2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPost removed
democrattotheend
(11,607 posts)It's pretty disturbing, because it confirms a lot of what I have suspected all along. I am prepared to support Hillary in the general, but the feeling that the party was setting it up to shoo her in without a meaningful primary was one of the reasons I decided not to support her in the primaries. After seeing this I don't blame Bernie for refusing to just get in line and smile pretty.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Otherwise I will write in Sanders.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Just remember that Hillary isn't Trump... And:
SQUIRREL!
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Please remember that these documents are UNPROVEN AND UNVERIFIED, though I have yet to hear any news of the DNC denying these memos are fake.
niyad
(114,368 posts)pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)niyad
(114,368 posts)pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)How the DNC came out ahead of this and assured us that nothing but oppo and emails were stolen. That speaks volumes for me because otherwise, why would they even announce anything -- they knew some documents that would hurt the DNC and Hillary were about to be released and we're hoping to make it seem like it was nothing that people couldn't get if they read newspapers about Trump.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)So, I tend to suspect they are genuine. What's the old Nixon-era saying: "I never believe anything until it has been officially denied".
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)no big surprise, but thanks for the documented evidence.
Is anyone denying she's been front loaded since forever?
TwilightZone
(25,562 posts)shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who understands context.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)DWS vehemently denied multiple times that any such things were going on behind the scenes. We all knew that the DNC wanted Hillary but we didn't know that it was this wide spread.
TwilightZone
(25,562 posts)The latter isn't proven by what's posted. It's about how to differentiate the GOP nominee from the Dem nominee, who they were assuming at the time would be HRC.
Context is important. If all one is going to do is see "HRC" and declare a nefarious plot, one should take some time to see what was actually written. It doesn't say what the OP thinks it does.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)But it does give credence to some of the allegations (not election fraud) that the Sanders campaign was alleging about the behind the scenes shenanigans that was going on.
TwilightZone
(25,562 posts)in the race. Sanders officially announced the same day.
Referring to HRC as the candidate makes sense if she's the only one in the race, no?
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Bernie Sanders for President
Announced: April 30, 2015
Formal launch: May 26, 2015
TwilightZone
(25,562 posts)Thanks.
Edit: it wasn't the day before. May 26, 2015 = May 26, 2015
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)They do understand knee jerk and fantastical conspiracy theories that always involve evil Hillary.
randome
(34,845 posts)So until then, there was no opposition to Clinton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
Sanders announced his intention to seek the Democratic Party's nomination for president on April 30, 2015, in an address on the Capitol lawn. His campaign was officially launched on May 26, 2015, in Burlington.
What a devastating leak.
Next up for your conspiratorial enjoyment: "Bigfoot is putting alien DNA into all our vaccinations!" Remember, you heard it here, first.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)They picked HRC and helped her win.
randome
(34,845 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Sanders devotees love to bloviate about how far Bernie has come since he entered. The DNC was right to view his campaign at that stage as rather meaningless given his standing in the polls. The devotees want it both ways. They want him praised for making a race of it, but they also are upset the DNC didn't take him seriously enough to view him as a threat to the nomination which was obviously a miscalculation on the DNC's part.
randome
(34,845 posts)Blue Meany caught that below.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)What a surprise their slurs are false.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)that came in a close second to President Obama the last time was considered the front runner before the primary started?
Well shit nobody could have seen that coming.
Is this supposed to be scandalous? Illegal?
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Yes, she was the runner up by a much closer margin, but the DNC didn't decide one year and six months before election day who was going to be the democratic nominee. The point is I think, that the Democratic National Committee decided based on the probability of candidates who was going to win. They started talking about Republicans already, it really doesn't seem like they thought anyone else was going to have a chance. And when someone may have had one, it appears they had no Goals and Strategies for Bernie Sanders, he's not a true democrat.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)since it envisions "working with the DNC and other allied groups" in attacking Republican candidates. My guess is that it came from one of the pro-Hillary SuperPacs such as American Bridge 21st Century, which does opposition research on Republicans. If this is the case, this document is not, at least not by itself, evidence of bias or collaboration in promoting Hillary Clinton; it simply shows that they were sharing ideas and information.
randome
(34,845 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)What a surprise.
onenote
(42,976 posts)As for it assuming Clinton would be the nominee, that wasn't a particularly outrageous assumption at that point in time given that Sanders was still polling in the teens (and was polling behind Biden in some instances).
You might take note of the fact that the memo doesn't contemplate Trump being the repub nominee -- again, not a particularly outrageous assumption or one suggesting that the DNC didn't want Trump to get the nomination. It simply reflects that at the time Trump was polling in single digits and not considered a significant threat.
Strategy memos from May 2015 are hardly an indication of some conspiracy. They're simply someone working off of assumptions that seemed reasonable at the time.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Sancho
(9,073 posts)Create a "sparing partner" to create interest and keep in the news, but never able to really win!
A brilliant plan that seems to have worked well.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Or how to coerce people into voting for her?
Triana
(22,666 posts)The 2016 presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders, the junior United States Senator and former Representative from Vermont, began with a formal announcement by Sanders on May 26, 2015, in Burlington, Vermont, which followed an informal announcement on April 30.[7][8] Sanders had been considered a potential candidate for President of the United States since at least September 2014 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign,_2016
It is clear that DNC or whoever wrote this memo didn't consider Sanders as being in the field - at all. It was a big mistake on their part since he did so well against the establishment machinery and it's media mouthpieces.
Was this some sort of conspiracy against Sanders or just establishment-bubble blinded ignorance? Who knows?
But it was stupid.
MattP
(3,304 posts)The DNC is not going to write a memo like that, and the date is even more reason to call bullshit