Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JEFF9K

(1,935 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:01 PM Dec 2012

Should Baseball Fans Join the Fiscal Cliff Discussion?

Should baseball fans get in on the discussion? If the top marginal rate was raised to 91%, like in the prosperous 1950s, the top players would stop demanding contracts that are affordable only by the Yankees and a couple of other teams. This would mean that most baseball fans wouldn't have to see their favorite players leave when they become free agents. This could result in baseball again becoming our National Pastime!

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Baseball Fans Join the Fiscal Cliff Discussion? (Original Post) JEFF9K Dec 2012 OP
Sure.....why not? GP6971 Dec 2012 #1
Home run locks Dec 2012 #2
Well, that's ingenious. malthaussen Dec 2012 #3
maybe not JEFF9K Dec 2012 #4
Whatever could be negotiated is left. malthaussen Dec 2012 #6
over 3 JEFF9K Dec 2012 #10
Yay! Then The Rich Owner of Baseball Team Would Get Even Richer! Yavin4 Dec 2012 #5
monopoly JEFF9K Dec 2012 #8
owners JEFF9K Dec 2012 #12
Don't forget the teams that play in states with no state income tax. Filibuster Harry Dec 2012 #7
state tax JEFF9K Dec 2012 #9
Players Pay Taxes in States Where They Have Road Games Yavin4 Dec 2012 #11

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
3. Well, that's ingenious.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:55 AM
Dec 2012

Of course, the reverse would happen, as the players would want the biggest contracts possible to get as much as they could after taxes, and anyway all players except those at the minimum MLB rate are taxed in the highest bracket to begin with.

Presumably your tongue was in your cheek, but I'm feeling like a spoilsport right now.

-- Mal

JEFF9K

(1,935 posts)
4. maybe not
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 11:12 AM
Dec 2012

All income over three million would be taxed at 91%, and the agent would get 10%. What's left?

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
6. Whatever could be negotiated is left.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:23 PM
Dec 2012

The average ballplayer makes 3.2 mil, already taxed @ 91%(If that was the top rate). The agent's fee (which is more like 15% or more these days, I believe) is tax-deductible. Of course, good ballplayers, as opposed to average ones, are pulling in 15-20 mil already. The higher rates are paid by the Yankees (or the Dodgers -- have you seen their projected payroll for next year?) Anyway, when you're making more money than most people can score in three lifetimes, any further income is a matter of keeping score, not need. The best players will still insist on huge contracts because they want "respect."

-- Mal

Yavin4

(35,442 posts)
5. Yay! Then The Rich Owner of Baseball Team Would Get Even Richer!
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:31 PM
Dec 2012

Why pay labor their market value worth? Labor should be forced to accept arbitrary limits on their earnings. Meanwhile, owners will pocket the increased revenue that the sport generates.



Jeebus, get a clue.

Yavin4

(35,442 posts)
11. Players Pay Taxes in States Where They Have Road Games
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:32 AM
Dec 2012

So, when a team plays in NY or Boston, they pay state taxes on the income that they make there for that visit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Should Baseball Fans Join...