Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would love to hear from Nate Silver and his ilk... (Original Post) LAS14 Oct 2016 OP
Silver is a statistician BainsBane Oct 2016 #1
But his job is to understand how to make... LAS14 Oct 2016 #5
Yes, and he adjusts his model to make it more accurate BainsBane Oct 2016 #8
I dunno - OhZone Oct 2016 #2
Dunno about UK, but a big part of the Columbia... LAS14 Oct 2016 #4
Colombia alcibiades_mystery Oct 2016 #7
Brexit is often cited but was different remaineruk Oct 2016 #3
If democrats stay home and not vote trump wins...what else do you beachbumbob Oct 2016 #6
lolz obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #9
Keeping hope alive alcibiades_mystery Oct 2016 #11
Well, for one thing they'd have to be registering. n/t pnwmom Oct 2016 #10
I don't think he will tell you that, but..... Adrahil Oct 2016 #12
Three reasons. Imperialism Inc. Oct 2016 #13

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
1. Silver is a statistician
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 02:04 PM
Oct 2016

He creates statistical models and talks about the numbers. He's not a sage of the future. What you ask isn't in his purview.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
5. But his job is to understand how to make...
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 02:08 PM
Oct 2016

... polls accurately reflect voter sentiment and commitment to vote. He writes all the time about why polls differ and which are the most reliable.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
8. Yes, and he adjusts his model to make it more accurate
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 02:36 PM
Oct 2016

but polls don't foretell the future. They are a snapshot of opinion in a moment in time.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
4. Dunno about UK, but a big part of the Columbia...
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 02:07 PM
Oct 2016

... reporting was how no one saw it coming. Polls didn't suggest this result. Don't know how energetic polling is in Columbia. But do understand it was a big surprise.

remaineruk

(156 posts)
3. Brexit is often cited but was different
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 02:06 PM
Oct 2016

Until the brutul murder of MP Jo Cox the leave vote was polling very well. It softened and then reverted back on voting

Also we didn't have a) trump b) nukes c) the government to vote on. And it was a binary vote. But we have shot our selves in the proverbial.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. I don't think he will tell you that, but.....
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 03:23 PM
Oct 2016

They did just do an analysis that the registration of new voters seems to slightly favor Clinton in swing states. However, if a large number of white voters who typically don't vote turn out? All bets are off. Turn out models reflect some assumptions. That's why the polls disagree... sometimes by a lot. Or in the case of the USC/Dornsife poll, some really weird methodology.

Imperialism Inc.

(2,495 posts)
13. Three reasons.
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 03:30 PM
Oct 2016

1) The polls actually showed close decision in Brexit so it wasn't a major upset. It was the prediction markets that failed not polls.

2) Republicans are losing the registration battle as far as we can tell

3) 80% of the people that voted for Trump in the primaries had also voted in the 2012 presidential election, so there is no reason to suspect he is actually drawing in new voters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Would love to hear from N...