Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post) Post removed Jun 2016 OP
I just saw this on twitter democrattotheend Jun 2016 #1
If she gets Warren on the ticket, I will vote for Warren Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #29
Nope, nothing to see here folks... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #2
These were leaked by "Guccifer 2.0" pantsonfire Jun 2016 #3
you might have wanted to post this bit in the OP. niyad Jun 2016 #5
Good point, I'll add an update...n/t pantsonfire Jun 2016 #8
even when there is an indication that editing is in order? niyad Jun 2016 #9
Yeah, you're correct. n/t pantsonfire Jun 2016 #10
Remember though... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #6
Well, DWS just admitted they were hacked a year ago Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #36
Nice to know voters count FreakinDJ Jun 2016 #4
Sure, who didn't know since 2008? 2banon Jun 2016 #7
Sanders had recently entered the race. The DNC thinking that HRC would be the nominee at that point TwilightZone Jun 2016 #11
But Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #13
Assuming she's going to be the nominee and "doing things" behind the scenes are two different things TwilightZone Jun 2016 #23
Oh I agree. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #28
No, it doesn't. A) it's to the DNC, not from. B) on the date of the memo, she was the only candidate TwilightZone Jun 2016 #32
He formally entered the race one day before... pantsonfire Jun 2016 #14
Which confirms my point. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #24
They don't understand context. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #22
Sanders' campaign was officially launched on the very date of the memo. randome Jun 2016 #12
The day after actually...not devastating, just pointing out what we've known all along.. pantsonfire Jun 2016 #17
How do you 'pick' the only candidate running at the time? randome Jun 2016 #18
Remember he was at like 2 percent when he entered. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #26
But what trumps even that is that the memo isn't from the DNC, after all. randome Jun 2016 #31
Thanks for the update. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #34
A super popular democratic politician workinclasszero Jun 2016 #15
It just shows that the DNC helped one candidate throughout the process... pantsonfire Jun 2016 #20
Bernie wasn't any kind of democrat until a few months ago workinclasszero Jun 2016 #30
This does not appear to be an internal DNC document, Blue Meany Jun 2016 #16
Good catch. And another conspiracy theory bites the dust. randome Jun 2016 #19
So more baseless slurs against Democrats then? CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #37
This was sent to the DNC. It doesn't say who sent it or who wrote it. onenote Jun 2016 #21
IT'S A CONSPIRACY! nt onehandle Jun 2016 #25
Fantastic plan that DWS had to put a woman in the WH!! Sancho Jun 2016 #27
Notice that there is no mention of election fraud to ensure her winning? tonyt53 Jun 2016 #33
Almost a month AFTER Sanders (informally) announced his candidacy? Triana Jun 2016 #35
I call bullshit MattP Jun 2016 #38

democrattotheend

(11,607 posts)
1. I just saw this on twitter
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jun 2016

It's pretty disturbing, because it confirms a lot of what I have suspected all along. I am prepared to support Hillary in the general, but the feeling that the party was setting it up to shoo her in without a meaningful primary was one of the reasons I decided not to support her in the primaries. After seeing this I don't blame Bernie for refusing to just get in line and smile pretty.

 

pantsonfire

(1,306 posts)
3. These were leaked by "Guccifer 2.0"
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jun 2016

Please remember that these documents are UNPROVEN AND UNVERIFIED, though I have yet to hear any news of the DNC denying these memos are fake.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
6. Remember though...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jun 2016

How the DNC came out ahead of this and assured us that nothing but oppo and emails were stolen. That speaks volumes for me because otherwise, why would they even announce anything -- they knew some documents that would hurt the DNC and Hillary were about to be released and we're hoping to make it seem like it was nothing that people couldn't get if they read newspapers about Trump.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
36. Well, DWS just admitted they were hacked a year ago
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:40 PM
Jun 2016

So, I tend to suspect they are genuine. What's the old Nixon-era saying: "I never believe anything until it has been officially denied".

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
7. Sure, who didn't know since 2008?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:12 PM
Jun 2016

no big surprise, but thanks for the documented evidence.

Is anyone denying she's been front loaded since forever?

TwilightZone

(25,562 posts)
11. Sanders had recently entered the race. The DNC thinking that HRC would be the nominee at that point
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jun 2016

shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who understands context.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
13. But
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jun 2016

DWS vehemently denied multiple times that any such things were going on behind the scenes. We all knew that the DNC wanted Hillary but we didn't know that it was this wide spread.

TwilightZone

(25,562 posts)
23. Assuming she's going to be the nominee and "doing things" behind the scenes are two different things
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jun 2016

The latter isn't proven by what's posted. It's about how to differentiate the GOP nominee from the Dem nominee, who they were assuming at the time would be HRC.

Context is important. If all one is going to do is see "HRC" and declare a nefarious plot, one should take some time to see what was actually written. It doesn't say what the OP thinks it does.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
28. Oh I agree.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jun 2016

But it does give credence to some of the allegations (not election fraud) that the Sanders campaign was alleging about the behind the scenes shenanigans that was going on.

TwilightZone

(25,562 posts)
32. No, it doesn't. A) it's to the DNC, not from. B) on the date of the memo, she was the only candidate
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

in the race. Sanders officially announced the same day.

Referring to HRC as the candidate makes sense if she's the only one in the race, no?

 

pantsonfire

(1,306 posts)
14. He formally entered the race one day before...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders for President
Announced: April 30, 2015
Formal launch: May 26, 2015

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
22. They don't understand context.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jun 2016

They do understand knee jerk and fantastical conspiracy theories that always involve evil Hillary.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. Sanders' campaign was officially launched on the very date of the memo.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jun 2016

So until then, there was no opposition to Clinton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders

Sanders announced his intention to seek the Democratic Party's nomination for president on April 30, 2015, in an address on the Capitol lawn. His campaign was officially launched on May 26, 2015, in Burlington.

What a devastating leak.

Next up for your conspiratorial enjoyment: "Bigfoot is putting alien DNA into all our vaccinations!" Remember, you heard it here, first.

 

pantsonfire

(1,306 posts)
17. The day after actually...not devastating, just pointing out what we've known all along..
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jun 2016

They picked HRC and helped her win.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
26. Remember he was at like 2 percent when he entered.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders devotees love to bloviate about how far Bernie has come since he entered. The DNC was right to view his campaign at that stage as rather meaningless given his standing in the polls. The devotees want it both ways. They want him praised for making a race of it, but they also are upset the DNC didn't take him seriously enough to view him as a threat to the nomination which was obviously a miscalculation on the DNC's part.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
31. But what trumps even that is that the memo isn't from the DNC, after all.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

Blue Meany caught that below.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
15. A super popular democratic politician
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jun 2016

that came in a close second to President Obama the last time was considered the front runner before the primary started?

Well shit nobody could have seen that coming.

Is this supposed to be scandalous? Illegal?

 

pantsonfire

(1,306 posts)
20. It just shows that the DNC helped one candidate throughout the process...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jun 2016

Yes, she was the runner up by a much closer margin, but the DNC didn't decide one year and six months before election day who was going to be the democratic nominee. The point is I think, that the Democratic National Committee decided based on the probability of candidates who was going to win. They started talking about Republicans already, it really doesn't seem like they thought anyone else was going to have a chance. And when someone may have had one, it appears they had no Goals and Strategies for Bernie Sanders, he's not a true democrat.

 

Blue Meany

(1,947 posts)
16. This does not appear to be an internal DNC document,
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jun 2016

since it envisions "working with the DNC and other allied groups" in attacking Republican candidates. My guess is that it came from one of the pro-Hillary SuperPacs such as American Bridge 21st Century, which does opposition research on Republicans. If this is the case, this document is not, at least not by itself, evidence of bias or collaboration in promoting Hillary Clinton; it simply shows that they were sharing ideas and information.

onenote

(42,976 posts)
21. This was sent to the DNC. It doesn't say who sent it or who wrote it.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jun 2016

As for it assuming Clinton would be the nominee, that wasn't a particularly outrageous assumption at that point in time given that Sanders was still polling in the teens (and was polling behind Biden in some instances).

You might take note of the fact that the memo doesn't contemplate Trump being the repub nominee -- again, not a particularly outrageous assumption or one suggesting that the DNC didn't want Trump to get the nomination. It simply reflects that at the time Trump was polling in single digits and not considered a significant threat.

Strategy memos from May 2015 are hardly an indication of some conspiracy. They're simply someone working off of assumptions that seemed reasonable at the time.

Sancho

(9,073 posts)
27. Fantastic plan that DWS had to put a woman in the WH!!
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:32 PM
Jun 2016

Create a "sparing partner" to create interest and keep in the news, but never able to really win!

A brilliant plan that seems to have worked well.

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
33. Notice that there is no mention of election fraud to ensure her winning?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jun 2016

Or how to coerce people into voting for her?

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
35. Almost a month AFTER Sanders (informally) announced his candidacy?
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jun 2016


The 2016 presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders, the junior United States Senator and former Representative from Vermont, began with a formal announcement by Sanders on May 26, 2015, in Burlington, Vermont, which followed an informal announcement on April 30.[7][8] Sanders had been considered a potential candidate for President of the United States since at least September 2014 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign,_2016

It is clear that DNC or whoever wrote this memo didn't consider Sanders as being in the field - at all. It was a big mistake on their part since he did so well against the establishment machinery and it's media mouthpieces.

Was this some sort of conspiracy against Sanders or just establishment-bubble blinded ignorance? Who knows?

But it was stupid.

MattP

(3,304 posts)
38. I call bullshit
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

The DNC is not going to write a memo like that, and the date is even more reason to call bullshit

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Post removed