Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why weren't the deplorables who beat the slightly less deplorable (Original Post) ghostsinthemachine Nov 2016 OP
I think the focus at the time was to get Trump into new underwear. bmpbmp Nov 2016 #1
The "slightly less deplorable" is the kind of person who rzemanfl Nov 2016 #2
The same reason why a squirrel is a squirrel. It doesn't know anything else besides being a squirrel TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #4
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

bmpbmp

(310 posts)
1. I think the focus at the time was to get Trump into new underwear.
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 11:56 AM
Nov 2016

Is that the change Republicans have been calling for?

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
2. The "slightly less deplorable" is the kind of person who
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 11:58 AM
Nov 2016

could help save the two party system in this country from becoming fascists vs. democrats. I can remember when I could speak to Republicans without wanting to vomit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why weren't the deplorabl...