2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNow I really want Bernie to take this to the Convention. No party unity after this last trick.
The complicity starting before the 1st Primary vote was cast, having the Super Delegates signed up to Hillary Clinton, media blackout of Bernie Sanders, total DNC backing of Hillary Clinton, debates scheduled during time slots to get the least amount of viewership and all of the shenanigans during the Primaries.......Now this.
Not even touching on all of the crap that Hillary Clinton would bring raining down on this country with the issues hanging over her head.
This is the last straw.......no toothpick. No way Hillary Clinton.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And less than 1/3 Indies. The BoB movement is gaining momentum...Clintons dishonesty numbers are even worse than Trumps, most registered voters dislike her. That's even before FBI report gets released. The silver lining is that the November bloodbath will be the end of HRH and DWS's careers, and a major black eye to corporate Dems.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And ordinarily, sny candidate would trounce Trump (as Ssnders does), but Clinton struggles as her dishonest numbers are even higher than Trumps. She'll lack legitimacy, and the GOP will begin impeachment hearings as soon as Congress is sworn in, and we don't give a shit. First husband/wife impeachments will be s black mark borne by Clintons and Democrats throughout history...just like Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Shame
bvf
(6,604 posts)Probably the same guy responsible for all those hand-lettered signs on shop doors reading, "We r 'close'd' "
GoldenThunder
(300 posts)They're completely blind to the fact that Hillary is a flat-out terrible candidate.
bvf
(6,604 posts)A lot of them seem to view it through some high school student council lens, where the worst that might happen is that they won't be able to eliminate Saturday detentions after all.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)"conspiracy, left wing." There's plenty of discussion and plenty of studies have been done. Turns out the far left and right are also similar in a certain tendency to sometimes suspect inimical conspiracies instead of accepting facts that don't fit their picture of events.
This article is about this problem in Europe, grabbed to avoid political examples too close to home, but also because it points out that this could be a threat to our own democracy.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/18/conspiracy-theories-extreme-right-far-left-threaten-democracy
... This is the things-arent-what-they-seem school of thought. Nothing new perhaps. But what has become most striking is the degree to which conspiracy theories now abound in the political arena. This is one of the most striking features of the rise of the new populist or insurgent parties across Europe and beyond. The role of conspiracy theories is worth dwelling on because it points to some of the difficulties of representative, liberal democracies today.
This us versus them talk is not confined to the French far-right. It is a thread that runs through just about all populist, demagogic movements. ... What counts is that the traditional rules of the political game are questioned and the legitimacy of representative democracy is put into doubt. ... Part of the appeal of conspiracy theories is their simplicity. In a complex, changing world, it is tempting to reduce multifaceted issues to the us-and-them narrative. It is a vision that meets little contradiction because reasoned facts are sidelined by emotion. It is a binary scheme, with the people on one side and the system on the other.
The people are assaulted by plots prepared from inside the system, which can be domestic (state institutions, traditional parties) or foreign (the EU, financial markets, the Bilderberg group ... the list is long). It also thrives on the notion that a charismatic leader embodies the will of the people, who will ideally be consulted through online votes or public gatherings. This is where the weakening of representative democracy sets in.
This is from a more clinical article:
lol.........
Can't even spell our current Democratic President's name....
and he is going to lecture us on politics.
You can't make this shit up.
SCantiGOP
(14,318 posts)And attack and try to humiliate someone for a simple misspelling. That's certainly not very kind of these posters who are so concerned about the betterment of mankind.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Clinton falls far short in both demographics. She's the most divisive and disliked candidate the Democratic Party has ever fielded.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They still think Clinton will get millenial and indie votes like Obama, and that Sanders can give a speech or two and all his supporters will vote for Herself. theres no shortage of ignorance in Castle Bansalot...good illustration of living in a bubble. When reality smacks them it'll be painful.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)by 5 points in 2012.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)though. Hillary Clinton will rain all of her problems and scandals on the American people grid locking the functioning of our Government.
.
BTW. The Republicans chose Donald Trump. Those voters won too! The people that did not vote for Donald Trump may have suffered sour grapes as well and the Trump supporters probably forgave them their trespasses too!
You Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump supporters enjoy your shallow victories while you can because your choices are going to come back and bite you.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)BoB is gaining momentum....and Hillary and her supporters are helping.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)GRhodes
(162 posts)that's tied with the most unpopular major party nominee in polling history, the one with historically bad net favorables and now trusted less than a serial liar. She is the likely nominee, and your tone deaf arrogance is suicidal, especially given how horribly she's polling.
840high
(17,196 posts)never vote for her. There are many like me.
chwaliszewski
(1,528 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)think that Hillary is the best candidate. The majority of Democrat and the majority of Republican voters both have something in common, they both chose the wrong candidate.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)You may yet come to regret your childish triumphalism.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Faux pas
(15,471 posts)democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)I've never seen supporters of a winning candidate be so bitter about the primaries. I certainly wasn't in 2008.
Rockyj
(538 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)More Sanders supporters say they will vote for Hillary than Hillary supporters said they would vote for Obama in 2008
And you know how that turned out.
stopbush
(24,633 posts)First, Hillary has won 55% of Dem votes.
Second, 85-90% of Ds supporting Sanders say they will vote for Hillary.
Third, the BoB movement consists of no more than 5% of Ds.
Fourth, Indies have never and will never be a deciding factor in elections. They break down equally along partisan lines and are predisposed to vote for a D or an R. Ergo, Indies are a meaningless wash.
Fifth, many Rs will vote for Hillary or not vote for Trump.
Sixth, Trumps negatives are sky high among significant voting blocks that DO decide elections.
You can delude yourself into believing that you and your ilk can deny Hillary the presidency, but you can't. You really can't.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But please cling to them...it'll make Nov all that much more shocking and painful.
Response to stopbush (Reply #39)
Name removed Message auto-removed
stopbush
(24,633 posts)not matter what the dead-enders believe.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)She'll win the votes of the vast majority of Sanders supporters.
Trump will otherwise be your president too.
The butt it hurts.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)You'll be very lucky to get ANY majority of Sanders supporters votes....a "vast majority" is laughable.
musicblind
(4,562 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Heckuva job, Brownie! You'll yet be able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)You're going to let anonymous people on the internet sway your vote? Does that seem like an intelligent, reasoned response to your candidate losing?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But you go on and insult Sanders supporters. I'm sure BoB appreciates all you do to build their momentum. Maybe they'll even give you a plaque.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Where is the insult? If me asking if anonymous posters on the internet is the way to make a decision is an insult, too bad.
840high
(17,196 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,528 posts)EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)BoBers are fucking idiots. Bernie lost. NT
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2144495
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Personal attacks like this are rude and over-the-top.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:54 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not a personal attack by DU standards, no one was mentioned or singled out. A little extremely worded, but not hideable.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hide. Next time try something like "Bernie supporters should support the nominee". Kindness is never wrong.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing wrong with attacking Democrats who are vowing not to vote for the nominee, in the process helping Trump to get elected. They are traitors.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It's time to knock that crap off.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Why just a half? Because it would take two of you to make an ass whole...
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)You forgot the 80% of BSers who will vote for Hillary. Only about 20% appear to not want to vote the Democratic candidate.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Don't count on ANY unification of ANY kind after the total history of this primary... WHAT DEMOCRACY?
Why it's an OLIGARCHY!!!
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)negative behavior.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)"WHAT DEMOCRACY?"
The majority of voters chose Hillary. Just because that fact pains you so doesn't mean it wasn't democratic.
No need to post the ridiculous "it was rigged " narrative. Nobody with two brain cells buys that crap.
But if it gives you goosebumps go right ahead.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Oh, that's right. Her opponent, as difficult as this may be to believe, actually has a slightly more abysmal approval rating.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)majority of voters, even those who apparently voted for her, simply don't trust her. And THAT should give the Hillarybots pause.
What has led me to despair this past year are all those who don't like Hillary and who totally mistrust her, but have bought into the total bullshit of her "electability". At best she barely beats Trump. At worst, the entire fools paradise of her in-home server and the shady dealings of the Clinton Foundation will come back to haunt her.
I won't vote for her. Pure and simple. I'm 67 years old, and I've voted too many times for the lesser of two evils. People tend to think that phrase means the lesser is a good choice. No. It's still choosing something evil. And I'm completely over that. If she wins, then her behavior in office won't be on me.
Do not be surprised when she starts more wars. Don't be even remotely shocked when she declares that because of those wars there really isn't enough money for Medicare or Social Security, and of course she'll declare Obama Care to be a failed experiment, and throw millions of people back on the tender mercies of the health insurers. Pre-existing conditions, anyone?
I'm old enough that I'll probably be grandfathered into Social Security, although I suppose I can kiss all future COLAs goodbye. I'm old enough to remember quite clearly before the COLAs. Living on a fixed income wasn't just a turn of phrase, it was a reality. And it will become so again.
I'm in exceptionally good health, and as much as I'd hate it, I could go back to work. I'll survive better than most.
So brace yourself. Don't know how old you are, but if you're under 50, kiss Medicare and Social Security goodbye. Plan on working until you die. Just as people did back before those two amazing programs. Plan on dying of something that could be cured, and not that expensively.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Seems many have forgotten what so many fought for! To us Democrats that remember and will never forget!
CrispyQ
(38,723 posts)& with every election the democratic party shifts to the right. When does it stop?
Until the dem party embraces labor again, they don't represent me.
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)There was a poll about a week ago that showed the majority of Democratic voters wanted Bernie to stay in.
Many of you have been calling her the presumptive nominee since before the first vote was cast, so I don't see why you are so excited.
dchill
(40,902 posts)Repeatedly. But you know that.
TimPlo
(443 posts)hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/05/clintons-closing-argument-to-superdelegates/53314/
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/05/21/hillary-wrote-this-letter-to-superdelegates-in-2008-that-bernie-fans-may-find-interesting/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/clinton-in-2008-opposed-e_b_10245288.html
writes3000
(4,814 posts)But the real issue may be that you haven't been familiar with Dem primary rules. There will be no convention battle.
annavictorious
(934 posts)This sucks for her too.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)This is so typical Clinton. It is funny that ALL of this crap that happens always favours Clinton and she NEVER did anything. Oh brother.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,695 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)lmao!
Jesus! she's the smartest woman on the planet! She rigged every single primary that Bernie lost and no one can catch her doing it.
Y'all are being ridiculous.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)....maybe learn a few hard truths .
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)I love George but he's wrong on a few things, like not voting and then pretending you aren't responsible for what happens and that it affords you the right to bitch cuz it wasn't your fault. Nope.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)My first Presidential vote was Jimmy Carter. I was 21.
I have voted for Republican judges, back when there were sensible Republican judges on the local bench.
So anyone who wants to blame me for not getting out the vote, or not voting, I say they can go to hell. I've served my time. I was active in Democratic politics, was a delegate to the State Democratic Convention several times, and so were my parents.
My parents were part of a walk-out, rump convention and a fist fight (My dad got hit over the head by an old lady with her purse as he was trying to avoid being hit) at the State Democratic Convention in 1958. They were trying to get Henry B. Gonzalez nominated for Governor in 1958, a Mexican-American and long-time congressman from San Antonio. That was pretty radical for 1958. My father was a union organizer in the 1930s and 1940s. BEFORE we had any labor laws, thanks to Roosevelt.
So don't blame me for apathy. I have nobody at the state level that represents me. Absolutely nobody.
I refuse to feel guilty for not being active in politics. Because I HAVE been active in politics and it has done me no good. I am not represented.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)pretending HC is not progressive, that will help I'm sure.
Dont bother posting about how she's not progressive. Its a lie
gnite!
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Or as Thom Hartmann says on his show, The Clintons were the authors of NAFTA, CAFTA
and SHAFTA.
Disastrous trade deals for the American economy.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Hillary didn't have anything to do with it. AND the effect on jobs loss was minimal.
Its Reagan's baby later finished by Bush Sr who signed it . Clinton's sig at the beginning of his first term was ceremonial onl.
Does this idiot learn any actual history before opening that mighty mouth?
and exactly how does labor benefit without a trade deal ?
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Importing cheap Chinese crap from sweatshops in the name of greed and the race to the bottom.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)better without a trade agreement
How so? What would stop corporations from hiring ALL cheap labor from foreign countries
The TPP actually gives labor a minimum wage..how is that a bad thing?
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)The TPP means that any environmental or public health laws could be broken with impunity.
Dangerous or harmful products could be shipped here and consumed and make people sick.
Because the TPP overrides the laws of the countries that protect the public.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Talk to someone who knows more than they do.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)But it must have been choice to have "name removed" and "message removed" replacing it.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Ah the old ISDS premise..
ISDS stands for Investor State Dispute Settlement is about investment and not trade. The anti arbitration folks are scare-mongering about a entity that relates only to investment.
ISDS is already in dozens of BITs (bilateral investment treaties) between the United States and other countries, including those involved in the TPP negotiations. Multinational corporations can treaty shop for the best protections . Also, most favored nation clauses in each BIT allow investors to choose the best protections from almost any BIT.
Question: How many ISDS claims has the US lost?
Answer: ZERO
Why? Because the US has an advanced judicial, administrative and regulatory system that does not treat investors (foreign or domestic) unfairly, and when it does it compensates them under domestic US "takings" law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/takings
In fact the top 30 countries in the OECD Corruption Rankings a.k.a. the least-corrupt countries have lost never ISDS case, with the exception of Canada and provincial politics played a huge part in that.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...
Response to puffy socks (Reply #110)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Take off the tinfoil hat.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Skulking in the shadows, pulling all our strings, blackmailing everyone from Obama himself to the cleaning lady at the local Pity Mart! WE MUST OPEN OUR EYES AND SEE!!!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Wicked witch and all that shit.
840high
(17,196 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)thucythucy
(8,801 posts)says a poster who evidently joined DU for the entire and express purpose of bashing the leading and now presumptive Democratic candidate.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Mine just so happen to be a better choice but unfortunately, like the Republicans, choosing Trump, the Democrats are choosing Clinton. Nothing at all to brag about right now.
randome
(34,845 posts)smh.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
thucythucy
(8,801 posts)I just object to all the showboating, is all.
You've been against Clinton ever since your first post. So all this, "Now I'm REALLY not gonna support her" is laying it on a bit thick.
But have at it, if it makes you feel better.
BTW: I voted for Bernie in my primary.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)When politicians push heinous policy, and try to trick us by tacking a "D" after their names, it's important to call them out on it.
We did it for Zell Miller and Joe Liberman, it's also important to do it for Hillary.
Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)You don't have to like Hillary. Trump thanks you for the support.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)Get on board or get off. Your choice
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)the Democratic Party.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Bunch a fake Drmocrats...think cherry-picking one or two social issues makes them a 'progressive'....all it does is makes them George Bush in pantsuits.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)calguy
(5,803 posts)Sore losers like you in our ranks.
Or are you just trolling for Trump?
Which is it?
dubyadiprecession
(6,549 posts)Enough is enough, he should concede this race.
mac56
(17,637 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)It's not like you were ever going to get on board.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,695 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Not waiting until the convention to officially be done with this party.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,695 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...afterwhich will be a huge exodus from the party in Florida. People are fed up.
djean111
(14,255 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)family got together for Memorial Day Weekend, 9 of us, we talked and talked and talked about what to do... in the end we basically decided that this is the LAST election that we will be registered as Democrats.
My husband and I have been Democrats for about 40 years, I have a daughter & son who are both married and they too are Democrats AND there are 2 grand kids who can vote and are now Democrats.
We were together for 3 days and made our decision. AND this was BEFORE this latest stunt! Well, Bob Dylan comes to mind... The Times They Are A'Changin! I'm sick of being taken for granted and I know many more people who feel the same way. I haven't talked to them about this yet, but I DO KNOW how they feel about HER!!!
She just ain't liked AT ALL!
Jackilope
(819 posts)37 years of being a Democrat, this is final straw.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Party is to the right of where the Republicans were back then. It's going to be quite a relief to leave.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)NEVER Hillary
HillNO
Bernie Or Bust
At this point, I am just going to turn of the news, DU and anything to do with politics from the convention until the day after the GE.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Really, tonite should surprise no one. -ALL- of this was inevitable considering the plays being made.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,695 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)haha
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Demsrule86
(71,036 posts)He wants the primary over...called Bernie over the weekend...now Bernie is in a box.The primary is done. And that is a good thing. I doubt Hillary had a thing to do with it.
still_one
(96,925 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)Together in some way. People were beginning to accept the inevitable. This though just threw gas into a possible dying fire. Although I still think that Bernie Sanders is by far so much better for our country, I was hopeful that something positive would happen and there would be some type of coming together. Foolish me. I forgot. We are dealing with the Clintons. Leave nothing to chance.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)still_one
(96,925 posts)Clinton or Sanders benefit for this news.
Second, people who were going to vote in California will still vote in California. We have a lot of issues, and other offices on the ballot, than just the Presidential primary.
Third, both the Clinton and Sanders camps WANT their supporters to vote tomorrow, to demonstrate the support they have.
Should the AP have NOT released this until after the primaries on Tuesday, ABSOLUTELY, but they did what they did.
At least in California, anyone this morning who was going to vote tomorrow, will still be going to the polls to vote
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)that Hillary is 56% to Berni's 44% of the early voter totals in CA?
still_one
(96,925 posts)believe it is around 20%, though it increases every year. I have been voting by mail for years in California.
Assuming the 20% is correct, that means 80% is the rest.
The polls indicate those who were registered Democrats since the last election favor Hillary.
The polls also indicate that the newly registered voters favor Bernie.
The most accurate pollster in the state is the Field Poll, and they indicate a two point spread in the final result. California will NOT be a blowout for any of the Presidential primary nominees in my view
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Yes I agree. Everyone needs to get to the polls and vote. We can't take anything for granted. Nothing.
still_one
(96,925 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)One Black Sheep
(458 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,524 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)I have a VERY long memory, and this bullshit is something I will NOT soon forget.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)But it probably won't change anything. It's highly likely he will not be the nominee, and I don't think he should be unless he takes a lead in pledged delegates.
Hekate
(95,577 posts)A fistfight, anything. You know you want to.
Just recognize that Hillary Clinton doesn't want this premature news either.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Super delegates have been saying they'll support her for months.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Because those facts have an establishment bias.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)As well as other states primaries. Has she even reached the magic number yet?
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)takes the wind out of her sails, so you should be happy that it happened to her. She wanted to go over the top in delegates after NJ closed. This is not her doing, and shame on you for lying about her. She rejected the announcement on her site. By the way, if Bernie were declared the presumptive nominee tonight, you'd be jumping up and down and celebrating like there is no tomorrow. Bernie is a hypocrite and apparently so are a lot of his supporters. Maybe they get it from him.
Stuckinthebush
(11,055 posts)My god. Some think that she actually had a hand in this. Amazing.
NNadir
(34,932 posts)Have fun working for the Trump "Hillary is Satan" campaign.
You'll lose again.
Have a nice day tomorrow.
writes3000
(4,814 posts)Wrong.
NNadir
(34,932 posts)The tenor of the OP, and the "Hillary is Satan" posts I've seen here at DU convince me that I'm absolutely right.
Actions speak louder than words. (I note that last night Sanders was still on his "Clinton is a war monger," message. Sheesh.)
onenote
(44,863 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)using SD's to win the nomination was wrong and undemocratic, then when he couldn't win without them, all of a sudden they are wonderful and part of the process.
And you're right. Bernie did line up SD's before the primaries started. So did Obama. In this case it's only NOT OK if Hillary does it. It's the same as when Hillary gets donations from corporations she is corrupt and in their back pocket, but when Obama got donations from the same corporations, he was wonderful and would never be bought off. It's all phony hypocritical bullshit. Such is politics.
senz
(11,945 posts)onenote
(44,863 posts)I just pointed out that Sanders did the same thing.
So if there was something wrong with Clinton lining up SD support then I guess you agree there was something wrong with Sanders doing it too.
Gman
(24,780 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Refuse to endorse Clinton and lose a vote in front of a national TV audience?
Response to Seeinghope (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #103)
Post removed
Raine1967
(11,618 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)"I'm a superdelegate and I don't believe in superdelegates."
Demsrule86
(71,036 posts)She is the nominee. There is nothing he can do...except concede and endorse...make a nice speech and work on the platform with Obama hater West.
Tarc
(10,581 posts)Your hyperbole is absurd. If Bernie would have won the pledged delegates, then the supers...just as they did in 2008...would have flipped to him. Sanders fans keep using the superdelegates as a scapegoat for their own candidate's failures.
ecstatic
(34,572 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Replaced with coronation.
Hillary is Queen for A Day!
Whoever thought that old teevee show would make a reappearance??
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)held back 40 super delegates (per CNN reporting) which were scheduled to commit on Wednesday, just so that she wouldn't depress voter turnout tomorrow.
What you want - for your candidate to stay in - would actually be the best thing for party unity. By seeing Sanders become irrelevant and continue to insist that people pay attention to him, he will expose himself as just wanting attention and press. If it were just a matter of furthering his issues, he could better do that by leveraging his current influence with Hillary's campaign. Instead of riding off into the sunset as a hero, he will be seen slowly deteriorating in status and altruism. He will be exposed as the emperor with no clothes, and it will be much easier for his supporters to leave him without guilt.
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)I felt like the announcement tonight sort of stole her thunder and risked depressing her voter turnout as much as Bernie's. But it's also possible that her campaign gave the signal to those 40 superdelegates that it was ok to talk to the media once they realized they may not win California, in order to minimize the press coverage of the last 6 primaries, many of which Bernie may win.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)Hillary's campaign is that they didn't give instructions to the supers on what to say to the media if they were called.
musicblind
(4,562 posts)The reasoning is that her voters are the less passionate ones and therefore less likely to turn out if they think it's a done deal in their favor.
Claiming Clinton did this is naive. She was still likely to win California even though it would be very close, but now she will likely lose California. And she isn't dumb. She knew that and that is why she was holding superdelegates etc back from announcing support.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)its almost as if she is trying to lose.
senz
(11,945 posts)There is something fundamentally wrong with her.
Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)lack integrity and judgement. Says more about them than her.
jamese777
(546 posts)Trying to lose that is, since she won.
Primaries popular vote as of June 6th
Hillary Clinton: 13,297,176 (55.4%)
Bernie Sanders: 10,247,986 (42.7%)
Clinton over Sanders: 2,999,190
Hillary Clinton: 1,811 pledged delegates
Bernie Sanders: 1,526 pledged delegates
Hillary Clinton: 548 Superdelegates
Bernie Sanders: 46 Superdelegates
Hillary Clinton: 2,359 total delegates
Bernie Sanders: 1,572 total delegates
Hillary Clinton: 29 contests won
Bernie Sanders: 21 contests won
Hillary Clinton needs 24 delegates.
Bernie Sanders needs 811 delegates.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)To win the 2016 Democratic primary, a candidate must have 2,383 delegates.
As of June 6th, Hillary has 1,812 pledged delegates and Bernie has 1,526 pledged delegates. That's a difference of 286 delegates.
To reach 2,383 before the convention, Hillary would need 571 more pledged delegates and Bernie would need 857 more pledged delegates.
The states that vote tomorrow and the number of pledged delegates available from each:
CA -- 475
MT -- 21
NJ -- 126
NM -- 34
ND -- 18
SD -- 20
D.C. has 20 delegates and votes on June 14.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/
It is virtually impossible for either candidate to reach 2,383 pledged delegates from the remaining states. Therefore the superdelegate votes at the convention will decide the nomination.
The AP announced tonight that Hillary had "won," even though she hasn't. They made this announcement before the seven remaining primaries had been held. It will depress voter turnout and is an an act of sabotage.
BootinUp
(49,209 posts)a Trump Presidency.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Think again. 2 of the most distrusted politicians in the world? I don't see a problem with this.
MFM008
(20,016 posts)The guy who is head of elections for NBC said it doesn't matter what the candidates want. They make the calls, confirm the super delegates and make the call. They have done it that way for 32 years and that's what they do period.
Like many other things facts don't matter to some in here.
Number23
(24,544 posts)It's been even more cringe-inducing than usual today.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)You never did say what that "last straw" was.
Vinca
(51,356 posts)This is not a done deal. The key word is "presumptive." I'm a "presumptive" wealthy person. All I need is a lottery win. Chances are, Hillary is going to be the nominee no matter how much passion Bernie people have. But anything can happen. Nothing surprises me anymore in this election.
LexVegas
(6,616 posts)MaeScott
(902 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)Dem2
(8,178 posts)The fact that 114 people would rec this nonsense shows how unrealistic people on the internet.
Your user ID is pure irony.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Want to have a seat at the convention, but if you're not going to vote for Hillary why would would hillary waste time with letting bernie draft the platform.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Anything Bernie got to put in the platform would just be ignored anyway.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)same problem bernie has...
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I am tired of this bullshit.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)so confident in their power.
snort
(2,334 posts)of the old 'party unity' for me.
No worries about the door hitting my ass on the way out, I'm going to pull the motherfucker off its hinges.
Triana
(22,666 posts)The Dem Establishment/Oligarchy can court them - or become a much smaller less influential party with a minority of supporters vs 'unaffiliated' or 'independent'.
People are getting sick of this crap.
I hope Bernie Sanders sticks around a LONG time after this election to be a foil and a thorn in the side of the 1960s Republicans we now call "Democrats" - to remind them what ACTUAL Democratic principles are. Because they lost sight of them about 40 or so years ago. And the Clintons were part and parcel of that process.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)About what a New Deal Democrat is and how long it's been since anybody has seen one.
I agree.
tritsofme
(18,736 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)lined up 10 months before the 1st vote was placed circumvents the purpose for Super delegates, but hey who cares about what is ethical.
She had a worldwide recognisable name. Again before the 1st vote was cast she probably had 3 million supporters ready to vote. Her opponents were unknowns. The DNC was totally biased for Hillary Clinton. The media blacked out Bernie Sanders. The debates were strategically scheduled for viewing times that would get the least attention. Hillary Clinton had everything laid out for her. The shenanigans during the Primaries were just more examples of the help Hillary Clinton needed. The fact that after all of this Bernie Sanders "the unknown" got this close really says a lot about how weak Hillary Clinton is as a candidate.
The final Shenanigan was calling Hillary Clinton the Presumptive Nominee for the Democrats the day before the California..New Jersey.... Suppressing votes
This is plain bullshit and uncalled for, but then again much about Hillary Clinton has been b.s. And uncalled for.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... and yet still have the audacity to gloat about it.
Clinton was given every possible advantage, and yet it's still been a horse race.
It takes a special kind of candidate to blow that kind of lead.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)after Bill Clinton's don't ask don't tell betrayal and Hillary screwing up the whole health care reform thing.... I will NEVER trust or vote for a Clinton again..
snot
(10,901 posts)I mean literally nauseated, by any election before. The extent of the dirty tricks and bold-faced lies, eagerly abetted by the media, has shocked even me.