How come no reporters give Clinton the benefit of the doubt?

[LAS14]

Since there were NO e-mails that were marked properly with headers, and only 3 that were marked at all (with little (c)'s buried in the text... which Comey agreed anyone might miss), why is it not a possibility that she genuinely did not think that any "classified" e-mails had been received?

Why would she lie, for crying out loud, when she knew the FBI was looking at them?

What's wrong with the system when the positive interpretation is verboten?

[unblock]

1. the system is run by republicans.

or at least, rich people interested only with their own profit and wealth.

which is to say, republicans.

[apcalc]

2. The power in the msm is white male republican .

[unitedwethrive]

3. They love going after Hillary, always have.

My guess is that it is a cross between repug owned media corporations, and misogyny.

[FarPoint]

4. They make the bar so high for Hillary...

You would think it was the Olympic High Jump or Pole Vault....Trumps...Limbo rock level....or maybe it's a gutter/ puddle jump standard.... Vast difference in standard.

[lapucelle]

5. What's amazing is that the press gave Comey the benefit of the doubt

and he still has it.

If the Republicans had not tried to milk the moment, we would never have known exactly how deceptive and equivocal Comey was when he made his statement.

http://dailyhowler.blogspot.com/2016/08/did-clinton-email-secret-stuff.html