I recommend the Upshot over Five Thirty Eight for feeling a little better

[LAS14]

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html

[Dem2]

1. Maybe drop a link here

I don't have it in my politics folder.

[getagrip_already]

2. this one?

http://www.nytimes.com/section/upshot

[Farmgirl1961]

3. link?

All the other polls are pretty stable, with the exception of Five Thirty Eight. I know everyone says, just dismiss it, but it kind of glares out there begging for attention.

[Demsrule86]

4. thanks!

[Demsrule86]

5. Thanks

[LAS14]

6. Link to the Upshot

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html

[Fast Walker 52]

7. the Princeton consortium has always been very favorable to Hillary and more than 538

currently she has a 98-99% chance of winning

http://election.princeton.edu/faq/

[LAS14]

9. Do you know how long this has been around? It's history of accuracy?

I believe the Upshot is fairly new, but I'm not sure about that.

[jcgoldie]

10. Sam Wang at PEC has had that site up since 2008 I believe

And his accuracy has rivaled 538.

edit to add the about page says 2004: http://election.princeton.edu/about/

[LAS14]

12. Thanks!

[Dem2]

8. I like how they compare their predictions to the competitors

That's a super useful table.

[LAS14]

11. I saw that once but can't find it again. Can you give me a script or a link?

Or a script to get there would be better so I don't have to save one more link.

[Dem2]

13. it's on this page farthur down

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?_r=0

[LAS14]

15. Ah! Thanks!

[Towlie]

14. So Trump's chance is better than 3 coin flips all landing heads.

I'd feel better if it was 3 coin flips all landing on edge.