= new reply since forum marked as read
What he did was show up twice for the people who voted for him twice when his presence was sorely needed. NJ does not see candidates during Presidential elections, as we are not a battleground state. We don't see them the way a place like Florida does.
In attendance when he toured the damage the first time . . . Menendez and the late Lautenberg. Our Senators at the time - and Menendez not only ran against the opposition, but against Christie. He would be a better boost than Obama right now.
And when she closes it to 10% - we need him, Booker, and anyone else who can lend us a hand to get out here. It's not about Buono - it's about Democrats in NJ who really know this piece of crap that calls himself Governor.
But here's the thing - she already closed his lead by 10%. It's only 20% to go. And she acknowledges that we - the volunteers - are doing this. We are helping her to help ourselves.
There's a small part of me here that wants to win so we can thumb our noses. Just so we can. And not just at Republicans. 
When people hire Bill Clinton to speak, it's not only because he used to be president. How often do prestige events seek to hire George W. Bush to speak? And what is he worth as a speaker anyway? $4.95?
Clinton happens to be a brilliant and charismatic speaker. I've seen him mesmerize a crowd both on TV and in a closed room from four feet away. His appeal is for real. His passion for charitable work is, too. Oh, he likes the money, don't get me wrong ("I've been poor and I've been rich and I like rich better" , but he knows that this point, he has enough of it, and puts plenty of what he takes in these days into the Foundation and the CGI.
If Buono's numbers improve, by the way, I think Obama will get involved, but Virginia must take priority at this point. Maybe Cory Booker can help in the way of joint appearances in the meantime. What we can't overcome is the fact that Christie did go to bat for his state after Sandy in a big way, and didn't hesitate to work with Obama on relief when it was needed. He had nothing to lose (except maybe Ann Coulter, and she's no loss) and everything to gain, and he made clever use of that while he could. He put a lot of political capital in the bank that Buono has no chance to match before the election. It will be a sly campaign manager indeed that can present Buono in such a light that NJ voters look beyond that.
And then he misappropriated it for his own personal gain.
I hope your son in law realizes that Christie is no friend to the Union man and woman.
And it's not just social issues. We are near the bottom of the barrel for job growth and near the top for unemployment. And our education system sucks - and it's not the fault of the teacher's union. Look what that asshole just appointed in Camden NJ to "run" the schools.
He's a piece of shit - we all know it - we cannot give him one iota of credit. He's not a string leader. He just uses his obesity as a front to be a bully. A very nasty and spiteful man that one is.
You are quoting from The Blaze, a RW site????????????
As for the NYT's article, Media Matters pointed out various flaws in the Times' article.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/08/16/president-clinton-refutes-ny-times-errors-in-fo/195451
Or his $500,000 fee for a 45 minute speech? And don't ignore my main point, which is that the Democratic party OWES support to people who agree to run in races they have no expectation of winning; and people like ex-presidents, who made their post-presidential fortunes from their status as ex-presidents, OWE something back to the party which enabled them to gain office. If Clinton had not been elected President, where would he be today? An ex-governor of Arkansas would not command 1/2 million for a speech. He'd be keynoting Chamber of Commerce state conventions scouting for legal clients for his Little Rock law firm. And if his wife were not considered a likely candidate for president, I doubt people would be nearly as generous in their gifts to his foundation. I believe the New York Times article discussed how potential donors to the Foundation were strong-armed into donating to his wife's campaign fund.
Greed, gluttony and lust are referred to as sins of excess. Clinton seems to have gotten his gluttony and lust under control, but his greed is running rampant. Greed is an inordinate desire to acquire or possess more than one needs, especially with respect to material wealth. Whether it is the obsession of an individual to accumulate boundless wealth, or a politician selling out to special interest lobbyists, or of a corporation maximizing profits by exploiting workers, and/or promoting/marketing weapons of war and violence, it is the premier vice/sin driving our civilization into the mud.
And here's another evaluation of Clinton's "fund-raising" for you:
Jonathan Tobin, Senior Online Editor of the conservative Jewish publication Commentary Magazine, criticized the former president for “shaking down” the charitable group which “raises questions not only of good taste but also of the propriety of one charitable endeavor profiting at the expense of the other.” In an article titled, Bill Clinton's Big Israeli Payday, Tobin writes:
We are constantly reminded of the fact that there’s no better gig in the world than being an ex-president. With lucrative book contracts (for books that don’t always get read but for which publishers feel obligated to shell out big bucks in advances), highly paid speaking engagements and uncounted perks as well as lifetime security, our former commanders-in-chief live the rest of their lives high on the proverbial hog. And when they’re done repairing their personal finances, they can start foundations and shake down everyone who wants their ear or to link their names with a former president. That’s pretty much the story of the last 12 years of Bill Clinton’s life, as he has become a wealthy man as well as one with a personal foundation to which he can funnel almost unlimited amounts of contributions from those who wish to earn his good will or that of his wife, who has her own eye on the White House in 2016.
But there is a point when even the usual post-presidential gravy train becomes excess and it appears that Clinton has reached just such a moment. By accepting a $500,000 honorarium from the Shimon Peres Academic Center, Clinton has exposed himself and his hosts (which include the Jewish National Fund, which is co-sponsoring the event as part of its president’s summit in Israel this summer) to scorn and criticism. Clinton apparently demanded that the Center and the JNF pony up a cool half million and deliver it to his foundation a year in advance to secure his appearance at an event honoring the Israeli president’s 90th birthday. This raises questions not only of good taste but also of the propriety of one charitable endeavor profiting at the expense of the other.
The Center and the JNF attempted to recoup some of the money by charging those who attended the gala to take place on June 17 in Reshoot, Israel approximately $800 a head. But Peres was scandalized by the idea of asking so much from those coming to his birthday party and the Times of Israel reports he said he wouldn’t attend if it was nothing but a fundraiser.
I agree with Tobin that there is something unseemly (a mild term - I would use "offensive"
about Clinton, who was scheduled to receive the Israeli President’s Award from Peres at an event scheduled for two days later, shaking down the JNF and its donor base for this kind of money for his personal charity. As New York Magazine noted, that amounts to $11,111.00 per minute. Or as one commenter to the Times of Israel article linked below noted, " $185 per second: even when he coughs, pauses and yawns."
Tobin concluded:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/06/04/bill-clintons-big-israeli-payday-shimon-peres-jewish-national-fund/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/jnf-to-pay-bill-clinton-500000-for-45-minute-talk/
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/06/bill-clinton-speech-peres-500000-dollars.html
Bill has campaigned for many candidates and will continue to do so.
As for his getting paid for giving speeches, why do you give a fig if someone wants to pay him $500K for a speech? Lucky him.
Hillary couldn't payback these people for their support because she was the SOS, so Bill helped out. Same as any other politician would have done.
I hope that it doesn't come back to bite us in the butt if Christie becomes the Republican nominee in 2016.
The behavior of various local Democratic politicians has been disgraceful. They more or less endorsed Christie by not endorsing or campaigning for Buono. Unfortunately, I think that he will win the election and become a top contender for 2016. If he becomes the Republican nominee, we may really have a fight on our hands. A pox on all these Democratic politicians in NJ who are sitting on their hands and not helping Buono.
The only plus I see is that the conservative base despises Christie and calls him a RINO. So maybe we'll be lucky and he won't win the nomination.
I couldn't remember the 'numbers' at the end of your user name.
to vote for Chris Christie! None at all!! 