2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrumps big infrastructure plan? Its a Trump con trap: goes to investors, few jobs...
I think this is well worth your time to read--and pass around
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-big-infrastructure-plan-its-a-trap/2016/11/18/5b1d109c-adae-11e6-8b45-f8e493f06fcd_story.html?utm_term=.b61dc62a8230
Opinions
Trumps big infrastructure plan? Its a trap.
Ronald A. Klain served as assistant to President Obama and oversaw the team implementing the American Recovery and Renewal Act from 2009-2011. He was an adviser to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 campaign. The views expressed here are solely his own.
As the White House official responsible for overseeing implementation of President Obamas massive infrastructure initiative, the 2009 Recovery Act, Ive got a simple message for Democrats who are embracing President-elect Donald Trumps infrastructure plan: Dont do it. Its a trap. Backing Trumps plan is a mistake in policy and political judgment they will regret, as did their Democratic predecessors who voted for Ronald Reagans tax cuts in 1981 and George W. Bushs cuts in 2001.
First, Trumps plan is not really an infrastructure plan. Its a tax-cut plan for utility-industry and construction-sector investors, and a massive corporate welfare plan for contractors. The Trump plan doesnt directly fund new roads, bridges, water systems or airports, as did Hillary Clintons 2016 infrastructure proposal. Instead, Trumps plan provides tax breaks to private-sector investors who back profitable construction projects. These projects (such as electrical grid modernization or energy pipeline expansion) might already be planned or even underway. Theres no requirement that the tax breaks be used for incremental or otherwise expanded construction efforts; they could all go just to fatten the pockets of investors in previously planned projects.
Moreover, as others have noted, desperately needed infrastructure projects that are not attractive to private investors municipal water-system overhauls, repairs of existing roads, replacement of bridges that do not charge tolls get no help from Trumps plan. And contractors? Well, they get a 10 percent pretax profit margin, according to the plan. Combined with Trumps sweeping business tax break, this would represent a stunning $85 billion after-tax profit for contractors underwritten by the taxpayers.
Second, as a result of the above, Trumps plan isnt really a jobs plan, either. Because the plan subsidizes investors, not projects; because it funds tax breaks, not bridges; because theres no requirement that the projects be otherwise unfunded, there is simply no guarantee that the plan will produce any net new hiring. Investors may simply shift capital from unsubsidized projects to subsidized ones and pocket the tax breaks on projects they would have funded anyway. Contractors have no obligation to hire new workers, or expand workers hours, to collect their $85 billion. To their credit, the plans authors dont call it a jobs plan; ironically, it is Democrats looking to align with Trump who have given it that name. They should not fool themselves.
Third, because there is no proposed funding mechanism for Trumps tax breaks, they will add to the deficit perhaps as much as $137 billion. ...........................
Fourth, if the Republican approach to the Recovery Act is any indication, the Trump plan will come chock-full of policy changes that undermine core Democratic principles. Buried inside the plan will be provisions to weaken prevailing wage protections on construction projects, undermining unions and ultimately eroding workers earnings. Environmental rules are almost certain to be gutted in the name of accelerating projects.
I understand why Democrats are searching for areas where they can make progress under a ..............................
After the disappointing election results, Democrats are looking for ways to connect with working-class voters and Trumps plan appears to offer that. But when the plan is passed and those voters see that it fattens investors and contractors pockets (but not workers), creates few jobs, depresses wages and damages our environment, they will sour on it and turn against its backers. Democrats may lack the votes to stop Trumps plan, particularly if the GOP uses extraordinary legislative vehicles or processes to pass it. But Democrats should not add their votes and credibility to this poorly designed initiative.
Read more on this topic:
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)Many ought to be wary of this and know what this is.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)tableturner
(1,680 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)David Frum is conservative and said on The New Yorker Radio Hour that the administration gets to be conservative, but that security matters and the Constitution need protection from this megalomaniac. I think he doesn't grasp what fascism can accomplish. This type of ripoff scheme goes on here all the time. And it has disquieted some progressives.