Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SDANation

(419 posts)
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 01:40 PM Nov 2016

Any catch Nate Silver spin, spin spinning on ABC?

Bad mouthing PEC model design and discounting the early vote? Totally trying to cover his ass. But he admitted and I agree, his model is based off of state polling only and every poll gets thrown in. So then his model would be inaccurate if he didn't include early voting data correct?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any catch Nate Silver spin, spin spinning on ABC? (Original Post) SDANation Nov 2016 OP
I don't take his stuff as "spin" Jarqui Nov 2016 #1
Isn't that also true of Sam Wang's model? Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #2
Are Republicans being polled lying to avoid being outed for rejecting Trump? GeorgeOrtega Nov 2016 #3
both Sam Wang(PEC) and Nate Cohn(NYT)'s models are stable radius777 Nov 2016 #8
If the margin is 6 - 8% Blue Idaho Nov 2016 #10
Another question about his model DLCWIdem Nov 2016 #19
We have no idea who is paying Nate Silver Democat Nov 2016 #13
He is running a website now- he depends on clicks redstateblues Nov 2016 #16
a poem forjusticethunders Nov 2016 #15
I have a question about polling in general DLCWIdem Nov 2016 #17
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
1. I don't take his stuff as "spin"
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 01:43 PM
Nov 2016

His "model" may need some adjustment but I think he's a pretty honest guy

GeorgeOrtega

(8 posts)
3. Are Republicans being polled lying to avoid being outed for rejecting Trump?
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 01:45 PM
Nov 2016

I wonder if anyone has explored the potential skewing effect of Republican voters, especially in Red states, telling pollsters that they are voting for Trump when they're actually not because they are afraid of sham GOTV phone banking calls whose real intent is to expose defectors to their close-minded and potentially vindictive, (i.e., employers) neighbors?

radius777

(3,635 posts)
8. both Sam Wang(PEC) and Nate Cohn(NYT)'s models are stable
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 01:58 PM
Nov 2016

compared to Silver's, who is a good guy (and not a GOP shill as some suggest) with integrity, but whose model is clearly designed (imo) to get clicks and create conversation as well.

To be fair, Silver has explained why he thinks this volatility in his model is justified, as the polls have swung more sharply with the news (H's fainting episode, Access Hollywood tapes, Comey-gate, etc) which has covered the election like a reality show (thus scaring voters), and historically there are many more undecideds than usual.

Both Wang and Cohn and most gurus are predicting a comfortable (but maybe not landslide - thanks to Benedict Comey) win, Matthew Dowd said today he thinks the popular vote margin is going to be bigger than Obama's 4% in 2012, that all of the data shows this.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
19. Another question about his model
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 03:46 PM
Nov 2016

In 4 way polling is he including the number of Stein and Johnson voters in his instability, assuming they are undecideds?

Democat

(11,617 posts)
13. We have no idea who is paying Nate Silver
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 02:16 PM
Nov 2016

If it turns out he's very wrong, then at least he may have a career with Fox News or Trump TV.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
16. He is running a website now- he depends on clicks
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 02:44 PM
Nov 2016

I think he becomes more like cable news- banking on a horse race- he needs more than Dems looking at his website. He has a big operation to fund- trying to give hope to both sides- if you read his analysis he always hedges whatever conclusion he comes to.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
17. I have a question about polling in general
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 03:11 PM
Nov 2016

When they poll a population and find out the person already voted do they discount, or are people who already voted included in the sample?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Any catch Nate Silver spi...