Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNewsweek story this AM: "Comey is unfit for public service."
Eichenwald. Excerpts:
James Comey should not simply be fired as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He must be barred forever from any form of public service.
In the last 10 days, Comey has whipsawed the election for president of the United States. Now we know he did it for no reason. When his agents found information that suggested there were emails on a laptop that might have relevance to the investigation of Hillary Clinton and her email servers, Comey did not wait until he knew even a scintilla of information before announcing it to the world. Reasonably, lots of voters assumed there must be a there therewho could imagine a person with the power of the FBI director would turn the election on its head for no particular reason, on the basis of nothing?
Then, Sunday, Comey handed down another missive from on high: Never mind. His agents had looked through the emails and decided they were piffle. His majesty, the FBI director, has not yet deigned to officially inform his subjectsthe American peoplewhether the emails related to the Clinton case or what they were. (However, people involved in the case tell Newsweek that almost all of them were duplicates of what the bureau already had or were personal.) He just said nothing to see here and waived us on our way.
Well, forget it, Jim. Were not moving on. America has just witnessed one of the mostif not the mostegregious abuses of power in the service of one mans ego in its history. Joseph McCarthy and A. Mitchell Palmer at least believed they were fighting a Communist threat. Richard Nixon, in Watergate, at least had the motive of retaining power and covering up wrongdoing. But Comeywho I do not believe did this for partisan reasonshas no such motive. This was about him, about preserving his now forever-destroyed reputation, about preening with his self-satisfied standing as a maverick who acts based on what he thinks is right, regardless of others opinion. But there is a very thin line between being independent and being reckless. And Comey has demonstrated he does not know the difference.
In the last 10 days, Comey has whipsawed the election for president of the United States. Now we know he did it for no reason. When his agents found information that suggested there were emails on a laptop that might have relevance to the investigation of Hillary Clinton and her email servers, Comey did not wait until he knew even a scintilla of information before announcing it to the world. Reasonably, lots of voters assumed there must be a there therewho could imagine a person with the power of the FBI director would turn the election on its head for no particular reason, on the basis of nothing?
Then, Sunday, Comey handed down another missive from on high: Never mind. His agents had looked through the emails and decided they were piffle. His majesty, the FBI director, has not yet deigned to officially inform his subjectsthe American peoplewhether the emails related to the Clinton case or what they were. (However, people involved in the case tell Newsweek that almost all of them were duplicates of what the bureau already had or were personal.) He just said nothing to see here and waived us on our way.
Well, forget it, Jim. Were not moving on. America has just witnessed one of the mostif not the mostegregious abuses of power in the service of one mans ego in its history. Joseph McCarthy and A. Mitchell Palmer at least believed they were fighting a Communist threat. Richard Nixon, in Watergate, at least had the motive of retaining power and covering up wrongdoing. But Comeywho I do not believe did this for partisan reasonshas no such motive. This was about him, about preserving his now forever-destroyed reputation, about preening with his self-satisfied standing as a maverick who acts based on what he thinks is right, regardless of others opinion. But there is a very thin line between being independent and being reckless. And Comey has demonstrated he does not know the difference.
Link: http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-unfit-public-service-517815
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1988 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (58)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newsweek story this AM: "Comey is unfit for public service." (Original Post)
kstewart33
Nov 2016
OP
AirmensMom
(14,642 posts)2. Another kick.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)5. he did it for his Party
didn't he? What was all the brouhaha about violation of The Hatch Act. He just did it for himself, do I have this OP correct. And if the latter is true, then he is a very dangerous loose cannon if it was the former reason he's still a very dangerous loose cannon whose hands should be removed from the reins of power. Period.
kwolf68
(7,365 posts)6. Charge this guy
I can tell you right effing now if this had been done in the service FOR Democrats to sway an election the right wingers would be going crazy - as they should.
Do NOT let this guy slide. This was a contemptible act, a true perversion of our democracy and illegal.
manicraven
(901 posts)7. Time for hearings! Oh, and don't forget Rudy Giuliani!
They're stains on democracy!