Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:09 PM Dec 2016

Has anyone else noticed a big uptick in MANSPLAINING lately?

Like they stole the election (YEP! I said it). Our sworn enemy committed an act of war against the USA and 27%of our electorate seems to think that's okay, because *they* weren't attacked. One was an act of war. Aiding it is an act of treason.

The mansplaining about almost every other thing rewards the efforts of the KGOP.

Anyway, this is just a silent little thread because of the uptick in mansplaining going on here, and all over the place.

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has anyone else noticed a big uptick in MANSPLAINING lately? (Original Post) LaydeeBug Dec 2016 OP
Mansplaining? Maybe, but I think it's more stupidity and bullshit.... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #1
I'm for real. I get this "you don't know what treason is" blah, blah, blah LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #2
Missed those threads (largely deliberately) but I see some Bernistas not being able... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #3
Your last sentence is the spot on truth... LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #11
OK, what's mansplaining?? Kilgore Dec 2016 #4
it is when a man patronises or condescends to a woman when trying to argue a point Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #6
I thought that was called "being very rude" Kilgore Dec 2016 #62
Oh it is, but everything must be framed in a racism or sexism context now Amishman Dec 2016 #64
Unfortunately so Kilgore Dec 2016 #65
Yes, but... TlalocW Dec 2016 #5
lol. JHan Dec 2016 #7
Russia is our sworn enemy? oberliner Dec 2016 #8
Having been to Russia rumdude Dec 2016 #12
Oh, that setteles it then. You went there before and they were cordial LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #18
Who, exactly, swore them as our enemy? pintobean Dec 2016 #22
Oh...*another* "that settles it". The USA has no enemies. Ok. Gotcha. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #25
Answer the question. pintobean Dec 2016 #26
Do I need to "submit" to you...in the way that YOU demand? LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #27
Again, you made the claim. pintobean Dec 2016 #28
No, I answered your question....you just decided you didn't like my answer. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #31
"Sworn", in the sense "publicly affirmed or confirmed." Igel Dec 2016 #41
Are you mansplaining pintobean Dec 2016 #43
Thank you for setting someone straight LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #45
Meddling in our elections. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #52
There, there, little lady. Let me tell you how you're wrong & how Bernie could have saved us all. baldguy Dec 2016 #9
I know, right? lol nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #10
And that, for those wondering, is mansplaining mcar Dec 2016 #21
Where does a mansplainer get his water? sweetloukillbot Dec 2016 #29
Perfect! mcar Dec 2016 #56
"Well, actually"--Isn't that the name of a movie starring Hugh Grant? nt tblue37 Dec 2016 #58
Great melman Dec 2016 #50
Perfect reply. baldguy Dec 2016 #60
Heres some realitysplaining: Russia is NOT (and never was) our sworn enemy. jack_krass Dec 2016 #13
LOL! Did you forget the Cold War? Why it looks like reality eludes you LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #16
"Did you forget the Cold War?" jack_krass Dec 2016 #19
awesome. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #20
Heres some more realitysplain: Russia is NOT the USSR jack_krass Dec 2016 #44
YAWN LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #46
The USSR ended 25 years ago pintobean Dec 2016 #49
Afghanistan was the true graveyard of that empire. elehhhhna Dec 2016 #53
We didn't actually win anything radical noodle Dec 2016 #55
Christ on a trailer hitch Hekate Dec 2016 #38
Putin would rather disagree. Igel Dec 2016 #42
Happy to be on disagreeing sides with Putin. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #48
If that was an act of war, then we would have attacked almost every country in the world. jfern Dec 2016 #14
You are conflating *AND* setting up a straw man LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #17
Come on, the US government hacks almost everyone. jfern Dec 2016 #39
We would never spy on our "sworn enemies" pintobean Dec 2016 #40
which has nothing to do with them hacking our election. Pretending that rewards them. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #47
Things just keep getting sillier. pintobean Dec 2016 #15
"This Microaggression Will Not Stand, Man" Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #30
More mansplainin', man. pintobean Dec 2016 #32
Well what else am I supposed to do with this big ol' mansplainer I got here Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #34
OMF WTF is that thing? Looks like the giant robotic land-squid from my nightmares lol jack_krass Dec 2016 #36
It's a good looking woman. pintobean Dec 2016 #37
Just because people are telling you you're wrong, doesn't make it mansplaining mythology Dec 2016 #23
There's also the possibility that they're mansplaining LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #24
LOL! EL34x4 Dec 2016 #63
I've gotten it in here MFM008 Dec 2016 #33
They don't think it's *them*. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #35
i know MFM008 Dec 2016 #57
argh! logic trap! can't prove you wrong without proving you right! unblock Dec 2016 #51
I'm stunned by the brushing aside of the very real threat Russia represents Tatiana Dec 2016 #54
me too. I am stunned by their arrogance, hubris, whatever. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #61
The last sentence....girrrrrrrrrrrrl...that last sentence NAILS it. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #66
They showed up in this thread, right on time. I feel like now is a good time to mention kcr Dec 2016 #59

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Mansplaining? Maybe, but I think it's more stupidity and bullshit....
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:17 PM
Dec 2016

Which is what most mansplaining consists of, come to think of it.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
2. I'm for real. I get this "you don't know what treason is" blah, blah, blah
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:21 PM
Dec 2016

do even more research, and it turns out THEY don't fucking know.

But it isn't really about that. This is a Bernie faction coming back for more primary bashing.

They. just. keep. doing. it.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. Missed those threads (largely deliberately) but I see some Bernistas not being able...
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:31 PM
Dec 2016

to let go. It's been happening locally, too, with a few people I know running around aimlessly shouting "if only..."

We just lost a serious Congressional election along with the orange shitgibbon's ascension, and there's real work to be done, not reworking the past.

And, yes, I see treason abounding, along with what were once considered acts of war. Unfortunately, there are powers out there just not listening or caring.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
11. Your last sentence is the spot on truth...
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 10:19 PM
Dec 2016

but we have to remind them of it every fucking day.

If Bill Clinton's keeping Yassir Arafat on hold is a constitutional crisis, the idea that this "once was" considered acts of war, or that this "once was" considered treason, says something about the perpetrators. Not about the victims.

Amishman

(5,559 posts)
64. Oh it is, but everything must be framed in a racism or sexism context now
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 11:22 AM
Dec 2016

Calling it 'being an arrogant jackass' does not draw upon the well of identity politics so we need new terms.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
8. Russia is our sworn enemy?
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:49 PM
Dec 2016

There's definitely some tension but "sworn enemy" seems a little extreme.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
18. Oh, that setteles it then. You went there before and they were cordial
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 09:50 AM
Dec 2016


Here's a fucking hint for you: Allies don't meddle in elections.

Take care.
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
28. Again, you made the claim.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:08 PM
Dec 2016

It's BS and you've been called on it. You've decided to dodge.

But, playing victim right off the bat is pretty much an admission of a weak argument.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
31. No, I answered your question....you just decided you didn't like my answer.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:37 PM
Dec 2016

but thank you for mansplaining a weak argument.

I am sure you think you are the arbiter of such things.

Igel

(35,362 posts)
41. "Sworn", in the sense "publicly affirmed or confirmed."
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 09:50 PM
Dec 2016

Often with a tinge of hyperbole.

Rather different from "sworn-in enemies," which is what often happens in court of law. I don't think there's a chief magistrate able to swear in Russia as an enemy in the court of war, were such a thing to exist.

Usually "sworn enemies" has reciprocity in the definition, but it strikes me that results from the plural noun referring to two parties. I could imagine somebody felicitiously saying "Bertie and Jeeves are my sworn enemies, but honestly, I fail to see what I did to incur such animosity".

Saying "Roger and Bertie are sworn enemies" in isolation rather presupposes reciprocity in any decent parsing of the verb's semantics.


I'll put this down as flouting Grice. I'll leave aside intentionality. (http://www-01.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsTheCooperativePrinciple.htm)

sheshe2

(83,950 posts)
52. Meddling in our elections.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 12:14 AM
Dec 2016

Best buds with trump and many of his cabinet. T's daughter takes vaca's with Putties girl friend. Yes, I would say they are sworn enemies at least with Dems. Repukes love Russia now. They sure hold the same values.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
16. LOL! Did you forget the Cold War? Why it looks like reality eludes you
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 09:48 AM
Dec 2016

But suuuuuuuuuuuure. Russia isn't our enemy. Neither is Iraq.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
44. Heres some more realitysplain: Russia is NOT the USSR
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 11:27 PM
Dec 2016

An argument *could* be made that the USSR (whos stated goal was violent worldwide communist revolution ) was a sworn enemy of ours. However, Russia is not the USSR.

radical noodle

(8,013 posts)
55. We didn't actually win anything
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 12:58 AM
Dec 2016

And while the communist USSR no longer exists, they have a dictator leader, Putin, who is former KGB, messes in our elections and would love nothing more than to see us lose our freedoms and standing in the world.

Igel

(35,362 posts)
42. Putin would rather disagree.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 09:54 PM
Dec 2016

Malyavin and Dugin would have a few things to say about it, as well.

Unless by "Russia" you mean the population, in which you have part of a point. But looking over the pop-lit that is avidly read by many males, esp. those under 30, you'd realize that that part of a point isn't all that impressively large.

Then again, they'd just call you an amerikos (which the urban dictionary defines as "dumb American", but leaves out a bit of the nuance and put-down; it's sort of like "ameri-fag&quot .

jfern

(5,204 posts)
14. If that was an act of war, then we would have attacked almost every country in the world.
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 03:36 AM
Dec 2016

Crazy talk about Russia will give us 2 term President Trump.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
34. Well what else am I supposed to do with this big ol' mansplainer I got here
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:45 PM
Dec 2016


I mean look at this thing. I suppose I could hang ornaments on it.
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
23. Just because people are telling you you're wrong, doesn't make it mansplaining
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 04:23 PM
Dec 2016

There's always the possibility that you're actually just wrong.

MFM008

(19,823 posts)
33. I've gotten it in here
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 06:42 PM
Dec 2016

Including a lecture in the Constitution I received because I was born in a tree on the African plains and raised by apes....

unblock

(52,379 posts)
51. argh! logic trap! can't prove you wrong without proving you right!
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 12:05 AM
Dec 2016

hmm, well, i suppose technically, i could transition and *then* prove you wrong; but, i'm just not that committed to making a point

well played, laydeebug.

well played indeed.



Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
54. I'm stunned by the brushing aside of the very real threat Russia represents
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 12:32 AM
Dec 2016

Last edited Tue Dec 27, 2016, 09:13 PM - Edit history (1)

not only to the US, but to the world.

Putin has global aspirations. He wants to reunite/recreate the Soviet Union. He has ruled Russia, in some capacity, for almost two decades. He is fomenting insurrection within the European Union and now has inserted himself into the Middle Eastern sphere.

His goal is Soviet Domination. He wants to destroy the Western world and has the patience, talent, and intelligence to do so.

Yes, Russia is our enemy because they wanted to destroy us during the Cold War then and they want to destroy us now. They have the convenient tool of Donald Trump to use as the Trojan Horse that will defeat us from within.

The fact that we just so casually accept that Russia is not our enemy and Putin is not out to destroy us is proof that Putin is succeeding in his goals.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
61. me too. I am stunned by their arrogance, hubris, whatever.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 08:48 PM
Dec 2016

They seem oblivious to it...and your last sentence is spot on!

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
66. The last sentence....girrrrrrrrrrrrl...that last sentence NAILS it.
Thu Dec 29, 2016, 09:22 AM
Dec 2016

My Daddy fought in a war to keep Russian influence out of a small country. Doused in Agent Orange repeatedly, it eventually cost him his life.

I take particular *umbrage* with traitors welcoming them now like it's hunky dory.

kcr

(15,320 posts)
59. They showed up in this thread, right on time. I feel like now is a good time to mention
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 02:59 AM
Dec 2016

that they likely had a hand in their candidate losing the primary. Bernie clearly associates that kind of crap with the working class and he was trying to win that vote. It's become more obvious since the election. He was trying to out-Trump Trump. Now we all lose.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has anyone else noticed a...