Regarding Harry Reid:

[tblue]

What should we do?

17 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	Get a new Senate Majority Leader today!
	0 (0%)
	Get a new Senate Majority Leader yesterday!
	10 (59%)
	Get a new Senate Majority Leader after the 2014 election!
	1 (6%)
	Keep this Senate Majority Leader and move to Canada!
	0 (0%)
	Keep this Senate Majority Leader and scream whenever you hear his name!
	0 (0%)
	Keep this Senate Majority Leader. He's fine. I like him.
	5 (29%)
	Give up on politics.
	1 (6%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Tx4obama]

1. Harry Reid is okay. He just needs to talk louder, and sound angry more often. n/t

[Warpy]

2. He needs to have somebody's foot stuffed up his ass

until he stops trying to scare the GOP with threats and actually does something about the problem.

Harry, it's been 4 1/2 years. It's time, damn it.

[busterbrown]

3. He’s a Mormon so he doesn’t drink..

Thats a problem!!!

[Warpy]

4. I don't drink

and it's not a problem.

[defacto7]

5. He's a Mormon so that's the problem.

I think I'll drink now.

[busterbrown]

8. This will be easy listening music for ya.. Enjoy !!!!

[defacto7]

9. Oh man....

That just hit the spot. whoa... memories... 1968... that was one of those surreal dream/memory years for me. I'm mellow.

[busterbrown]

10. Yea, The Jeff Beck group with Rod as lead singer.. Ron wood Bass, Mick Waller drums and Nicki Hopkin

s Keys...Saw them 5 times at Fillmore East,, Rod was great back then. Some set of pipes..
Check the Truth Album out... One of the best.. Stay Mellow, my man..

[delrem]

11. Yah, maybe he took some acting lessons it'd help his presentation.

Esp. amongst those who only care about fancy rhetoric and histrionic acting. Why, if only Harry Reid talked louder and acted angry everything would be fine.
One thing is true, he was blessed from on high when the R's chose Sharon Angle to oppose him, allowing him to slip by once again.

[awoke_in_2003]

15. Angry Reid...

Is as effective as a John Conyers strongly worded letter.

[davidpdx]

12. Get another Majority Leader now

But we are going to have to wait until after 2014 to see if we can replace him.

[bamacrat]

13. I always feel bad replacing someone who has served us for so long but...

Harry is the poster child for the lefts lack of testicular fortitude. We have the best ideas, the most charismatic people but we have not spine, balls, guts or whatever word you want to use to imply those who submit and give in easily. We need people like Elizabeth Warren and Alan Grayson to be in control, a new liberal with the thick skin and hutzpah to get shit done.

[onenote]

14. "we" don't pick the majority leader. the members of the caucus do

And I've seen nothing to suggest the caucus has any plans to dump Harry.

[tblue]

17. They're not answerable to us, I guess.

Well we need to tell them anyway, and hold them accountable.

[Harmony Blue]

16. A new direction

Reid doesn't have the ability rally consistently.

[dusty trails]

18. Reid

Reid needs to stop letting the minority GOP insist on 60 votes to pass everything. He's in effect turned control over to the Republicans and helped them block every bill that's good for America. The man has no backbone. This Congress and country is quickly going downhill, thanks to the GOP and wimpy "democrats" like Harry Reid.

[bigwillq]

19. I've long thought that Reid should be replaced (nt)

[JustAnotherGen]

20. I like Harry Reid

But we need fresh blood. Someone who is not afraid to lose an election.

[Doctor_J]

21. I voted #2, but Harry's just part of a broken system

we have an appeaser in the WH, an appeaser as Senate Majority Leader. Our party "leaders" are weak, corporate centrists while the repuke leaders are insane far-right partisan zealots. The results of their staged "battles" are very predictable.

[Wabbajack_]

22. I hope that SOB McConnell

isn't the new majority leader after the election.

[MADem]

23. It's not up to us. The leadership of the House and Senate is voted in by their peers.

The only thing that matters about Harry Reid is that the Democratic SENATORS like the way he runs things, and they return him to his post because THEY believe he is the most effective representative for them.

What I think, or anyone else thinks, matters not.

It's an organizational leadership position. He speaks for the Democrats in the Senate, and he organizes the Dem's strategy based on inputs from others in the leadership and from the membership as well.

I don't know why people don't understand this.