Huffpo: It's time to give it up,

[SmittynMo]

while you still have your dignity.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/clinton-should-concede-to-sanders-before-fbi-reveals-findings_b_9836720.html?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_1035078&

Key points:
Since “gross negligence” can be used to prosecute Clinton under the Espionage Act, and since convenience wasn’t the reason for owning a private server, indictments are likely. Also, if indictments become a reality, the fracture within the Democratic Party, caused by people who’d still vote for a candidate facing criminal indictment, would be irreparable. The rest of the world would either be laughing, or in disbelief, that Clinton decided to continue her campaign for the presidency (with supporters still loyal), even with the threat of jail time. Rest assured, even more Bernie supporters would refuse to vote for Clinton, if her campaign continued its quest for the White House, alongside criminal indictments.

Then there’s the likelihood of criminal charges. Every “legal scholar” or pundit defending Clinton assumes that merely convenience, or absent-mindedness, was the reason for a private server. Since there was almost certainly political utility involved in circumventing U.S. government networks, the DOJ has intent and motive to indict Clinton.

[riversedge]

1. 5 more days!!

[SmittynMo]

2. You're amazing!!!

You can predict when the FBI will be done with her? That's too friggin awesome. Thanks for the heads up

[stonecutter357]

5. tick tock..

[DemocratSinceBirth]

9. Clap harder.

But then there was a moment where former Governor Weld shattered Republican dreams and Donald Trump's talking points about Hillary Clinton's email.

Weld changed the topic they were discussing and brought up the whole Hillary email hoo-ha, telling Chuck Todd it is going nowhere. When pressed by Todd on why he thought so, Weld replied, "I'm speaking as a former director of the criminal division of the Justice Department. There's no criminal intent, and with no criminal intent there's no indictment."

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/05/libertarian-vp-candidate-blows-republicans

[charlyvi]

15. ^^^^^^THIS!^^^^^^

[kerry-is-my-prez]

35. I will listen to legal experts and insiders regarding this, not a gadfly with wishful thinking from

Huffington Post who is stubbornly stuck on Bernie Sanders.

[coco77]

17. In five days it these things can't be said on DU but..

You better believe these things will be said in many places. The main point is you can not change anyone's opinions or facts. The is is DU not the whole world. Now, just because many in our party have endorsed Hilllary they will not change many minds.

She may win the Presidency but it will be a day in and day out list of charges and alleigations.

I have been hearing her say she can take it but can the country take it.

[vdogg]

18. That's fine with me

Just tired of this crap being posted on DEMOCRATIC underground by supposed democrats. You can go over to freerepublic with this bs. Don't let the door hit ya on the way out.

[coco77]

19. Lol! So I am not a Democrat because I don't agree with Hillary?

Five more days On DU. And many more everywhere else until the election and you can't stop em..

[SmittynMo]

26. Probably more of a dem than you

The problem here is "oligarchy". Our democracy is all but gone. And you don't seem to get that, nor support a true democracy. So who's the "good democrat" here?

I just hope "all you oligarch supporters" realize that you will probably give Trump the victory, due to low voter turnout. Even the poster prior to you said she "may" win.

Do I want Clinton indicted? Of course not, but it's not looking good for her. And the oligarch establishment is all behind her. I'm guessing you can't see the rigging and corruption here.

[jack_krass]

37. LOL you guys are a riot!

[KPN]

40. Define Democrat.

[vdogg]

42. Someone who actually supports the democratic nominee in the general election

Instead of trying to sabotage her against her republican opponent simply because you didn't get your way. Someone who understands that there is actually a difference between our nominee and Trump, and realizes how devastating it would be to our nation if Trump gets anywhere close to the reins of power.

[KPN]

43. That's not a definition. You fail.

[vdogg]

44. Oh, it's mostly certainly a definition.

You may not like the definition, but it is one. I don't see how anyone who is actively campaigning against a political party, can then turn around and say they are part of that party. It doesn't make sense, simply doesn't add up.

[KPN]

45. Can't have it both ways vdogg.

You haven't defined what a democrat is. All you've done is stated a behavior and stipulated that behavior as a requirement.

I've been a Democrat for 44+ years (registered that is). I know what a Democrat is. Do you?

[NCTraveler]

20. Until Goodman goes back home to support Trump.

He is a ratfucker.

[BootinUp]

34. +1

[KPN]

39. But they'll be a fun 5 days!

Go Bernie!

Time top derail the Third-Way! The Party will only drift further to the right to fill the vacuum being left by the GOP's demise anyway. What's there to lose?!!

[stonecutter357]

3. more and more unhinged.

[SmittynMo]

6. Read the article

How can you deny what the real facts are?

[stonecutter357]

7. HA Loserman is full of shit ..

[Dr Hobbitstein]

12. Find me an example of HA Goodman EVER having the facts.

Pro-Tip: HA Goodman, the staunch Rand Paul supporter, has never been right about anything.

[leftofcool]

4. HA Loserman needs to look for another job quick!

[chillfactor]

8. soon Skinner's...

new policies go into effect and garbage like this post will not be allowed...YEAH!

[SmittynMo]

10. Garbage?

That's too funny. People only hear/read what they want to. Ignore the facts!!!!

[Dr Hobbitstein]

13. Twice you've mentioned facts re: HA Goodman.

I don't think it means what you think it means.

[charlyvi]

16. Yes you do!

Only hear/read what you want to. HAHA Goodman and facts are strangers to each other. No one that writes with the vitriol and hatred that he does can be considered fair and credible. Unhinged is more the word.

[pdsimdars]

24. Refute ONE thing he says, ONE fact he puts down. Let's hear it.

All you have is the personal attacks. The kind that Hillary supporters are so sensitive about. ironic.

[Lizzie Poppet]

31. Good luck with that.

Princess Weathervane's Ostrich Army is immune to your puny reason and facts!

[KPN]

41. Lol!!!! +1

I'm going to borrow that if you don't mind w/ minor mod:

"Princess Weathervane's Ostrich Army is immune to facts and reason!"

[Duval]

56. I'm going to borrow this!!

How apt a description!

[pdsimdars]

57. It is scary, the mindless rush to push Hillary.. . .for what?

[Lord Magus]

48. HAHA Goodman would have to put down a fact first in order for us to refute it. -nt-

[pinebox]

32. Refute the post. Go for it. We'll wait.

Go ahead, show us where he is wrong. The floor is yours.

[pdsimdars]

21. And people also used to burn the books they didn't like and didn't thing others should read

But that isn't something to be proud of. Proud of being uninformed. What kind of a democratic value is that?
This is real information and real facts. Get used to them!

[BobbyDrake]

11. Still touting the opinion of Rand Paul supporter HA Goodman? Why? He's a self-promoter who cares...

...about nothing more than raising his own profile, and driving page-clicks to his own content. "Click here to watch me talk about some fringe topic..." or "Follow this link to my appearance on some show..." or "Click here to read my endorsement of Rand Paul, because I'm such a fake progressive."

Goodman, Uygur, Reich. These are all left-wing versions of the same people who peddle books on Fox and Rush and Hannity. The Progressive Entertainment Complex has arisen, and they want your money.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

14. Uygur used to be a right wing Republican making 70 K a year as a corporate lawyer.

Ostensibly becoming a progressive and bashing Democrats from the left was a great career move. He's now making millions.

How easy it is to deceive those who want to be.

[pinebox]

33. Hillary was a Republican once and so was Warren. Your point?

[OnDoutside]

46. Bit obvious, isn't it ? In a 2 horse race, Uygur doesn't support the Democrat, therefore a traitor.

[pinebox]

47. Many people don't

[OnDoutside]

55. Indeed.

[TwilightZone]

51. 40 and 20 years ago, respectively. Got anything more relevant?

Uygur took $4m from a Republican to fund his show in 2014.

Goodman was supporting Rand Paul in this election cycle, barely a year ago.

[pdsimdars]

23. Ah, yes, so you have no rebuttal to his actual CONTENT, just the superficial, personal attacks.

You really have nothing to say apparently, or know nothing about what he is talking about or you might be able to refute something, But you don't. All you have is "attitude". Kind of a flimsy cover for your lack of content.

PS, yes, he is a bit over the top, but he UNDERSTANDS his content. Every person on earth has their idiosyncrasies, but he is smart and knows his shit. You, however, don't seem to, and all you have it the shallow personal attacks.

[geek tragedy]

22. 6 days. Happy trails. nt

[SmittynMo]

27. NFFS

Don't ask.

[geek tragedy]

29. .

[SmittynMo]

30. .

[Adrahil]

28. To be clear, that's HA HA Goodman, not really "Huffpo"

And Goodman has been fucking incredibly wrong the entire cycle, so it's hilarious that people are still posting his crap.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

36. To think that the Dem Party would allow a candidate about to be indicted be the nominee is naive.

There have been tons of legal experts and insiders who have said that it's not going to happen, not a person with cognitive dissonance.

[mcar]

38. I think I will miss HA HA

His stuff is comedy gold.

[Lord Magus]

49. It is indeed time to give it up.

The indictment fairy isn't coming, and no amount of bloviating from HAHA Goodman will change that.

[TwilightZone]

50. HA Goodman is not "HuffPo"

He's a hack who occasionally writes click-bait nonsense for them because they need more ad revenue.

[Thinkingabout]

52. How can one determine an article is useless, see HA Goodman's name attached.

[BigBearJohn]

53. Thanks for the link to the Huffpost article. I'll share with all my friends on Facebook. Excellent

[DemocratSinceBirth]

58. FOUR MORE DAYS

[Night Watchman]

59. Oy!

And I'm not even Jewish!