Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 05:06 PM Apr 2012

Jon Meacham: Why Obama Owns bin Laden

http://ideas.time.com/2012/04/30/why-obama-owns-bin-laden/?iid=op-main-lede?xid%3Dgonewsedit&google_editors_picks=true#ixzz1tXPuq3IV

The advertisement coincides with a flurry of media projects marking the anniversary of the killing, including a large-scale broadcast by NBC News’ Brian Williams that includes an interview with the President in the Situation Room.

Republicans are — forgive the cliché — shocked, shocked to discover that a presidential contender is “politicizing” an important national event. In this sense, “politicizing” might be best translated as “beating us up and we don’t have anything much to say to stop it.” The ad itself raises intriguing, substantive, legitimate questions — and the ferocious, sputtering Republican reaction is proof positive that they know it, or at least suspect it.

The ad’s theme is that Obama made a courageous and risky decision to send in the SEALs. Here the President has history and facts on his side: it was a courageous and risky call. Had the mission failed, had it been another Desert One, the very people now criticizing the President for trumpeting the achievement would be beginning their second year of excoriating Obama for weakness and fecklessness. And anyone weighing whether to re-elect the President should take the bin Laden operation into account: it is a powerful exhibit that Obama is a steely Commander in Chief — a critical test for many Americans.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jon Meacham: Why Obama Owns bin Laden (Original Post) Drunken Irishman Apr 2012 OP
And every last one of the doubters and dissers should be reminded - calimary Apr 2012 #1
Who knew Repubs amuse bouche Apr 2012 #2
Meacham leans conservative. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #3
Obama is a guy that as President will quaker bill May 2012 #4
Obama took their binky. JoePhilly May 2012 #5

calimary

(89,065 posts)
1. And every last one of the doubters and dissers should be reminded -
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 05:11 PM
Apr 2012

"hey, YOUR guy practically tatttooed it across his face! And take your pick - dubya, or rudy giuliani. Both of 'em draped themselves in that smoldering rubble SHAMELESSLY, used it at every possible opportunity, shoved it in our faces and up our behinds, damn near 24/7. But no, they sure weren't politicizing it, were they?

GoCubsGo

(34,676 posts)
3. Meacham leans conservative.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:52 PM
Apr 2012

So, it's nice to see this coming from him. Glad he's not parroting the latest "anyone would have done that" meme.

quaker bill

(8,262 posts)
4. Obama is a guy that as President will
Tue May 1, 2012, 06:16 AM
May 2012

stand in front of 1000 troops in Baghdad in a gym with cameras rolling, take a basketball and drop a three pointer to start his speech. He has no shortage of self confidence.

He made it very clear that he would go into Pakistan and kill Bin Laden, if he could get a shot at doing so. Everyone else running thought this was a crazy thing to say, most notably of late Rmoney, but he was no exception, basically all of them took issue with this. True to his word, the day he took office he made it many people's full time job to find OBL and get his this shot.

I never had a moment's doubt he would do this.

OBL's head was simply far too big a trophy to pass on.

Obama could not end the wars unless he delivered OBL on a platter. We were never going to leave if OBL was still alive, there was far too much risk of an attack OBL could claim credit for (even if he had nothing to do with it) if he was still alive. No President (R or D) was ever going to pull the troops and leave this landmine on the field by choice.

The notion that Obama would not run on having accomplished this is simply silly. He gets to claim he did it, because he did. It takes their "strong defense" issue off the table, and they don't and actually shouldn't like that very much. They do not have a substitute narritive and they know it. Every time they go back to this well, BHO can fairly state that (they may bluster alot but) "I killed OBL and they didn't". Count on it being featured at the convention.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jon Meacham: Why Obama Ow...