Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:27 AM Nov 2013

Trent Lott, 'Nuclear Option' Coiner, Says Idea Was A Mistake

CATHERINE THOMPSON – NOVEMBER 22, 2013, 7:50 AM EST

Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS), who is considered the man who coined the term "nuclear option," said shortly after the Senate voted Thursday to eliminate the filibuster that the idea was a "mistake."

“It was mistake when we were talking about doing it,” Lott told CNN after the vote. “I still believe the Senate is a unique institution and the rules – no matter how cumbersome and difficult – are better than just making it another House of Representatives.”

Lott conceived of a plan to allow judicial appointments to pass with a simple majority, rather than the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster, during the George W. Bush administration. At that time, Democrats were the minority party blocking the President's nominees from confirmation.

The former Republican leader told CNN that he prefers to call the plan the "constitutional option" now, and warned that invoking it could have unforeseen consequences for Senate Democrats.

full article:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trent-lott-nuclear-option-coiner-says-idea-was-a-mistake

-------------------------

GOP Concern trolls are abounding today!

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trent Lott, 'Nuclear Option' Coiner, Says Idea Was A Mistake (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2013 OP
Yes they are, FoxNewsSucks Nov 2013 #1
Republicans are beginning to learn Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2013 #2
bull. If you look at the right leaning judges that have been appointed by republicans lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #3
Is that old gas bag still around? tavernier Nov 2013 #4

FoxNewsSucks

(10,431 posts)
1. Yes they are,
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:32 AM
Nov 2013

and it's funny how I've heard no one in media mention the fact that Democrats had already allowed about 195 out of 205 Bush appointments through. Republicons today are blocking everything.

Despite what the "librul media" is saying today, it's NOT the same situation.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
2. Republicans are beginning to learn
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:34 AM
Nov 2013

that when you abuse your toys, they can (and should) be taken away from them. I don't have a problem with the filibuster per se but it has gone from being a minority instrument to slow down the occasional objectionable legislation and/or nominee to a passive veto tool solely used to obstruct government from functioning like it's supposed to. What's especially disturbing is that Republicans actually had no substantive criticisms of the nominees that President Obama put forward and there was no legitimate problem with confirming more nominees but they were still preventing votes to be held.

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
3. bull. If you look at the right leaning judges that have been appointed by republicans
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:37 AM
Nov 2013

throughout the years with Democrats who did not block them, this has absolutely no unforeseen consequence for Democrats. In general Democrats were already allowing republicans appointees to go through, so if the republicans take control of the senate, nothing will change in that regard

What it will do is give a chance for the Democrats a chance to have some influence

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Trent Lott, 'Nuclear Opti...