2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama is brilliant!
President Obama is the only one in the world who has staunchly stood his ground for a military strike against Assad, and who has the power to do that even without the consent of Congress.
Keeping that card on the table made Russia blink and offer Assad a way out of avoiding a bloodbath and look like a Romanian dictator by accepting Putin's offer to put his chemicals and gas weapons under International control.
We still have to wait and see, but it's looking like the stick and carrot is working!
"MOSCOW In a surprise move, Russia promised Monday to push its ally Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them quickly to avert U.S. strikes."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/russia-syria-chemical-weapons-international-control_n_3893951.html
Good on Obama!
Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)My guess is that the Russians know that the UN tests are going to come back with their signature on the Sarin gas..
Keep us posted..
Buddaman
(503 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I hope you're right.
It would be consistent with his clever and effective strategies in the past.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)If he can end this crisis diplomatically, he'll make everyone look like fools. He can't be serious about creating a carbon copy of what Bush did, and what can lethal bombs do for Syria's civilians that lethal gas can't?
Fingers, toes, and eyes crossed...
rocktivity
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)That's what he's going to say in tomorrow's address - right?
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)However, imo, this is not an example of his brilliance so much as his consistency (which does reflect deep intelligence).
Consistency - people on DU should consider adding some of that, and having appreciation for that, to their own emotional and intellectual toolkits.
Baitball Blogger
(46,705 posts)I've always said that Obama is not a president I would want to play Poker with.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)REUTERS/Susan Walsh/Pool
LONDON | Mon Sep 9, 2013 7:22am EDT
(Reuters) - Secretary of State John Kerry was making a rhetorical comment when he said on Monday that Syria's President Bashar al-Assad would not hand over his country's chemical weapons.
Kerry told a news briefing on Monday that Assad could avoid a military strike by turning over all his chemical weapons within a week but added that Assad was not about to do that.
"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used," a U.S. State Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/09/us-syria-crisis-weapons-idUSBRE9880GE20130909
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)In response to which the only viable move on Assad's part is to turn them over, and not drag his feet.
They aren't "walking back an offer". They are pretty much putting neon lights around the way out.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)"always having force on the table" as a means to pressing negotiation.
It seems to me that Obama and Putin must have had some interesting words on this subject at the G-20.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)only to find out later that he was bluffing to get his way.
It sounds so unlike him to be like bush.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)Pleeeeze. Or are you saying he never pulled a fast one in the past. Because if it is the second you have not been paying attention.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)cause you seem to be trying very hard to put words into my mouth.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)That would mean that he brilliantly negotiated Obamacare and got us truly fantastic health care plan that solves this countries health coverage problems and... brilliantly negotiated extending the Bush tax cuts... brilliantly "held strong" by putting SS on the table and in jeopardy for all time to come until Dems get a spine again and start standing up for the American people and we all can see that isn't going to happen anytime soon...
So if he is a brilliant negotiator as you claim that means he wanted to screw us in favor of banksters and rich people. Good to know.
Seriously, the brilliant eleventy brazillionth dimensional chess master meme is so fucking old.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)He ain't perfect, but he ain't the bad person some portray him to be.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I understand the obstructionists. I wish the ardent Obama supporters understood that he is not a multi-dimensional chess master.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I think the system long ago grew too corrupt and complex for anyone, even an FDR with an FDR congress, to really make the kinds of changes that need to be make.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)are ridiculous.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)does! HA
cui bono
(19,926 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)been here on DU....taking on all comers. I feel the need to gloat...since I took so much bullshit off of people on this site these last few days. Like Obama....I stay the course!
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)in this system.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)Geeze, First I think that is exactly what he did with SS and I think he KNEW that there was no way in Hell that it would ever pass. And if for some pigs fly reason if it did I believe he had a contingency plan.
And do you remember when they were trying to pass Obamacare? If was fighting tooth and nail. They had to pull out all sorts of stops and tricks to get that thing passed. It wouldn't have a chance with a single payer at that time.
And I remember Bill Clinton telling everyone that extending the bush tax cuts were the right thing to do FOR THAT TIME. He only extended them 2 years.
Sometimes I think people here think he is a king or that we don't have a congress or that republicans don't exist.
Try negotiating for something once and see if you get everything that you want. It just doesn't happen.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)He let it go. And did you forget he had secret (which he was forced to admit happened after he tried to deny them) meetings with health insurance during his "negotiations"? I'm not sure he didn't get everything he wanted. He didn't fight for much more than what he got.
As to SS, he put that on the table. A DEM put that on the table! That should NEVER happen. Now it is fair game for anyone to put on the table. Dumb move. Very dumb. Unless you don't care about SS.
I don't much care that Bill Clinton said anything was the right thing to do. He represents big business and he's not the president. And when he was president he signed NAFTA. So no, not worried that Clinton supported it.
No one thinks he is king. I would like to see him actually fight for policies that help the people of this country instead of the banksters and the corporations.
Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)And DU frowns on medical advice/assessments given by posters, just a heads up.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Let's hope something comes of this
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Speaking at a news conference with British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Kerry said that al-Assad could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week.
The U.S. secretary of state described that as an impossible scenario.
He isnt about to do it, Kerry said. And it cant be done, obviously.
The State Department later sought to clarify Kerrys comment as a rhetorical argument, and one U.S. official called it a major goof, adding that Americas top diplomat clearly went off script.
There is no one in the administration who is taking this Syria proposal seriously, the official said.
Read more: http://pix11.com/2013/09/09/hillary-clinton-important-step-if-syria-surrenders-chemical-weapons/#ixzz2eQyXInhH
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)President Barack Obama said on Monday that a military strike against Syria would absolutely be avoided if it follows a Russian proposal to surrender its chemical weapons stockpile.
Obama confirmed to ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer that the U.S. would withdraw plans for an attack if, in fact, it happened. I consider this a modestly positive development, adding that Secretary of State John Kerry would run this plan to ground.
dkf
(37,305 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he could never have pulled it off without a large percentage of what those on the right would perceive as his base screaming bloody murder. Obama thanks you for your support in his effort.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)that the hair-on-fire-brigade starts screaming about the sky falling every ten minutes.
Not to worry. You will be advised to be about something else any minute now. And I'm sure you'll waste no time jumping on THAT bandwagon, the minute it rolls into town.
dkf
(37,305 posts)And if you aren't alarmed, maybe you should be.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)to be 'alarming' in any way.
His actions have always been thoughtful and measured. He didn't earn the name "No Drama Obama" without reason.
The hair-on-fire-brigade will always find something to encourage people to be "alarmed" over - that's what they do.
If you want to ride that bandwagon, that's your prerogative. I prefer to live in the real world, where comments like "Obama WANTS his own WAR!!!" and the like are dismissed as what they are - utter and complete bullshit spewed by people who lack not only political insight, but plain old common sense.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and stay the course!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but politics is a messy sport.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)reusrename
(1,716 posts)He made the exact same deal with Hussein.
flying-skeleton
(696 posts)Without a single bomb and without a single boot on the ground, Obama will have taken Syria's chemical stockpiles out of the equation. If that isn't brilliant, then I don;t know what is. But of course, the GOP will never admit that and if anything, will attempt to take credit for this.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)they are trying oh so hard to spin this in their favor as we speak.
I used the quotation marks...cause I think there are a number here pretending to be Americans...
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Californeeway
(97 posts)so yeah, he is brilliant, by relatively objective standards.
much more brilliant than the vast majority of his detractors who embarrass themselves again and again trying to find the most insulting way to interpret his actions that they can.
It's ideological rigidness to the point of stupidity. He's not a militant Liberal so he must be an evil piece of shit. He doesn't do what I want him to do so he must be an idiot or a sellout.
I see a man of decent moral fiber and tremendous intellectual capacity wrestling with the most difficult and unsolvable problems of our time. He's going to win some, he's going to lose some. He's going to make some different decisions than I would of hoped for. I don't expect him to have the most stereotypical Liberal reaction to every situation. I expect him to be logical and do the logical/moral thing, to sometimes be flawed or make mistakes but to do his best to help people. This realistic set of expectations has allowed me handle the disappointments with a kind of understanding and appreciation of the man and the difficulty of the job that the detractors seem to be desperate to resist. ...Because everyone knows a real Liberal chafes at all authority figures, even the ones fighting their battles for them.
That Obama may make mistakes or handle things differently than how some DU posters would like seems to me inevitable. But I admit taking satisfaction from the knowledge that pretty much every last self-righteous Obama hater on this message board would psychological crumble if they were asked to do his job for a day. All of their half-baked feel-goody ideas about just rigidly shoving Liberal policy down the rest of the countries throat in undemocratic fashion would fail dramatically, and they would realize how ridiculous and counterproductive their arrogant assumptions are.