Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:42 PM Jun 2016

Why go to a rally, then not vote?

I am not getting that. the rallies weren't anything special. The one I went to (Sacramento Cal Expo, Bonnie Field) was hard to be at (security was especially harsh) and it seemed to me that you really had to want to be there. Not much in the way of music, no fireworks, just Bernie and a two second Danny Glover appearance, yet there were 20K people there. There were countless people registering people to vote at the event and they were doing a very brisk business. The crowd hardly skewed young, seemed a nice cross section of people, with young kids, pre-teens, as well as senior citizens (myself) and all kinds of people.

But now they say that those people, "the young people" that support Bernie at the rallies didn't vote? I don't get it. Going to the event is far more hassle than voting, especially if absentee voting, where you don't even have to turn off the video games to vote.

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why go to a rally, then not vote? (Original Post) ghostsinthemachine Jun 2016 OP
They *did* vote. It's just that their votes aren't being counted. No biggie. reformist2 Jun 2016 #1
I doubt that they voted. The youth vote is historically unreliable. redstateblues Jun 2016 #29
You keep spewing these falsehoods, even though multiple people have shown why your accusations still_one Jun 2016 #32
This. Our votes don't count! scscholar Jun 2016 #52
Bullshit. Their votes have been counted. It's just that rally-goers are a minority of voters. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #63
No I don't think that's it gollygee Jun 2016 #2
It's BS...as in bull shit not Bernie sanders. They voted. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #3
It would probably be more like the young people that went to the rallies also voted. brewens Jun 2016 #36
Indeed Jennylynn Jun 2016 #61
A rally is more like a party. Voting takes responsibility. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #4
Exactly! Rallies are group activities, voting is solitary. Hortensis Jun 2016 #27
Because it seems the focus was to establish what people think and not do something about it uponit7771 Jun 2016 #5
If we could vote by smartphone problem solved Skink Jun 2016 #6
How exactly do you plan on safeguarding that? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #12
Same way the banks do it Skink Jun 2016 #14
Banks get hacked all the time. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #15
And ballots get lost or tossed Skink Jun 2016 #18
Not 40 million at a time. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #21
That would put an end to online banking Skink Jun 2016 #24
So, you have never heard of Target, I guess. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #26
When you live and die by your smartphone and Facebook, you expect it in all aspects of life. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #28
That is the saddest thing I have ever read. Whimsey Jun 2016 #13
I voted early for Bernie. In the progressive state of Texas Skink Jun 2016 #16
I agree it needs to be easier. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #17
Vote by selfie. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #30
Depends on the state. HassleCat Jun 2016 #7
The AP called the election over the night before CA voted. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #8
If that prevents someone from supporting the candidate of their choice, that is sad. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #9
NY has a freeze on joining the Democratic party Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #23
NY published it and it was in the papers and news. People ignored it. Voting takes responsibility. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #34
So hillary voters knew she was going to win, and stayed home. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #37
Yes, but Clinton was leading with absentee ballots. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #45
I toddled on over to the polling place, where I drew a Democratic ballot and voted for Hillary... Hekate Jun 2016 #50
Going to a rally with your friends is fun...Voting is a solemn and solitary activity... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #10
There are several possibilities mythology Jun 2016 #11
Five more days! panader0 Jun 2016 #19
BSS are still in attack mode. redstateblues Jun 2016 #31
20,000 people per rally. How many rallies in CA? 20? Orangepeel Jun 2016 #20
For every person who attends a rally, there are 10 more that will vote for a candidate. reformist2 Jun 2016 #40
Right and Wrong KK9 Jun 2016 #49
rally - skip voting - create conspiracies/whine/toss chairs - threaten to skip GE - demand respect DrDan Jun 2016 #22
hillary did not get even one vote. bernie got them all and they were stolen. nt msongs Jun 2016 #25
This is actually not too far from the truth. reformist2 Jun 2016 #43
June 16. Tick tock. Hekate Jun 2016 #51
The sad thing is you actually believe that. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #65
Rallys are social events and theater. Not much different than going to hang out with your friends. qdouble Jun 2016 #33
Who said they didn't vote. They voted, it is just that there were more Hillary supporters still_one Jun 2016 #35
Actually, they may have done more good by attending the rally then by voting. anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #38
Sit on your assets, mail in your ballot. Easy, peasy. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #39
You know, they didn't "follow the rules". Many apparently NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #41
How do you know they didn't? Why is this assumption that is not based on facts repeated jillan Jun 2016 #42
20k people,sounds like a lot, but it's not really. MineralMan Jun 2016 #44
Kinda like "why go to the voting booth if the vote has already been decided," right? bjo59 Jun 2016 #46
Some went to multiple rallies but could only vote once; some went with their friends pnwmom Jun 2016 #47
I love this idea that rally size indicates vote amounts justiceischeap Jun 2016 #48
I know, right? Those demonstrations on the mall in DC? Totally meaningless. reformist2 Jun 2016 #54
There's a difference between demonstrations and political rallies justiceischeap Jun 2016 #55
Just plain partisan drivel, I'm afraid. I would Never go through this for libdem4life Jun 2016 #53
It's a lame-ass white wash story to cover up the election fraud that is laid bare by the enormous GoneFishin Jun 2016 #56
The average US voter has no idea how exit polls are used to detect election fraud. reformist2 Jun 2016 #62
I'm sure most of them did vote, but a huge rally is tiny in comparison to a state's turnout Recursion Jun 2016 #57
Well voting doesn't have a 5 star Yelp review MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #58
Do you understand 20,000 at a rally is a very small fraction of the potential voters? itsrobert Jun 2016 #59
2.5 million votes NOT being counted in California. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #60
I believe the term you are looking for is "The Powers That Be". Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #64

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
1. They *did* vote. It's just that their votes aren't being counted. No biggie.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jun 2016

Just your run-of-the-mill election fraud that is becoming commonplace. Most people choose to ignore it, because we really don't know what to do about it.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
52. This. Our votes don't count!
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:00 PM
Jun 2016

Here in Washington state we vote by mail, and since my county added a voting tracker, my vote hasn't counted a single time. So many votes are just thrown away.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
2. No I don't think that's it
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jun 2016

It isn't that the people at the rallies didn't vote. It's that the vast majority of Hillary voters didn't bother going to any rallies.

brewens

(13,582 posts)
36. It would probably be more like the young people that went to the rallies also voted.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jun 2016

That just wasn't enough to make the youth vote overall very impressive. Most kids didn't go to the rallies either.

The rallies were impressive and Bernie's support is impressive. Given his late start, the media blackout, underhanded tactics by DWS and the DNC, Bernie and his supporters have done very well, so far.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
5. Because it seems the focus was to establish what people think and not do something about it
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jun 2016

... like vote and register people and drive them to the poles.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
12. How exactly do you plan on safeguarding that?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jun 2016

There are already roughly a zillion accusations of voter fraud. If you allowed people to vote by smartphone, how are you going to ensure that the person voting is the person registered?

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
26. So, you have never heard of Target, I guess.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jun 2016

Intentional ignorance is not a compelling argument. At least try not to be so obvious about it.

 

Whimsey

(236 posts)
13. That is the saddest thing I have ever read.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jun 2016

I have been voting for over 40 years. I have done it as my civic duty and never expected it to require no effort.

Your attitude is why Bernie lost. It was not worth your time to vote for him!

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
17. I agree it needs to be easier.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jun 2016

But it is currently as easy if not easier than going to a rally.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
7. Depends on the state.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jun 2016

Well, much of that kind of talk is just BS, pure and simple, more conventional wisdom about why we must not challenge the decision of our party leaders. But some states have closed primaries, and very strict registration requirements, so it's not easy to vote in the primary.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
8. The AP called the election over the night before CA voted.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:48 PM
Jun 2016

Regarding earlier states, people who went to the rallies generally voted, but the number of voters is much bigger than rally attendance.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
9. If that prevents someone from supporting the candidate of their choice, that is sad.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jun 2016

And no, Bernie had big rallies in IL, OH, and NY and got hammered. Hillary had a much better campaign plan.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
23. NY has a freeze on joining the Democratic party
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:05 PM
Jun 2016

...of a year plus 25 days before the general election.

In the 1970s, 4 Supreme Court Justices including Thurgood Marshall thought that was unconstitutional, but 5 conservative Justices thought it was constitutional.



Illinois was close. HRC won by two points.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
34. NY published it and it was in the papers and news. People ignored it. Voting takes responsibility.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:21 PM
Jun 2016

NY, as well as most states, want a candidate to receive the votes of those that actually support them, not votes from people that want to tear them down. IL makes no difference if it was 2%. Bernie dropped a boatload of cash and guaranteed a win, same as in OH, and the same as in NY.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
45. Yes, but Clinton was leading with absentee ballots.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jun 2016

HRC is more popular with older voters, and older voters are more likely to vote absentee.

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
50. I toddled on over to the polling place, where I drew a Democratic ballot and voted for Hillary...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:59 PM
Jun 2016

Hubby waffled about changing his registration from Green to Dem and finally decided to let it ride, and leave the Presidential slot blank, so as not to cancel out my vote, as he put it. Oh, and he uses mail-in ballots.

He was very glad she won, and led the toast when the results came in. Bernie kind of lost him along the way, and by the time Hillary gave her speech in San Diego, hubby was all in for Hillary.

So make of it what you will. "Older voters" does not mean senile -- maybe we just have more experience.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. Going to a rally with your friends is fun...Voting is a solemn and solitary activity...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jun 2016

I suspect that is why Bernie excelled at the caucuses. They are events where you can go with your friends and have fun.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
11. There are several possibilities
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jun 2016

First, maybe they didn't like what they heard, or didn't like it enough to turn out. Yes it's easier in states that have absentee voting, but you still have to make the effort to request it and then send it back. It's got multiple points of failure in that sense. Even for something as simple as returning a Netflix dvd will often take me a couple of days between forgetting to take it with me to work, or forgetting to drop it off on the way in or leaving too late to get it in that day's mail. And that's something I do far more often than voting.

And that's before considering the impact of voting rules in each state. Did somebody need to register as a member of the party, or just to vote? Did they request the correct ballot like in California? Did they actually register on time? Did they think they were registered but it turns out that they weren't?

Secondly, maybe they did vote, but didn't do enough outreach to their friends/family etc. Sanders certainly had bigger rallies than Clinton, but rally size alone isn't necessarily predictive of vote share. The Clinton campaign wasn't trying to have huge rallies as that's clearly not her strong suit as a candidate so comparing rally size when the campaign strategy wasn't the same for both campaigns.

Third, I remember hearing I believe the NPR Politics podcast that the Clinton campaign had what they considered a better follow up approach from campaign to voters to get affirmative commitment and schedule for prospective voters. The Clinton campaign would take voter information about how they intended to vote and then follow up which would help with the issues in my first point.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
19. Five more days!
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jun 2016

Why do you HRC people keep this up? Aren't you happy yet?
Keep it up. You and your ilk are driving voters away from Hill.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
20. 20,000 people per rally. How many rallies in CA? 20?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jun 2016

That's 400,000 votes. Bernie got a million and a half.

There were a lot of people at the rallies, but not enough to win, even if they all did vote (and there were some kids and some non-citizens)

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
40. For every person who attends a rally, there are 10 more that will vote for a candidate.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

It's absurd to think every Bernie voter could attend one of his rallies. And it's absurd to think that even though Hillary cannot fill a gymnasium, that she has some sort of "silent majority" out there ready to roll out on election day, like stealth ninjas.

KK9

(81 posts)
49. Right and Wrong
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jun 2016

You are right that not every Bernie supporter attended a rally, I know six Bernie supporters in my life and only one went to a rally. I do believe they voted, however, I know my grown sons did.

On the other hand, there certainly ARE many "stealth ninjas" for Hillary. I'm one and there are two others in my household, and I know many others. You couldn't pay me to go to a political rally.

I think the demographics are key...older voters (I'm one, mid-50s) don't have a lot of time to go to rallies, even if they wanted to. I I have a full-time job, a child still at home, an elderly mother living with me and property and animals to care for. I have time to vote, and always do, but never for a rally. I don't like crowds anyway, so I wouldn't go even if I had nothing else to do. I think many people my age are just done with big, noisy, crowded social scenes that were fun in our 20s.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
22. rally - skip voting - create conspiracies/whine/toss chairs - threaten to skip GE - demand respect
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:04 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie must be so proud

qdouble

(891 posts)
33. Rallys are social events and theater. Not much different than going to hang out with your friends.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:20 PM
Jun 2016

It's something to do. Voting and actually being politically involved beyond that is boring and meaningless to a lot of those folks.

still_one

(92,188 posts)
35. Who said they didn't vote. They voted, it is just that there were more Hillary supporters
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:22 PM
Jun 2016

some may not like the fact that Hillary has a lot of support. Those who won't accept that will just have to deal with it:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2171619

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
38. Actually, they may have done more good by attending the rally then by voting.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jun 2016

Because of the large turnout at Bernie's early rallies, he got the attention of the media, which in turn gave him the exposure he needed to recruit more supporters. However, even if everyone of the people of his rallies had voted, he still would not have won.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
41. You know, they didn't "follow the rules". Many apparently
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

thought you could just register and then show up and vote, being that this is the worlds shining example of representative Democracy and free elections and all, but WAIT...not so fast bucko. Maybe you checked the "I" box when you only thought you were checking the "D" box, those things are tricky you know. No? Well perhaps you only dreamed you registered because, surprise, you don't seem to be on our list. Hate that you had to stand in line for 16 hours though so let me get you a provisional ballot you can use. Hey, we got any more provisional ballots? I need some over here; ran out again.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
42. How do you know they didn't? Why is this assumption that is not based on facts repeated
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

over and over and over and over by her supporters?

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
44. 20k people,sounds like a lot, but it's not really.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jun 2016

Most places with that kind of turnout have large voting populations, and 20,000 doesn't represent a large percentage. Also, people drive a long way to go to those events, some even from neighboring states.

Probably a high percentage of them did vote, but so did far more who went to no rallies at all. It's a mistake to draw conclusions from such events. Enthusiasm is important, but population matters more.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
47. Some went to multiple rallies but could only vote once; some went with their friends
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jun 2016

as a social activity, even though they weren't registered to vote (and didn't bother later); some went out of curiosity; some weren't old enough to vote. (Those young kids and preteens you mentioned, as well as middle schoolers and high school students -- they all took up space in the rallies.)

Lots of reasons.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
48. I love this idea that rally size indicates vote amounts
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jun 2016

For every 20k at the rally, I'd guess 5k aren't old enough to vote or aren't eligible to vote in some form or another (felony convictions for example). Also, as already pointed out, the reason why "youngsters" get such a bad "rap" is because they are notoriously fickle when it comes to actually voting. They'll get behind a candidate and idolize them like a rock star but that doesn't mean much if they don't make it to the polls.

The other thing people seem to discount is the fact that since Hillary didn't have huge rallies, that people don't support her. I support her and I've never been to a single rally. I can get all the information I need about her without leaving my house.

Also, as has been mentioned several times but, again, seems to be discounted, is that a lot of Clinton supporters felt they'd be harangued if they publicly stated their support for her, so they stayed silent but did what actually mattered, they voted.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
55. There's a difference between demonstrations and political rallies
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:10 PM
Jun 2016

BUt the same result will play out if action doesn't follow.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
53. Just plain partisan drivel, I'm afraid. I would Never go through this for
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:02 PM
Jun 2016

any candidate...and I always vote. TV is good enough for me. But the level of grassroot support and the youth element..and the silly notion that young folk and older folk, as well, just did that to fool some pollsters...I don't think so.

Newsflash. Millenials are not stupid, please pass it on. Probably mostly Boomers singing this song of woe. Many of us remember the Hell No, We Won't Go days and wonder what happened. But then I didn't get into the rioting and such that happened in some places, either. We just hung Richard Nixon in effigy at his alma mater. That felt right.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
56. It's a lame-ass white wash story to cover up the election fraud that is laid bare by the enormous
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

popularity and enthusiasm for Bernie.

They will say anything to avoid the obvious conclusion that Bernie was cheated through election fraud. The record breaking red shifts in nearly every state exit poll would be enough to condemn any election in another country. But not in this country where the media is complicit in the cover-up because the candidate being cheated advocates policies that nibble away a little bit of their profits.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
62. The average US voter has no idea how exit polls are used to detect election fraud.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:26 PM
Jun 2016

It's not just that our media won't tell them. Most people here are just not interested in serious things. In America, it's all bread and circuses, all the time.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
57. I'm sure most of them did vote, but a huge rally is tiny in comparison to a state's turnout
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:51 PM
Jun 2016

He got, what, 80K people in San Jose or wherever? CA primary turnout was in the millions.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
59. Do you understand 20,000 at a rally is a very small fraction of the potential voters?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:14 PM
Jun 2016

All the attendees at all the Bernie's rally is still a small fraction of voters.

Do you not understand that?

Hillary won fair and square. Please stop this nonsense.

onecaliberal

(32,852 posts)
60. 2.5 million votes NOT being counted in California.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:22 PM
Jun 2016

How is a fucking state called with 2 million votes uncounted?

Ford_Prefect

(7,895 posts)
64. I believe the term you are looking for is "The Powers That Be".
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jun 2016

Change is not in their interest so the votes for change did not count, nor were they counted.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why go to a rally, then n...