2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm under 45 and he can count me OUT of this 'revolution'
Not interested in hearing one more damn word about his donations, how awesome he is, how oppressed he is, how many caucuses he won, and not one damn more word about what he demands in light of his YUUUGE loss to Candidate Hillary Clinton.
All this anticipation about this speech and how excited everybody was. Pfffttt! I hope the DNC was listening and makes sure that anybody who refused to concede DOES NOT GET ONE DAMN MINUTE of time on stage at Hillary's party- the Democratic National Convention.
That had to be just about the most pessimistic and depressing speech I have ever watched. So glad they cut away.
Same damn speech I saw for the last year. Nothing new, just a list of complaints, demands, accusations, and self congratulatory plea for continued attention.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Or clean air an water...
Or gun control...
Or clean energy...
Or modern infrastructure...
Or women's rights...
Or LGBT rights...
Or civil rights...
Or healthcare...
Or Native American rights...
Or anything else other than a concession.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Peace too... Can't be having any of that either
Screw liberalism!!!!!! Joy reid told me that bernie is just a fringe candidate whos not even a democrat.....although 45% of democratic delegates voted for him and he caucuses with dems 90%+ of the time
FuzzyRabbit
(1,967 posts)We don't need to change anything. Big money buying our politicians is working out really well for everybody.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Just a warmed over version his stump speech - minus all the good parts.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)The solutions come from people standing together and demanding that we adjust our priorities. Sanders' supporters get this. They want an active role not a leader with a quick fix.
George II
(67,782 posts)..HOW to fix things, how to improve things, how to make changes.
During my very last class in college our adviser came into the class room and filled us in on what to expect in our careers, and how to approach those careers. He said something that I'll never forget - if you want to criticize something you'd better be prepared with a way to fix it or do it better.
That was almost 50 years ago, it's still appropriate today.
Sadly Sanders has never put forward any way to fix the things he complains about or ways to do them better.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Solutions for college, healthcare, family leave, child care, infrastructure, energy. Tell me how any other candidate has a plan to accomplish these goals to an equal or better satisfaction
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)other problems, the problem of our (former) Representatives who are legally bribed to represent Donors instead of their constituents. Hillary and Bill have always been a big part of that problem.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)He had a job to do last night and that was to concede. He didn't do it. Thus, he is no use in the general. Bernie would have to concede...and without that he can't help. He better be careful asking for money...the primary is over and he will find himself in hot water if he continues.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)You don't care that we live under corporate rule. You don't care that companies like BP can ruin our environment and avoid paying the full costs. You don't care that the networks use the public airwaves to brain wash the under-educated and those too busy working to survive this terrible and hard world.
You want Hillary for your own reasons and beliefs, I get that, but ignore the past history and anything that doesn't make her look good. I believe that had their positions been reversed and Hillary have had to contend with the extra hurdles that Bernie did you would be crying foul! I agree that the Republicans have never been fair to her, but she has not been attacked by her own Party like Bernie has. Before you start with Bernie is not a real Democrat shtick, his policies have always been soundly based in Democratic principles. I respect that you believe she is best for us, in that I must respectfully disagree.
He will help Hillary defeat Trump. He will also try to hold her feet to the fire to stick to policies that restore Representative Democracy rather than the quid pro quo she owes for all of the money she has taken in. I know, she says the money has no effect on her, they all do. You believe her when she says it, but I do not!
Bernie's campaign was not just to seek the WH, but to advance the agenda of the 99%. To do that under the system we have now is impossible without a political revolution. He/we will continue to try to advance that revolution. I believe that Hillary will become President and we will see what she does, but our political revolution will continue. You will get what you want so I would urge you to focus on the General and leave Bernie to do his thing. You obviously don't care about what he stands for, but he is no longer a direct threat to your chosen candidate and her ambitions!
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)I don't care about Bernie Sanders...I am in for progressive ideas and think we can make real progress...but I would never support anything that he is involved in. He can't help us in the general unless he concedes and endorses...thus...he should go home and work in the senate...make some more amendments to add to bills that are never passed. He has treated the first woman nominee for president from a major party with complete disrespect. And I will never get over it. When he said he would talk Hillary...I was enraged briefly...then I shook it off...it is not the first nor will it be the last some man thinks a woman needs mansplaining. I just didn't expect it from Sen. Sanders.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... if you don't care about Bernie Sanders, why are you wasting your time on this thread? Bernie isn't hurting Hillary Clinton. She IS the presumptive nominee, after all. Bernie will formally concede at some point, you do realize this don't you? Get a grip.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)And I am on this thread because I want to be...you answered me and I replied.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)I'm serious. I really want to understand why you think he is hurting her. Thanks.
QC
(26,371 posts)I guess Brock forgot to put it in the memo.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)You don't concede weeks after it's clear you lost.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)a disagreement or discussion with a female politician without it being "mansplaining?"
Hillary is a tough politician and has proven she can handle herself just fine. Bernie has not been not been as tough on her as anyone else would have been, and not because she is a woman, but because he has tried to stick to issues. Otherwise he would have gone after her email/server controversy.
Some objectivity would be refreshing.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)NONE of it is possible without at least a Democratic Party majority in the Senate. Bernie has done jack shit to help that happen. in fact, he has condemned fundraising to help that happen. Under Bernie's proposals, according to most trusted economists, EVERYBODY would have their taxes increased under Bernie's plan. Even those least able to pay for a tax increase. To say that they would receive better benefits in return is very callous. Bernie really doesn't understand poverty.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)I'm not.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)What he didn't seem to realize is that, if he didn't get his plan through in a first term, there would be no second term. Bernie's ideas were a pipe dream at best. With a GOP run Congress, his ideas were always just wishful thinking. Now the fact that the GOP gave us the gift of a lifetime in the form of Donald Trump, the GOP Presumptive Nominee, we have hope for taking back one if not both Houses. But none of us could have counted on this, a year ago.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Republicans? "Establishment" democrats?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But if you mean for tonight then we'll yeah but that wasn't what tonight was about. It was a message to his supporters.
I agree with you on what your college advisor said.
George II
(67,782 posts)...details on how he intends to accomplish those changes.
angrychair
(8,698 posts)He has a website full of very specific issues with very detailed solutions.
Take for example climate change:
https://berniesanders.com/issues/climate-change/
https://berniesanders.com/people-before-polluters/
http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-climate-change/
And a very interesting article comparing Clinton and Sanders plans:
http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/04/12/diverging-views-sanders-and-clinton-on-climate-change/
That is one topic, took me seconds to do the search and finds reams of information.
Google is your friend if you really want to learn what his plans on any given topic...I have a feeling you won't care though and not reply or reply and change the subject.
George II
(67,782 posts)....short on substance or true solutions.
angrychair
(8,698 posts)Do most conservation voters prefer Sanders plan to confront climate change than Clinton's plan? Just as one example.
As stated in the article I already linked:
Clinton received an 82% lifetime rating from the LCV, but the group endorsed her in November without laying out why they spurned the politician with a better record in their own tallies.
The fallback complaint is that Clinton is more likely to get things done, she will compromise, work a deal or however the excuse is shaped.
It is only a compromise if each party to the compromise is giving up something of equal proportion to the other. That is rarely what happens on legislation or any agreement with government. As is true in many cases, the poor and middle-class do all the giving and the wealthy and/or powerful do all the taking.
"It's easy to talk about the virtues of compromise when you are not the one being compromised."
Angrychair
George II
(67,782 posts)....of the two candidates, wouldn't you think?
http://www.lcv.org/media/press-releases/LCV-Action-Fund-Endorses-Hillary-Clinton-for-President.html
Of course, since they didn't endorse Sanders the immediate reaction is that the process is flawed.
angrychair
(8,698 posts)I don't have that answer, ask them. I just know that based on their own rating system, he has a better rating, a better voting record and better public policy positions, from them than she does. It's not my system, it's their system. I'll leave it up to others as to "why".
George II
(67,782 posts)....I don't know that they have even rated Clinton since she left the Senate (their system seems to concentrate on legislators)
The bottom line is that they evaluated the two candidates based on a number of factors, and if you read their press release they overwhelmingly decided upon Clinton.
Who knows, they may have come to the same conclusion that many Democrats did during the primaries, although the two candidates have similar ideas they see Clinton as being better able to get things done as President.
angrychair
(8,698 posts)I've already post my last Sanders vs. Clinton comments:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512193125
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)by putting a spell on the majority of Governors and getting them to pay 1/3 of the cost.
The same Governors who turned down Medicaid expansion because they would have had to pay 1/10 of the cost.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)The population was brainwashed to believe it is not possible.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)with R's after their name.
QC
(26,371 posts)and damn near free for the most part, until the 80s and 90s, when virtually everything in America became a scam to enrich the 0.01%.
Here's a great article by Tom Hanks telling what a difference his free community college made for him: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/14/opinion/tom-hanks-on-his-two-years-at-chabot-college.html?_r=1
Colin Powell is another person who benefited from a free education, in his case City College of New York.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Besides cautious incrementalism? The first step in finding somutions is to try.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... HRC, her supporters, and the Dem Party are against all of those things - right?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Glad you're starting to realize!
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)And so why have a problem with someone who is trying to bring in more people to help accomplish them?
Unless HRC her supporters and the Dem Party don't reeeeeeeaaaaaaly want those things because they're too inconvenient and upset too many apple carts -- like those big corporate backers who really call the shots.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... want to believe that everyone other than Bernie is corrupt, you just go ahead and believe that. And I won't be surprised if you do, because that's how cults operate - brainwash your followers into believing that anyone who doesn't agree with you is "the enemy" (or, in this case, "the Establishment" .
Bernie's only interest in bringing in more people was people who would vote for HIM, not for the Democratic Party. Quite the opposite - he continually told those he claimed to be "bringing in" that the Dem Party is full of corrupt corporate whores, and he and he alone could change all of that.
He railed against the very idea of super-delegates - and then did a complete 180 and declared that he would try and convince them to ignore the voice of the voters and hand him the nomination.
And how did his supporters react to that hypocrisy? "Well, if Bernie does it, then it's okay."
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I don't think Bernie or the millions who have supported him want to see the Democratic Party as 'the enemy." Would rather see it represent what it claims to stand for so they can be enthusiastic supporters of it.
But we are not happy with the system corruption that has overtaken politics and government -- including the role of the Democrats in that.
We believe that it should be opened up and change course away from the conservatism it has veered into on too many issues.
That is NOT cultlike -- and the fact that he got somewhere around 43 percent of the vote indicates that it is not a "fringe cult."
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)It's a rather mainstream cult, which attracted - as all cults do - people who were easily manipulated into believing that their One True Saviour had finally arrived, the One who would right all wrongs, and give them whatever they desired.
And all they had to do to bring about this glorious, corruption-free, justice-for-all utopian future was to vote for their self-proclaimed Leader.
I'm certainly not saying that all BSers are cultists. Most of them just liked Bernie more than they liked Hillary. But they're Democrats first, and they'll vote for HRC in November. They never saw themselves as part of a Revolution, or a Popular Uprising, or a Grand Movement - or whatever else the cultists see themselves as.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)We have allowed our economy, and political system and government to be thrown totally out of whack and distorted. We have allowed an obscene disparity in Wealth and Power to develop to the determent of a majority of Americans. Reagan and the GOP instigated it, but too often the Democrats have been far too helpful.
In order to get back to anything approaching a balance and "mid point" we need to change that disastrous course before it's too late.
And yes, I really am kind of moderate. I actually agree with the message of many of Obama's speeches over the years.
G_j
(40,367 posts)I'll vote for Hillary when the times comes. I support Sanders staying in until the convention, because I feel his policies and ideas can make the party better. I support bringing young people into the party that had become so cynical that they wouldn't have otherwise become involved. I take offense to all the cult allegations and general distain heaped on millions of citizens.
Of course you and "your cohorts" never mention that what the Sanders campaign has done is truly historic and has given hope to people, that a purely populace campaign, running on nothing but grass roots donations, could even get to the table. But rather than see a miracle that should give real hope to the those who despair of the apathy in this country, especially amount the young, you heap distain on them.
Beowulf
(761 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)George Eliot
(701 posts)This OP is all about naysayers who ask why.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Oh for Christ sake... that debunked lying meme again....still?
Are you gonna tell us he doesn't "get" people of color next?
Oh I know! "He's a commie!...BOO!"
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I am proud to say I have been expelled from the Hillary Clinton African-American forum, formerly known as the African-American forum.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Thank you Warren...better words were never spoken.
rug
(82,333 posts)MaeScott
(878 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Thanks for motivating me.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)way before voting Hillary.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)and then there's trump waiting for support
QC
(26,371 posts)to help keep the site running, since it provides you with a place to share such great pieces of wit and wisdom as this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1478265
bunnies
(15,859 posts)cant be bothered to support the site at all, isnt it?
QC
(26,371 posts)is a contribution to the site?
But yeah, I have noticed that about 90% of the CALL IT SKINNER!1!!!11! types don't have donor stars. That says a lot, none of it good.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Id be too ashamed to show my face again if I ever posted anything like that. There must be a certain set here who agree with the sentiment though. "Progressives". heh
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
Red Mountain
(1,733 posts)He's brought their issues to the forefront of the campaign.
He doesn't have to be the nominee to advance his agenda......and theirs.
This country is moving to the left after way too long.
Get used to it.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)The voting is over. He didn't win. Every second he maintains his campaign in the egotistical belief that he'll become the nominee somehow makes your statement factually incorrect.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)but one yielding power.
George II
(67,782 posts)sheshe2
(83,751 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Bernie wasn't the first person to bring up any of these things.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)You were under the wrong impression.
Who was making the things in his platform a new worthy thing before?
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)and will swarm anyone who dares acknowledge it?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I really never ever think about you at all. Or talk about you. I mean, why would I? You are a stranger on a message board.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Isn't that the whole point of these ridiculous threads you continually create?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)cyberpunk
(78 posts)wtf even is this site?
840high
(17,196 posts)Happenstance24
(193 posts)Did this guy really beg for more donations?
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)SpareribSP
(325 posts)Suicide rates rising, United States infant mortality being between Croatia and Serbia, and fifteen neighborhoods in Baltimore having lower life expectancy than North Korea.
These are issues people deeply care about, and need to be heard. Having bold vision on them is going to be what invigorates the party not only for this election, but the next midterm election, local elections, and beyond.
MaeScott
(878 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)By definition, at least one of those claims is untrue.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)If all his speeches are equally depressing then both statements are true.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I get that you're creating a logical construction, but step back from it and consider. This is not how people speak.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)All you have been found is attacking him and his supporters for months.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And the kicker: she does not like Clinton either, but for some reason believes she will be better for black people. Like Bill was
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)The events of last Sunday highlight his appalling voting record on guns.
He was trounced in D.C.
All three candidates that he endorsed in the Nevada primary lost last night.
Even tonight's phone event was damaging. It seemed like a publicity stunt, and he sounded bitter and out of touch.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Makes him seem smaller somehow
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)that he is in a position to whine, carp and demand shit. It's astonishing.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)...and his D- grading from the NRA!
Stop with this debunked and false " he's a gun nut" meme already. It's had its day and died.... for any sensible person.
His record on voting for appalling unnecessary wars is much better than others.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)but for some reason, it wasn't disqualifying for them when they were running for president. I wonder why?
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)His voting record is his voting record. You can't debunk facts.
I'm always amused when Sanders's supporters try to explain his record as "nuanced" positions, but insist on lockstep, black or white compliance from his opponent.
Nuance for me but not for thee!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)D-
Yeah... that's real nuanced.
He STILL has a better record on voting for unnecessary wars. No nuance needed there.
Autumn
(45,067 posts)Yeah that's all your OPs and posts about Bernie and his supporters for the last year, even when you hated Hillary.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... character flaw... she won, admit that at least
calimary
(81,238 posts)Not only that there was no endorsement, but he barely mentioned her, except to say he'd had a meeting with her and that they disagreed on some things but agreed on other things. Period. That was IT. No acknowledgement that she won, no even begrudging congratulations, which would have added a really classy note to his speech. There was no conciliatory reach-out to those of us in the Hillary camp who also worked hard and volunteered and donated and voted (because if he REALLY wants a political revolution that moves the massive numbers of voters needed to force meaningful change, he is going to need us Hillary people whether he wants to admit that or not). And yes I realize it was billed as a speech specifically to his supporters, which also meant it was not inclusive nor was it intended to be.
Bernie Sanders could be the ultimate leader in unifying our party behind the REAL goal ahead - which is keeping the White House in Democratic hands. But he doesn't seem interested in that. Fact is, we DO have to unite. But I didn't feel as though he was speaking to someone like me, at all. And forgive me, but his speech tonight did sound an awful lot like all his other speeches throughout the campaign, with the familiar litany of complaints about everything gone wrong.
The problem, objectively as of now, is that the clock is ticking on the amount of leverage he can wield as a Senator, and as leader of this political revolution he still envisions. The longer he holds out, the more it will begin to reinforce what Barney Frank warned awhile back - that Bernie isn't a team player. The longer he holds out, the more he risks looking like he's simply in denial at best, or a sore loser at worst. The longer he holds out, the greater likelihood that he'll start building a reputation for poor-sportsmanship. That will squander whatever clout he's earned in all this time, and frustrate whatever changes he wants to see implemented. It shouldn't be his fate to wind up looking like a fool, but I'm afraid that's where he seems bent on heading. He's spent a LOT of years in politics and public service. This shouldn't be how his career ends.
What bothered me most was the follow-up report featuring the small gathering of Bernie supporters for a watch party in a diner here in L.A. Two young women were interviewed. They both in all seriousness told the reporter they were still holding out hope that Bernie would be the nominee. I don't think it's right to keep supporters' hopes up like that, when the door is closed, Hillary has steadily gained in important endorsements including those from some of Bernie's own super delegates, and there's NOT likely to be any indictment or other intervention to take her out of action. Hell, the FBI hasn't even called to talk to her in all this time. You'd think if there was something afoot in that department, that there's been enough investigation time to have them swarming her by now.
I was hoping for better from him. Perhaps we'll see that part of him in a few more days?
Number23
(24,544 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)As I said elsewhere:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1038&pid=3316
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)MaeScott
(878 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Can we wait till she... y'know.... actually wins?
Puglover
(16,380 posts)The fucking irony of this post "Nothing new, just a list of complaints, demands, accusations, and self congratulatory plea for continued attention" from the OP caused my eyes to permanently roll back in their sockets.
Honestly I don't believe there is any coming back from this.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Under 40 and I have less use for him than I do a snowplow here in Texas
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)pkdu
(3,977 posts)Sig Sauer MPXs .
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Nope nope.
global1
(25,242 posts)Hillary won - or didn't you hear?
She's running against Trump not Bernie anymore.
You need to channel your energies and hate toward Trump and the Repugs now and get over the Dem Primary.
If all the Hillary supporters - like yourself - channeled their cute quips and cuts about Bernie towards Trump and the Repugs - Hillary will win by a landslide and we can probably give her the Senate and the House to boot.
Get over Bernie - he lost and he knows it.
Put yourself to serving your presumptive nominee now and use your posts hear on DU and in social media to wipe out Trump and the Repugs. Please!!!!!!!
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)WOW, where did your anger come from? I want the Democrats to go back to their roots...I prefer FDR Democrats vs 3rd way ones!
Response to angstlessk (Reply #21)
Post removed
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)the real revolution should be gun control - which Bernie doesn't care enough even after last weekend's slaughter.
he's too busy attacking the only party that would give him a platform.
ArcticFox
(1,249 posts)leftinportland
(247 posts)mcar
(42,307 posts)Do not get the strategy here or through his entire campaign.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)mcar
(42,307 posts)We need cohesion, not Sander's fighting an already lost battle.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Weaver really got on my nerves
mcar
(42,307 posts)But stuff I've read about him makes me think he wasn't ready for primetime.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Long before Bernie Sanders ran for president. I don't see how his movement can grow as he has excluded those who could help him...I am boots on the ground every election...I know how to organize and get out the vote. But I would do exactly nothing for Sanders.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I strongly believe.
Add that to an actual effort to challenge the Queen rather than serve as hippy punching bag and loyal sheepdog to round up pissed off liberals and the "problems" with Sanders are fully encapsulated.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)The pretense that the primary is not over until the convention which has never been done makes me think this is an attack on the first woman nominee...and I will never forgive or forget. I did the spring groups a few years ago...tried to work with Occupy...to stop mortgage foreclosures...I want progressive change, but I have come to dislike Bernie too much to get involved in anything he sponsors. I am a Democrat...he is not.
Autumn
(45,067 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
Whimsey
(236 posts)That seems to be an underlying thread of some supporters of Bernie. So because you do not support Hillary you are anti-Christian?
bvf
(6,604 posts)Whimsey
(236 posts)when the poster said nothing about Sander's religion. You tend to equate anyone criticizing Sanders as being anti-Semitic. That is a false conclusion.
I got a hide on a post critical of Sanders and one of the four jurors cited his/her dislike of anti-Semitic Hillary supporters when my post had nothing to do with his religion. So you want to criticize someone for making an anti-Semitic slur, go for it. But do not turn every critical comment of him into an anti-Semitic slur.
Response to Whimsey (Reply #91)
Post removed
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)I wonder any any decent person would do such a thing.
840high
(17,196 posts)what she posted.
TNProfessor
(83 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Whimsey
(236 posts)Bernie has lived the best in his life this past year in traveling, eating out and purchasing wardrobes (and his 10 member family trip to Rome) than he ever has in his whole life. Of course he wants the revolution to continue. Students of history can tell you, that revolutions simply result in a different group of haves and have nots. Bernie's is no different. There has never been a revolution that resulted in everyone being a have.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Your shit gets so old. This has to be one of the most useless, pathetic OPs I've ever seen here.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)These hysterical accusations tell us more about you than anything.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like I care what strangers who hate me think about what I say.... I don't. Don't care at all but it does crack me up that they follow me around to whine that I write words.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, we know that! (and we don't care either)
But you will keep putting yourself out there with a HUGE target on your back.
I suggest you stick with protected groups so your obsequious buddies and you can just agree over and over and feel superior.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)We *totally* believe you.
panader0
(25,816 posts)In spite of your obviously unfelt apologies....
"Pessimistic and depressing'??? LOL...
And you can rest assured he will get more than "ONE DAMN MINUTE" at the convention.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Besides being completely unbelievable, and your provecations quite clear, what other virtues do you posses?
MaeScott
(878 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Whining party passing for a revolution
bravenak
(34,648 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)"It's about a . . . it's about b . . . it's about c" followed by a long litany of everything he thinks is wrong with the country with absolutely no mention of any solution made the speech sound like a parody. I was hoping for something uplifting and uniting, but instead, it was just one more hymn to his choir without a hint of grace.
How disappointing - and what a wasted opportunity.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Same old same old
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)they knew that they were empty. There was never any substance to his ideas, and pure idealism is not a winning strategy.
calimary
(81,238 posts)Both of them are Millennials. And both of them voted for Hillary, a choice they each came to on their own, without any prompting from me. My daughter even said, unsolicited, "he doesn't offer any concrete solutions, just a lot of complaining." She said she liked Hillary better because Hillary had specific ideas and spelled out ways to implement them. But then again, both my kids are pretty doggone practical in their thinking.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)You love it when the rich get their way and you're a sore winner. Got it.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Gothmog
(145,176 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
madamesilverspurs
(15,801 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Ridiculous.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And the constant tearing down of the party. Enough of that.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)so yes, enough of that.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Calling us corrupt and making demands against the will of the rest of us who outvoted his side is tearing us down. He can go sit down somewhere and then I will personally stfu
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)and yet you continue. So I can't believe you will ever STFU....
Egging people on is a hobby of yours.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm not calling for jail or a trial or the FBI to take him away.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)That said how do posts such as that affect you and give you permission to act as rudely???? This OP is certainly not that!
I have a theory that many Hillary supporters keep pointing ng at Bernie because they got nothing to support their candidate. So they point to the other (you know the other) to distract from the fact the got nothing.
Prove me wrong. Go celebrate Hillary's victory. Post groovy reasons we should vote for her! Go outside and plant somthing or do something you love to celebrate your victory!!! Prove you have a winner as a candidate. It will be fun!
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)I think you are spot-on... Sad but true.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...like candidate like supporter I suppose...
blackspade
(10,056 posts)This isn't warfare, it's politics. Comprise and reaching out are part of the game. The longer you PUMAs keep this up the more Democrats you alienate.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Hillary lost the nomination by a hair. She and Obama each had 48% of the popular vote. His pledged delegate advantage was only 102. Yet, she conceded 4 days after the last primary ended. At the convention she released her delegates so that Obama could be nominated by acclamation. She immediately began campaigning for Obama.
Sanders is proving to be a small man. For moths he insisted that super delegates should switch to him due to some match-up polls. Never mind that he was far behind in pledged delegates and the popular vote. He appears to at least have let go of that undemocratic strategy. Unfortunately, he has yet to concede and will go all the way to the convention with his 1,900 delegates. I guess that the party can forget a Hillary nomination by acclamation.
Sigh.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)People would be hounding her nonstop
Beacool
(30,247 posts)She wouldn't still be tilting at windmills and pointing out her differences with the nominee. She would also not hold on to her delegates at the convention and try to use them to gain concessions from the party and the nominee.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)One must have honor in their dealings, else they end up small and mean and alone
progressoid
(49,988 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)People like you are not helping Mrs. Clinton. You are not a healer, you are instigating animosity! Do carry on!
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And then get back to me and i might stfu
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)jack_krass
(1,009 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Yup.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or not, cause it sucks.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)What goes on at DU is child's play. Get out from behind the safety of your keyboard and get dirty in the real world.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Bernie is definitely a man with vision and we are going to be better for it. "Be involved, run for offices, be engaged." "We, not me."
This is a long distance run. It is nurturing and encouraging any of us fed up with the system to do something about it. If someone wants to sit on the path with arms crossed and snear "Oh please" as a deterrent, we run past the stubborn road block and keep moving forward.
The Democratic Party could have recognized that with Occupy there is growing anger at corruption and dirty politics, but chose to distance, disrupt, and disenfranchise further as they chose money over people. There is a second chance to actually pick up youth and those of us not happy with the cronyism and politics as usual. It will be interesting to see if the party will evolve or get back to where it was before Koch tentacles or not. The race and long distance run goes on with or without it.
Cha
(297,196 posts)he must have had tons of fans hanging on every word though.. no?
Excellent OP..Thank you, brave
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I know msnbc didn't. Another boring diatribe
Cha
(297,196 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Soon he will be back in the senate, in a rush to get on msnbc like the rest of the senators
Cha
(297,196 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Better not.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)They're the same network that shows an empty Trump podium for an hour.
They cover every insane rant from Trump, yet didn't even show Sanders' full speech. I guess he isn't as good for ratings.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He said nothing new so why would they bother??
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Geez, talk about pleas for attention
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Quite revolutionary. It took me by surprise. Besides, this is necessary. I promised not to post any UNNECESSARY criticism.
Cha
(297,196 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)No campaign speeches at the DNC Convention! Dang!!
betsuni
(25,486 posts)I only watched the speech once so it may have been my imagination, but I came away being a little offended at the passive-aggressive "old rich Democrats are the real problem" vibe.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)As usual. I'll believe there is some purpose to this when I see some Results.
Number23
(24,544 posts)THAT YOU POST to remind you how horrible you are (excuse me while I my ass off at these people) -- are still demanding that ransom huh?? And obviously mad as hell that they are starting to realize that it is never, EVER going to come.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)As for my FANS, I enjoy watching them get all upset by the fact that I refuse to play with them. Too boring to watch people repeat themselves and add nothing to the convo.
Response to bravenak (Original post)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)alittlelark
(18,890 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Thanks for always underscoring so vividly how wonderful Bernie is and just how appalling the alternative side is. Strengthens my resolve. Thanks a bunch.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sunsky
(1,737 posts)I must confess that I actually bought into his speeches at first, luckily I came to my senses before the primaries here in Fl. I would've been filled with regret had I voted for him.
I am very proud to be a part of the 08 revolution.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Some small changes around the margins. It's a pity. We need more than someone endlessly repeating what the Democratic Party stands for. It's long past time to start working on that but he seems blind to reality.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And we know what he'd do.... Funny to think Bernie was my first choice when he launched, and now I am just tired of the repetitive nonsense.
randome
(34,845 posts)But they're not blind to reality, either. They know who our nominee is and it's past time to start supporting her.
This latest 'bunker speech', reciting what the Democratic Party currently stands for, does no one any good. It's time he stopped preaching and started doing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He has moved on now. He really just talks about the bad but has no solutions.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)... from antisemites.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)FarPoint
(12,352 posts)All my kids support Bernie. They grew up going to DC with me, protesting Bush/ Cheney War... they attended many, many Democratic campaign events , etc... I'm just glad they continue being involved..ages now 19 to 25.😃...
One is attending Culinary School in Vermont...most understanding for him...we live in Ohio.
Jackilope
(819 posts)My Dad got me involved in a campaign he was volunteering for in '72, same year McGovern was running. (Same hometown and state as McGovern). That stuck with me. I volunteered knocking on doors in college and through my adult life. I've taken my children to labor rallies and to see Obama when he ran in '08. They see me in petition drives and knocking on doors. I am hoping they will be active and involved as well.
FarPoint
(12,352 posts)As did your parents and the tradition continues...It's a good thing. I exposed them to thinking about what was going on in life, not forcing my opinion onto them, yet educating them to seek out information, the proper channels to agree, how to collectively make community changes, to accept defeat but not give up as well.
Good job Jackilope/
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Hillary Clinton...
With this sort of ignorant, short-sighted, vitriolic bile it will be almost impossible to "bring the party together"...
Congratulations! You are the shining example of how NOT to unify the party.
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Don't waste the electrons.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)eom
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)You were never IN..
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)lib87
(535 posts)I'll enjoy watching him for entertainment purposes.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Tick, tock....
dirtydickcheney
(242 posts)Because everything i see from her gives me the impression that she's perfectly fine with it and wants to do everything in her power to help Big Money amass even more of it.
When she challenges Big Money in a way that'll hurt them its profitability let me know.
For example, Bernie effectively said he'd put the Health Insurance companies out of business and in a way that would make costs go down for the consumer.... you know? Just like EVERY OTHER DEVELOPED NATION with the exception of just one which pays at least 35% more in per-capita health care expenditure than the next highest.
That's not some 'pie-in-the-sky' platform that can't be achieved. The only reason I see that it "can't be done" is because those health care profits are just sooo magical in the USA that we live much longer and have more doctor visits than any other country... except we don't do either of those things.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)The old adage 'You either do politics or politics will be done to you' often goes a long mile even in the boomerang
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Write him off! So long to him and the supporters he rode in on! Socialist! Progressive socialist!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He doesn't own the votes of those who voted for him. Most of his former voters are now Hillary voters.
alittlelark
(18,890 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)He's completely irrelevant now (except for being extremely annoying).
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and have the banksters pick the countries leader. This democracy thing is too messy, right? Don't let anyone speak at the convention unless they show fealty to Clinton. Yikes, what has our party come to when voices for the People are shut up?
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)I'm sorry that some of you don't respect the will of the people.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)just like in 2000 and 2004. I respect the will of the People and not the will of the Banksters and Wall Street. There are a lot of Democrats that do not like Clinton and they are People with will. And of all the eligible voters very few support Hillary. Will of the People my back-pocket. The DNC didn't want a primary and why is that? They already had been told by the Big Money who would be the candidate. But the progressive voices of America have spoken and we want an honest government, not one dominated by Citizens United, Special Interests and the Billionaires. Hey I understand why some people prefer the perceived comfort of having the big bullies (major corporations) looking after them.
All Democrats agreed during the Bush Admin that we were being stripped of our voting rights, our freedoms and liberties and our resources. And since Bush it's only gotten worse for the 99%. It's unreasonable to expect an Admin that was funded by Special Interests to work to help those among us that are struggling. I guess we can tell the 2.5 million homeless children that we can't help them because we are being pragmatic.
Shame on those that side with the Big Corporations in lieu of the 99%.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hacking away at a keyboard... oh, the sacrifice!
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)What an inspiring call for inaction.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)The system is so, so rigged. He has pointed that out, shame on him? Really?
I have loved the cartoon "Non Sequitor" the last few days....the guy who writes it can be like Tom Tomorrow in pointing out our more than corrupt system as well as people who try to rationalize our inane ways.
The truth is Congress is run by legalized bribery.
coyote
(1,561 posts)Quit your moanin.
WhiteTara
(29,706 posts)I haven't heard Hillary tout her numbers, votes, delegates, volunteers. She just keeps on talking about what matters to people and her plans to make things work for all of us.
To paraphrase Bernie, "We're tired of hearing about you damn numbers"
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)Even when she lost embarrassingly and was humiliated in 2008, she made sure everyone knew exactly how many votes she received. It was fair when she did it then. There's nothing wrong with Bernie now.
WhiteTara
(29,706 posts)nominated Barrack Obama to be president. I wonder if Bernie will do that?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Based on his behavior so far, I doubt he'll even attend the convention.
WhiteTara
(29,706 posts)If he doesn't get a prime time speaking slot, I bet he won't show up either. I hadn't thought of that until you said that. That would be really sad.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... why he would have been a horrible nominee. And if he does do as I anticipate, it will help to illustrate why all of our criticisms of his being "un-presidential" (particularly his demeanor during the debates) were right on target from the very beginning.
It makes no sense for me to say that he'd have been a terrible president, because he could never actually be elected. The well-funded GOP smear machine would have thoroughly decimated him.
Go, Hillary! Beat Trump!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Rockyj
(538 posts)Preferring corruption, Wall St., voter fraud and suppression, TPP, lies, 1%, WARS & more wars!
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)But that is not the case. At all. In any way. Since the beginning on that regatta with the monochromatic afficionados.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)racism and with you, you put your less than 45 yrs. old foot out there so all could see..
wish you luck in shedding what you have posted in the past..
Response to juxtaposed (Reply #280)
bravenak This message was self-deleted by its author.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I notice that most of those folks said not one word, not one peep and many even rec'd the posts of the anti black banned troll willyt. Not a word did they say to him about his many anti black posts, not one apology for the nasty stockholm syndrome vileness. But they follow me around and pray for my soul. Cracks me up.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)I've dealt with hate all my life as most of use have. Weather being the subject of or witness of hate, I think most ppl. have experienced it. I just got back from Orlando where I spent a week seeing what one person with so much hate could do that has effected so many. physically and emotionally I am exhausted.
I do not respect you b/c of what you have posted elsewhere.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have been the subject of many posts right here calling me durty name and being hateful. I have many screenshots of even folks using the n word on this very site that I send to admins. I watched folks defend the right to call Obama 'niggerized' on this very site. I never once saw you denounce that vile racialized name calling of Barack Obama so I take the idea of your respect towards me with a grain of salt.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)think of spell checkers aka: (spelling nazi's).
bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Orlando is what happens when ones hate of others is not called into check.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Reply #311)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Reply #313)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I'm not sure how anybody could take you seriously any longer.
I don't.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If anybody is shit stirring, it's all these people with a bunch of hides that follow m from op to op. I would think that if I was just full of shit, people would ignore me. But since I predicted this outcome every step of the way, people seem to blame me for their loss. No. It was their own damn behaviour in thinking they were smarter and better than folks like me that made them to proud to win.
You guys can stop taking it out on me now and start taking credit for any failures you all might have. Because you kicking a few days old thread just to be mad that I wrote it is ridiculous. You ain't all that Yourself.
It's only shit stirring if I don't agree with you. The same hypocrites that follow me to shut me up never say one damn word to the people trolling against the actual damn nominee, hillary.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Jus stirring the pot.
There are posts of yours where you were priding yourself on being an irritant while being warned, by somebody that was still on your side, to stop.
The Internet remembers, brave.
You are a shadow of what you once were IMHO.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Damn near cultists this season and I just don't do that fucking swooning over politicians thing. Not even with obama. What you see is me speaking blasphemy and no victim here. Most of my fans will be gone soon and I am delighted.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)You earned your own bad press. Deal.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That's why i could not stand it at all. Politicians are shits. Swooning over them is creepy as hell.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I guess you like the world we have. OK, that's just OK. Me, I am sick to fucking death of the system. Blow it all the fuck up already.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am. Like most millennials I will help shape the future and it will not look like his base. It will look like America and not be stuck on old ideas of the past as the pathway to the future. I hate the nostalgic look backs to the times in america where blacks were treated like crap.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)But really Brave, you are the future? Just shoot me.
Ms. 7wo7tees
Oh, by the way, I am 59.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)But whatever opiate gets you through the off-time...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I tend to think they must be boring as hell in real life.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I would have to say you want it.
Still sad.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Boring
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)From yesterday.
Your retort is a little silly now. No?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Are you going to ignore that if you create an OP you should expect others to respond??
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Complain all you want, feel free.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Deal with it.
But I also understand your MO. Write and OP that stirs it up then complain when everybody points that out.
It must be pretty lonely where you are if this is the only way to deal with humans.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If you hate it so much, stop kicking it.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)There is no "we", my dear. I am not part of any conspiracy.
Nobody is after you WRT this post AFAIK. When you make hollow statements then just own them instead of playing the victim or saying "leave me alone."
It appears more juvenile each time I see one of these posts only to watch the authors cry when they get called on it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm not. I don't mind you kicking it, but you seem to mind it's existance.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)It is irrelevant as a point of discussion. Whether an OP is kicked or not is a non-starter.
What is more interesting, thought, is when you became an attention hound or drama queen.
Perhaps you were one all along? :Shrug:
Posting flame bait to keep attention on oneself is a rather obvious tool for those who desperately crave the spotlight.
You have already owned up to others in previous posts as to what you have been doing here.
Own it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)and lob personal attacks my way. If this is how you enjoy yourself, who am I to stand in your way? We both know I don't care what anybody who despises me thinks about me, since they are strangers. But I guess you think your words affect me, so I can politely watch you Get yourself lathered up for a while. If you enjoy the idea of me being oh so very saddened by your displeasure, that's cool. Kinda funny, and I enjoy a laugh as much as the next person. Got my doobie and my bic so keep em comin, lol
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)It is almost the same level of obsession that shira possesses.
As to angry, you really don't know how to read people nearly as well as you believe that you do.
But as to reading you... The internet is full of your posts.
Have fun with your doobie, but smoking isn't necessarily good for you.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And I will fight you for the bullet.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The establishment exists to preserve/protect white privilege.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)willing to stand up and demand changes that expand social justice and call for desperately needed changes in this country.
Vote early, vote often, vote Democrat.
Logical
(22,457 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And many other issues
ThinkCritically
(241 posts)I keep trying to like Hillary supporters but I just can't like some of you. You are incredibly arrogant, rude, and just plain mean people. But that's ok. You see how well that is going to help you in the future.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
senseandsensibility This message was self-deleted by its author.
ThinkCritically
(241 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)He can count me OUT
melman
(7,681 posts)How is that anything but trolling?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, at least, severely penalized for failure to wave pom-poms vigorously.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I like a turkey, bacon, avacado, with colby jack when I am not interested in voting. I usually go and vote, but no pomp and circumstance. I have only liked my candidate for any office one time. Barack Obama. They rest are just fillers.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I like my candidates for office just fine and will vote for one of them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Turin_C3PO
(13,979 posts)Site Admin said that these kinda posts against all progressives, especially Clinton, but also against Sanders have to stop tomorrow.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)This is from Thursday And you guys keep it kicked.
Turin_C3PO
(13,979 posts)I just saw it up on top of page, I didn't see date. I'm full on for Hillary, I just want the Primary bickering to stop.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Probably a more concise way to say that.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Though we all word things to suit ourselves, concise or not.