while she colludes with the banksters, prison lobbies, and just about every other big money industry on the shit that matters, and nobody will breathe a word about that stuff.
I know you guys love to jump on these sorts of comments because on the surface they can be made to sound so absurd, but I wish you would bother to explore beyond the surface. But I don't expect you to examine her assertion, certainly not for the sake of soundly refuting it, because piling on about the crazy lady is more your speed.
But hey, if anybody has something substantive to say, I'll listen!