Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 09:30 AM Mar 2013

Under Prop 8, My Straight Marriage Would Not Be Legal

http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/under-prop-8-my-straight-marriage-would-not-be-legal/

Here's a couple of snips: "Yesterday, at the Supreme Court, the backers of California’s Proposition 8 (which outlaws marriage between people of the same gender) came up with this legal rationale to justify their support of the law: they claim that the only reason to get married is to make babies and raise them. The Supremes (literally) mocked this notion and the audience laughed at Charles Cooper, the poor schlub who had to try to sell the Court on this idea."

"Mr. and Mrs. Blunt and Cranky are not on their first marriage: indeed, their children were pretty much grown and had flown the nest by the time they crankily tied the knot. And they cannot have more children (although to be honest, at this time of life, grandbabies are a lot more fun anyway). So, since procreation is the purpose of marriage, this would seem to mean that this marriage between two straight Americans should be illegal according to the Prop 8 Backers."

Lots more at the link.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Under Prop 8, My Straight Marriage Would Not Be Legal (Original Post) riqster Mar 2013 OP
You do not have to be married to procreate. But on that rationale, does that patricia92243 Mar 2013 #1
Eventually, Logan's Run could become reality riqster Mar 2013 #4
What about those that stop having children on purpose after one, two, or three children? LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #6
Illegal contraception? riqster Mar 2013 #9
Fertility tests for marriage? HockeyMom Mar 2013 #2
Crazy or cornered riqster Mar 2013 #5
Like this blogpost! eom mainer Mar 2013 #3
I'm wondering if we still live in America? LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #7
Not entirely, not anymore riqster Mar 2013 #8

patricia92243

(12,607 posts)
1. You do not have to be married to procreate. But on that rationale, does that
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 09:53 AM
Mar 2013

mean that people who been married for years get too old to have children are automatically divorced.

Inquiring minds want to know (sarcasm)

riqster

(13,986 posts)
4. Eventually, Logan's Run could become reality
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 10:43 AM
Mar 2013

No, not really. But taking it to the extreme, that's where the crazy-assed Prop Hate thinking could lead.

LiberalFighter

(51,263 posts)
6. What about those that stop having children on purpose after one, two, or three children?
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 12:39 PM
Mar 2013

Or if the guy (probably not too many) get snipped? If the are snipped before the marriage is it invalid? How about after the marriage so they can avoid having more?

Wouldn't that also make contraceptives and the pill illegal? Really? Do they want to go there?

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
2. Fertility tests for marriage?
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 10:05 AM
Mar 2013

Married? No CONTRACEPTIVES for you. You MUST make babies. This reminds me of a certain country back in the 40s. I won't use their slogan. It's too despicable.

Are these people really this crazy?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
5. Crazy or cornered
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 10:55 AM
Mar 2013

Either way, this law and all others like it need to be tossed into the dumpster.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Under Prop 8, My Straight...