Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's a distraction! Full frontal nude Trump photo emerges.
Experts are analyzing the three pixels from a cell phone snapshot that purportedly show Der Drumpf's junk in the photo. It's unclear what is visible, really. Inconclusive evidence of his physical attributes.
Three pixels of shame!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
19 replies, 1686 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's a distraction! Full frontal nude Trump photo emerges. (Original Post)
MineralMan
Oct 2016
OP
louis-t
(23,292 posts)1. Why did I click on this?
Why....why...why?
Sophiegirl
(2,338 posts)2. You aren't alone
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)8. Excellent question. Were you expecting to see
Donald's "precious" here on DU?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)12. The word nude in the title. That's why I'm here.
As a woman, it's in my DNA.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)18. Trust me. There was literally nothing to see.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)3. LOL - Squirrel! nt
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)9. Shiny squirrel!
jonno99
(2,620 posts)13. No doubt - sheesh...nt
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)4. Exactly, a distraction is being pulled off with great effect and lots of lemmings going over the ...
onecent
(6,096 posts)5. I don't see where I can push the 3 pixels of shame?????
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)6. Guess I'm lucky,
there is no link to click.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)15. See, we're not supposed to link to obscene material, no matter how small.
I wouldn't do that, of course...
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)19. Of course not!
TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts)7. So, it's official. Trump's junk is smaller than Osama bin Laden's.
.
To see Trump's junk, you'll need more that nine magnifying lenses.
?width=480
.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)10. Thanks for the laugh. I immediately click on anything that reads "nude."
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)11. Gotcha, eh?
C'est pour rire.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)14. The word "nude" was in the thread title.
My inner seventh-grader can't help wanting to know more.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)17. Imagine what might happen if I'd added "email"
to the title. DU would go down as though a DDOS attack had happened.
Clickety-click...
zenabby
(364 posts)16. Thank you!
My increasingly hypertensive day needed that laugh. I don't know what I expected - but bwahahahahahahaha.. this was too funny.