Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts) Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:15 AM Nov 2012

1

NYTimes re: Ohio

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/us/politics/ohio-law-could-bring-long-delays-in-a-recount.html?_r=0

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYTimes re: Ohio (Original Post) LiberalElite Nov 2012 OP

Luckily, OH will just be extra cushion. Obama will be declared winner morningfog Nov 2012 #1

I think so too. TDale313 Nov 2012 #2

If he picks up VA SLCLiberal Nov 2012 #3

morningfog

(18,115 posts)

1. Luckily, OH will just be extra cushion. Obama will be declared winner

Reply to LiberalElite (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:16 AM

Nov 2012

before we go to bed tomorrow night.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)

2. I think so too.

Reply to morningfog (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:19 AM

Nov 2012

Obama will have more than 270 with or without Ohio.

SLCLiberal

(102 posts)

3. If he picks up VA

Reply to LiberalElite (Original post)

Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:09 AM

Nov 2012

then we won't even have to worry about OH.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYTimes re: Ohio