Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFinal national NBC/WSJ poll of '16 race HRC +4 - +5
Clinton 44
Trump 40
Johnson 6
Stein 2
2way
Clinton 48
Trump 43
Nov 3-5, MOE +/- 2.7
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 944 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Final national NBC/WSJ poll of '16 race HRC +4 - +5 (Original Post)
Cattledog
Nov 2016
OP
And Obama won by 4% or 5 million votes. What was the proverbial margin of error?
BlueStreak
Nov 2016
#8
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)1. Thank GAWD majority of these polls both national and state are doing their final
projections. Whew
RelativelyJones
(898 posts)2. Will Johnson really get 6?
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)6. No way. And that illustrates the fallacy of polling.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)4. Compared to 2012 this is excellent, final polls, had a tie or +-1
book_worm
(15,951 posts)5. By point of reference the final NBC/WSJ poll in 2012 had Obama up by 1
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)8. And Obama won by 4% or 5 million votes. What was the proverbial margin of error?
Probably 3%. Statistical nonsense, these polls. Wrap a bunch of scientific words around the polls and people start to believe it is a science.
In reality, there is so much polling going on the quality is extremely low. They should be regarded as one indicator among many -- not the final word. In this instance, it seems to me that the unmeasured factors lean toward Clinton -- especially the ground organizations.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)7. I'll take it. Plus it's outside the MoE. K&R
Now I just need to sleep some the next couple of nights.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)10. Hey, no worries, this poll DROPPED her chances by 1.1% on 538!
And all was well in the world.