Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,510 posts)
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:16 PM Oct 2013

States You Shouldn't Be Caught Dead In

From the WSJ, pointing out states that impose Estate and Inheritance taxes which retirees should avoid.



What I would like to see, is another map, showing quality of education and of services provided by the states superimposed on this one.

I think that the results will not surprise most of us.

Here are selected paragraphs:


Robert Negele is a 90-year-old retired executive who has lived in Connecticut for almost 40 years. Despite decades of community involvement, including service on corporate and charity boards, he and two of his children who live nearby are seriously considering leaving the state. A big factor in their deliberations: Connecticut's estate and gift taxes, which tax assets above $2 million per individual at rates as high as 12%. Mr. Negele says some snowbirds at his Stamford retirement home have shifted their tax home to Florida, while others he knows have left the state altogether.

(snip)

Are these taxes effective—that is, do they raise more revenue than they lose when residents like Mr. Negele decide go elsewhere? Economists are divided, and so are the states. In recent years, several states have repealed or suspended their death duties, including Kansas, Oklahoma, Virginia, North Carolina and Indiana. Ohio's repeal, which took effect in January, was urged by Gov. John Kasich to help the Buckeye state "be more competitive with other states." Tennessee's estate tax is scheduled to disappear in 2016.

A few others have moved in the opposite direction. In 2011, Connecticut lowered its exemption to $2 million from $3.5 million. This year, Delaware rescinded the planned sunset of its estate tax, and Washington state raised its top rate on the largest estates for 2014. Minnesota imposed a gift tax beginning July 1 of this year, a move intended to prevent people from avoiding its estate tax by making large gifts while they're alive. (The only other state with a gift tax is Connecticut.)

More..

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304682504579155510034634716


(If you cannot open by clicking on the link, copy and paste the title onto google)

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
States You Shouldn't Be Caught Dead In (Original Post) question everything Oct 2013 OP
"Death Duties" Really? DURHAM D Oct 2013 #1
Yep, nice framing there. As soon as the IRS drags someone back from the dead petronius Oct 2013 #6
I think that that's handled by their super-secret "Supernatural Affairs" Division Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #19
Why MFM008 Oct 2013 #2
I'm crying for the children of those millionaires who have to pay taxes. bravenak Oct 2013 #3
Yes, the guy who wrote this is a typical winger Warpy Oct 2013 #4
I was a major gifts officer for a nonprofit and I was blown away when a young staffer told me he CTyankee Oct 2013 #7
Indeed. Which is why I would have loved to see maps of quality of education question everything Oct 2013 #14
Heh Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #20
So start circulating it Warpy Oct 2013 #21
I just might Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #22
+1. You'd think that the "self-made", "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" right-wingers... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #28
In my state, Minnesota, the inheritance tax kicks in at $1,000,000. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #5
The map says Minnesota does not have an inheritance tax. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #8
You are correct, that was just sloppy nomenclature on my part. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #11
Seriously, if your children are competent to run the family business or family farm... Hippo_Tron Oct 2013 #23
My only problem with inheritance and estate taxes... BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #9
The estate tax is the most fair tax there is MillennialDem Oct 2013 #10
Fuckin PA Aldo Leopold Oct 2013 #12
Yes I believe they tax EVERY penny of inheritance here. DebJ Oct 2013 #24
Not over a certain limit, but any amount at all, but then, this is a Red State in local reps. DebJ Oct 2013 #25
So, states should cut their taxes to keep people with money from leaving? hedgehog Oct 2013 #13
Neither do I question everything Oct 2013 #15
Here is an alternative link: davidpdx Oct 2013 #16
We had to pay plenty when our parents died, and we're not in any of those states. DFW Oct 2013 #17
Inheritance taxes are about more than revenue Recursion Oct 2013 #18
Death taxes are the reason they invented The Rule Against Perpetuities Jersey Devil Oct 2013 #26
There are alternatives TexasBushwhacker Oct 2013 #27

petronius

(26,602 posts)
6. Yep, nice framing there. As soon as the IRS drags someone back from the dead
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 05:01 PM
Oct 2013

over an unpaid 'death tax,' then I'll entertain the notion that that terminology is meaningful. But not until then...

MFM008

(19,818 posts)
2. Why
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:26 PM
Oct 2013

would i read anything on the wall street journal. The states I wouldnt be caught dead in are all red states.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
3. I'm crying for the children of those millionaires who have to pay taxes.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:37 PM
Oct 2013

Can't you see my tears?? How will they survive on less than 2 million dollars? I know, We should cut food stamps to raise the money. Can't you see these rich people are hurting?? While those takers are feeding their kids expensive grapes?? And buying real meat instead of the spam, that the poor folks should be allowed??
I'm really broken up over this.... Those poor millionaire heirs'.
I hope they survive this.
I really do.

Warpy

(111,305 posts)
4. Yes, the guy who wrote this is a typical winger
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:41 PM
Oct 2013

The truth is that dead men pay no tax. Heirs who get a windfall pay taxes on that.

Unfortunately, the right wing has done a bang up job of focusing on the soon to be dead instead of the often undeserving heirs.

Estate taxes do serve a great purpose, making it more difficult to establish an inherited aristocracy of great wealth and for that reason, should be maintained. Estate planning consists of giving heirs just enough to avoid taxation (which is enough to live on for the idle) while giving the rest to charity. While there abuses in the "charity" giving, a lot of the money did get recycled into the economy instead of hoarded by a few heirs.

The rest of us need to educate the propaganda addled on this point.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
7. I was a major gifts officer for a nonprofit and I was blown away when a young staffer told me he
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 05:02 PM
Oct 2013

believed that there was a "death tax" that would tax any of his income or benefits. He was a young guy, just out of the Marines, going to college at night on the GI bill, etc. His income was low, even by most industry standards. He wasn't a republican but he actually believed he was subject to a "death tax." I was shocked.

No wonder we have such a hard time as Dems countering this shit...

question everything

(47,510 posts)
14. Indeed. Which is why I would have loved to see maps of quality of education
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 12:38 AM
Oct 2013

and quality of services superimposed on that map.

After all, these are supported by taxes, including estate and inheritance taxes.

What bugs me is that, no doubt, the families that want to leave clearly benefited from earlier generations who paid taxes but they do not think that now it is appropriate for them to support the future generations.

 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
28. +1. You'd think that the "self-made", "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" right-wingers...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:31 PM
Oct 2013

...would hate the idea of inherited wealth-the kind that makes people rich just because of which family they're a part of.

Of course, they don't hate that idea.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,783 posts)
5. In my state, Minnesota, the inheritance tax kicks in at $1,000,000.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:42 PM
Oct 2013

Very few people have estates worth a million bucks. And even those who do can avoid at least some of the tax with good estate planning.

So, cry me a river, rich people.

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
8. The map says Minnesota does not have an inheritance tax.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 06:21 PM
Oct 2013

It has an estate tax. Also, I see there is an exemption for up to $4 million for farms and small businesses.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,783 posts)
11. You are correct, that was just sloppy nomenclature on my part.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 06:30 PM
Oct 2013

An estate tax is a tax on the assets of an estate before they are distributed to the beneficiaries, which is what MN has.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
23. Seriously, if your children are competent to run the family business or family farm...
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 08:31 PM
Oct 2013

Then transfer partial ownership to them while you're still alive and you avoid the estate tax, end of story. But if they're lazy spoiled brats who are so incompetent that you wouldn't hand over partial ownership while you're still on the planet, then you have no right to bitch about how the estate tax ruined your family business.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
10. The estate tax is the most fair tax there is
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 06:30 PM
Oct 2013

One could argue why tax spending as it is good for the economy.

Or why tax earnings from work, people working is good.

What good has a member of the lucky sperm club done for society or the economy though?

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
25. Not over a certain limit, but any amount at all, but then, this is a Red State in local reps.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:28 AM
Oct 2013
http://www.revenue.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/inheritance_tax/11414

Also of interest is that the tax is due upon the death of the decedent, and becomes delinquent within 9 months of death.
So, my MIL's house wasn't sold until a year after her death; it took awhile to clean things up.
How do you determine the value, particularly in this housing market, of an unsold house?

question everything

(47,510 posts)
15. Neither do I
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 12:40 AM
Oct 2013

Especially since their children benefited from quality education supported by estate tax of previous generations.

As someone recently observed - taxes during the Eisenhower administration were quite high, and no one claimed that he was - gasp - a socialist.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
16. Here is an alternative link:
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 04:29 AM
Oct 2013
http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-365079/

According to the article Oregon's is $1 million. I know my brother and I will get something from our mother, but it will be no where near that. In fact I have student loans and live out of the country, so I may tell my mom to fork everything over to my brother and arrange for him to give me my half. The wife and I are allowed to bring $10,000 in to the country each. I've always joked about lining my underwear with money.

DFW

(54,417 posts)
17. We had to pay plenty when our parents died, and we're not in any of those states.
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 05:44 AM
Oct 2013

They lived in Virginia, but there were plenty of estates taxes to pay. We had to sell their house because we couldn't afford to keep it after paying its assessed value. They built it in 1955 for $50,000, borrowing from every relative that had a cent to spare (they had none), and had to pay the Federal government 50% of the assessed value of some objects inherited from our grandmother.

It was painful to give up the house we had grown up in, but we had all moved on to other parts of the world. Sic transit gloria mundi. No one is starving.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. Inheritance taxes are about more than revenue
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:24 AM
Oct 2013

They're an attempt to try to disrupt capital accumulation across generations.

That is, even if you could show the state lost revenue from an inheritance tax, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
26. Death taxes are the reason they invented The Rule Against Perpetuities
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:49 PM
Oct 2013

"No interest is valid unless it must vest within lives in being plus 21 years from the creation of the interest." Unless, of course, there is an exception for the "Unborn Widow Rule" or the "Fertile Octogenarian Rule."

NJ looks scary on that map but you must know that there is no inheritance or estate tax for any surviving spouse, child or grandchild no matter what the amount. A billionaire would pay no death taxes whatsoever in NJ to his/her spouse or lineal descendants.

However, if there is no spouse or kids the taxes kick in heavy, usually 11-15% for inheritance taxes and another big chunk for estate taxes for estates over $675k.

So move somewhere else if you are giving your money to someone other than your spouse and kids. Otherwise forget it.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,207 posts)
27. There are alternatives
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 05:59 PM
Oct 2013

Most of us would feel quite comfortable with a net worth of $675K. If they are that hung up about their heirs paying taxes on estates above and beyond that amount, then they can 1) buy life insurance for the purpose of paying taxes or 2) give to charity BEFORE they die. They can also give money to whoever they please, subject to gift tax limits. You can't take it with you.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»States You Shouldn't Be C...