Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
unless something drastic happens... he can't win (Original Post) MissMillie Oct 2016 OP
I love that song by steam. dubyadiprecession Oct 2016 #2
Not true oberliner Oct 2016 #3
I trust Nate Silver... he's been very accurate MissMillie Oct 2016 #4
Nevada and Iowa oberliner Oct 2016 #6
Yeah... I saw that MissMillie Oct 2016 #7
You can trust whoever you want. LisaL Oct 2016 #15
What's with NH?? ailsagirl Oct 2016 #9
Polls don't reflect recent events yet, really NT Adrahil Oct 2016 #11
Good point. Wonder how long it will take... ailsagirl Oct 2016 #12
Silver gives NH to HRC MissMillie Oct 2016 #14
80% probability is not 100 % probability. LisaL Oct 2016 #16
Of course not MissMillie Oct 2016 #18
NH is not a toss up. geek tragedy Oct 2016 #17
Never say never Dem2 Oct 2016 #5
Even if something drastic happens, he can't win Generic Brad Oct 2016 #8
I think Wikileaks was supposed to be the October Surprise. Iggo Oct 2016 #10
Assange was right Jamaal510 Oct 2016 #13
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
3. Not true
Sat Oct 15, 2016, 09:39 AM
Oct 2016

Recent polling shows NH as a toss-up and Ohio as leaning Trump.

He can still take NC, FL, and AZ.

That would do it.

I think Florida will decide the election again.

MissMillie

(38,553 posts)
4. I trust Nate Silver... he's been very accurate
Sat Oct 15, 2016, 10:47 PM
Oct 2016

He says she has 337 electoral college votes.

AND even if she loses NH, NC, FL and AZ..... she still has 278 electoral votes.

NH is in the bag for Clinton, and FL is more than just a little promising.


http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
6. Nevada and Iowa
Sat Oct 15, 2016, 10:50 PM
Oct 2016

I can see those going either way.

Of course, the most likely scenario is HRC winning (as Nate Silver indicates),

But there are still 14 out of 100 scenarios where Trump wins according to Silver.

MissMillie

(38,553 posts)
7. Yeah... I saw that
Sat Oct 15, 2016, 10:51 PM
Oct 2016

I'll take those odds.


on edit:

Just went back to fivethirtyeight.com and counted ONLY the bluest of blue states (higher than an 80% chance of winning).

She has 251 with those states.

And Mr. Trump may be competitive in NV (where Clinton is favored to win 72+ percent) , IA, OH, NC, FL (where Clinton is favored to win 73+ percent), and AZ.... but he won't win all of them.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
15. You can trust whoever you want.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 08:40 AM
Oct 2016

What is obvious is that some states are very close. So "he can't win" statement isn't accurate. To say the least.

ailsagirl

(22,896 posts)
9. What's with NH??
Sat Oct 15, 2016, 11:25 PM
Oct 2016

After all that's gone down the past week, capping it off with our First Lady's passionate speech, it's still not enough to persuade intelligent people to vote for HRC?

UN-believable

MissMillie

(38,553 posts)
18. Of course not
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 09:16 AM
Oct 2016

But Silver has a record of being quite accurate. He pretty much nailed the 2012 election.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
13. Assange was right
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 05:09 AM
Oct 2016

about one thing: there's an October Surprise, except it had nothing to do with anything from Wikileaks, and it is negatively impacting Trump rather than Clinton.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»unless something drastic ...