Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:46 AM Jun 2016

Voter Turnout in UK Referendum: 72%

Compare that to the 35% we typically get in the US for major elections. Think about that. Our electoral system needs serious reform. Automatic voter registration when someone turns 18. Open primaries.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voter Turnout in UK Referendum: 72% (Original Post) HerbChestnut Jun 2016 OP
if only WE had those kind of numbers MFM008 Jun 2016 #1
In a country that prides itself on representative democracy, we should have those numbers HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #2
Open primaries has shit all to do with people who show up in the general La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #3
When people don't get a say in the primaries... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #4
They would get a say if they could commit to a party La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #5
But what if they don't like the parties... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #6
You seem to assume that open primaries mean that the candidate you want will win La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #7
That type of closed mindedness is what's driving people away from the party HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #8
It's really not hard to register with a party to vote in their primary KingFlorez Jun 2016 #9
Additionally the parties have a right to want to control who runs on their ticket La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #11
You and I don't think it's hard... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #12
It's not a dig at Bernie, it's a fact that he lost more open primaries La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #10
Trump became the nominee because the majority of Republicans voted for him HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #13
Yes, the majority of republican primary voters who are not a large number La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #14
And overturned the will of the people HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #15
Their primary this time was not like the democratic primary La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #16
He was also running against a dozen opponents while Hillary really only had 1 HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #17
Yes and 17 would not have run if superdelegates came out in favor of someone La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #18
Maybe, maybe not. HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #19
Point is also a party should maintain some control over their nominee La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #20
Just wait until the convention HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #21
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
2. In a country that prides itself on representative democracy, we should have those numbers
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:49 AM
Jun 2016

It shows how out of touch our government is and how badly we need electoral reform.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
4. When people don't get a say in the primaries...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:53 AM
Jun 2016

They don't feel as attached to the candidates in the general. We should be encouraging people to vote in *all* elections, not just a few.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
5. They would get a say if they could commit to a party
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jun 2016

It's not like people have to pay dues to vote, it's not out of reach.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
6. But what if they don't like the parties...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:57 AM
Jun 2016

Or what if sometimes they support Republican candidates and other times support Democrats? What if they usually vote Republican but this one time wanted to vote Democrat? There's all kinds of reasons people shouldn't have to be part of a party to vote in the primary.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
7. You seem to assume that open primaries mean that the candidate you want will win
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:03 AM
Jun 2016

hence you'll vote. there is no guarantee that will happen. For instance Bernie has been screaming about open primaries although Hillary won more of the open primaries, so she would have won anyway. Would your voter who is not a committed democrat and whose candidate lost, show up to vote for her?

If you can't commit to the goals of the democratic part, you have no business picking our nominee.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
8. That type of closed mindedness is what's driving people away from the party
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:08 AM
Jun 2016

When the country is dominated by a 2 party system that is hellbent on maintaining control, you better believe everyone should have the right to vote in the primaries. Btw nice dig on Bernie there. Gotta love the unity, right?

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
9. It's really not hard to register with a party to vote in their primary
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:13 AM
Jun 2016

Parties set their own rules because they are private. If Republicans had have had more closed primaries, Trump would not be their nominee.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
11. Additionally the parties have a right to want to control who runs on their ticket
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:17 AM
Jun 2016

I bet the republicans are really jealous of super delegates right now.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
12. You and I don't think it's hard...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:17 AM
Jun 2016

But for the average person who doesn't pay close attention to politics the rules are outright arcane. NY is the perfect example; having to register 6 months before the primary or you can't vote. It's ridiculous. Then there's each state's individual set of rules regarding whether independents can or can't vote, what types of ballots they receive, provisional ballots, etc. The whole thing is a mess. Simple open primaries solve that problem.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
10. It's not a dig at Bernie, it's a fact that he lost more open primaries
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:15 AM
Jun 2016

It's not close mindedness to not want people who don't endorse the Democratic Party platform from picking our candidate. the parties have a right to want to maintain some control over their primaries, for fear of someone like trump becoming the nominee.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
14. Yes, the majority of republican primary voters who are not a large number
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:18 AM
Jun 2016

If they had super delegates, someone else would have won.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
15. And overturned the will of the people
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:19 AM
Jun 2016

What kind of chaos do you think would have occurred if that had happened?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
16. Their primary this time was not like the democratic primary
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:22 AM
Jun 2016

Where Hillary won by a huge number in the popular vote. He won a plurality but not a majority in the popular vote (33%, I think). Had Marco or someone else had more establishment support via pledged super delegates, this whole thing could have gone very differently.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
17. He was also running against a dozen opponents while Hillary really only had 1
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jun 2016

I don't know what the final vote tally is, but I'm willing to bet he got more than 33%.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
18. Yes and 17 would not have run if superdelegates came out in favor of someone
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jun 2016

It would have narrowed the field considerably

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
20. Point is also a party should maintain some control over their nominee
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:28 AM
Jun 2016

So they don't end up with crazy garbage like trump.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voter Turnout in UK Refer...