2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Most Important WikiLeaks Revelation Isn’t About Hillary Clinton.
What John Podestas emails from 2008 reveal about the way power works in the Democratic Party.
'The most important revelation in the WikiLeaks dump of John Podestas emails has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. The messages go all the way back to 2008, when Podesta served as co-chair of President-elect Barack Obamas transition team. And a month before the election, the key staffing for that future administration was almost entirely in place, revealing that some of the most crucial decisions an administration can make occur well before a vote has been cast.
Michael Froman, who is now U.S. trade representative but at the time was an executive at Citigroup, wrote an email to Podesta on October 6, 2008, with the subject Lists. Froman used a Citigroup email address. He attached three documents: a list of women for top administration jobs, a list of non-white candidates, and a sample outline of 31 cabinet-level positions and who would fill them. The lists will continue to grow, Froman wrote to Podesta, but these are the names to date that seem to be coming up as recommended by various sources for senior level jobs.
The cabinet list ended up being almost entirely on the money. It correctly identified Eric Holder for the Justice Department, Janet Napolitano for Homeland Security, Robert Gates for Defense, Rahm Emanuel for chief of staff, Peter Orszag for the Office of Management and Budget, Arne Duncan for Education, Eric Shinseki for Veterans Affairs, Kathleen Sebelius for Health and Human Services, Melody Barnes for the Domestic Policy Council, and more. For the Treasury, three possibilities were on the list: Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner. . .
The Rubin school dictated the Obama administrations light-touch policy on bank misconduct (which resulted in no serious legal or fiduciary consequences for the major players) and its first-term approach to the financial crisis (which was defined by a stimulus package that even at the time was criticized for being woefully inadequate, as well as a premature turn to budget-cutting). These are exactly the flaws that Geldon, Warrens emissary, stressed. According to Schwerin, he spoke repeatedly about the need to have in place people with ambition and urgency who recognize how much the middle class is hurting and are willing to challenge the financial industry.
Around the same time as that meeting with Geldon, the Clinton campaign was setting up a dinner meeting with its economic policy team, Geithner, Summers, and members of the investment firm Blackstone (along with Teresa Ghilarducci, a retirement security researcher).
This is a fight over who dominates the Democratic Partys policy thinking in the short and long term. In 2008 the fight was invisible and one-sided, and the fix was in. In 2016 both sides are angling to get Clinton to adopt their framework. Those predisposed to consider Clinton some neoliberal sap might not agree, but this is actually a live ball. Presidents lead coalitions, and they have to understand where their coalition is and how things change over time. Peter Orszag this week suggested a trade-off: Give the Warren wing its choices on personnel, in exchange for more leeway to negotiate an infrastructure package with Republicans that gives big tax breaks to corporations with money stashed overseas. While that deal needs more detail, it reveals the power the Warren wing has, relative to the Obama era, to make significant strides on appointments.
Which side will win? The rank and file can actually have a voice in this, to make it known what personnel decisions would be acceptable or unacceptable. They cant do it by ignoring evidence or sitting on their hands. The demand to only hold one thing in your head at a timethat Trump must be stoppedwould squander this opportunity.'
https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)among many options with various sets benefits of tradeoffs, by Obama and his administration. No news, or "revelations," here.
There are a number good books out on this period, btw, and a lot of bad ones. Although no doubt historians and social scientists are combing through the leaked documents for new details, this stuff is not secret.
splat
(2,294 posts)The names for SoS were "Kerry/Dodd"; Hillary wasn't on that list then.
She does appear as a candidate in a separate Women list:
Hillary Clinton State, HHS
Source: It's in the attachment to this email