2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRaidel
(18 posts)so they have bigger sample sizes...just my thought
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)As I understand it, it isnt just random samples like public polling. They have access to a lot of information based on previous voting histories. It's a different animal.
vdogg
(1,384 posts)They literally know where each and every voter is, their party affiliation, and their voter history and thus their propensity to vote. Public polls don't have this.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)vdogg
(1,384 posts)News organizations just aren't going to be able to afford to poll in that detail in al 50 states. They have to target their resources.
RAFisher
(466 posts)For $5 the Florida Secretary of State will mail you a CD with gigabytes of voter data. Demographics (address,race, age, party) for every single voter in the state and a complete history of every Florida election he or she had voted in. So that's definitely not true in Florida because it's public data.
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)they go out and talk voters...polling Companies are working off the last election.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)More money, means more samples taken, more up to date voter info, fewer assumptions they can make, etc. Taking a poll probably isn't a huge money maker for a media company but a campaign can afford to throw money at better quality polls because they don't have to make a profit after.
futureliveshere
(1,412 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)futureliveshere
(1,412 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,855 posts)is that they have a strong vested interest in getting it right every bit as much as they have a strong vested interest in supporting the candidate.
That said, I haven't a clue how they might sample compared to how other polls might sample.
For what it's worth, I recall seeing something some years back about the 1992 election, and how Bill Clinton's internal polls show he was likely to win. And their exit polls (almost no states had early voting back then) on election were such that by 10 am they knew Bill would win. But they had to play it cool until it was official.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)News outfits just want a story, and closer is better
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Sure, sometimes you'll nail it. That allows arrogant Op-Eds like the one linked in this thread from Obama's 2012 campaign pollster. We're supposed to be amazed and in awe.
However, that Op-Ed itself demonstrated how absurd the premise was. That 2012 race was Obama's second rodeo, not the first. If Obama's team had already demonstrated that internal polls are the ultimate gold standard and that public polls are mostly laughable, you wouldn't have Obama pulling the chief pollster aside on election eve of his second race and asking what is going on.
Maybe it takes a handicapper to understand that. I also have an advantage because I worked behind the scenes in another profession with tons of aura attached -- sports oddsmakers. The public always wants to believe Las Vegas has some type of mysterious behind the scenes knowledge. Yeah, like frantic phone calls to make sure employees actually show up. Like averaging power ratings to stick a pointspread on the board. Then you sit back and hope somebody outs you on the air, so you can pretend there is indeed a secret sauce.
marlakay
(11,464 posts)You ask who people are voting for and send info to campaign.