Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
Wed May 2, 2012, 04:39 PM May 2012

SURPRISE! Ron Paul Destroyed Mitt Romney In Massachusetts This Weekend

Business Insider:

Ron Paul dealt a quiet, but embarrassing, blow to Republican rival Mitt Romney this weekend, scoring an impressive delegate victory on the presumptive nominee's home turf.

The Boston Globe reports today that Paul supporters filled more than half of the delegate slots at this weekend's Massachusetts Republican district caucuses, edging out at least 16 Romney delegates for a spot at the Republican National Convention.

...snip...

Massachusetts wasn't the only state where Paul notched delegate victories this weekend. The campaign announced Sunday that Paul supporters will make up 74 percent of the delegates at the Louisiana GOP convention, putting Paul in prime position to pick up a sizable chunk of the state's national convention delegates. Paul supporters also reportedly made inroads at Alaska's GOP convention, overcoming staunch opposition from the state party Establishment.


Romney's campaign is looking more and more like Hilary's: a focus that assumed everything would be wrapped up by Super Tuesday, and no attention to details like caucus and convention procedures.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SURPRISE! Ron Paul Destroyed Mitt Romney In Massachusetts This Weekend (Original Post) brooklynite May 2012 OP
Go Ron Paul! Politicalboi May 2012 #1
That's good amuse bouche May 2012 #2
they are both worthless reich wing freaks........ NavyDavy May 2012 #3
+1 freshwest May 2012 #4
Very true, but it still makes me smile to see Romney lose his home state in the primary Bjorn Against May 2012 #6
True, but... David in Canada May 2012 #12
Fuck Ron Paul. Ikonoklast May 2012 #29
+1 and Gary Johnson. nt TBF May 2012 #35
But Ron Paul has the longer limousine. Kablooie May 2012 #15
Fuck Ron Paul...and fuck Ron Paul's limousine, too. Ikonoklast May 2012 #30
Thank you. n/t vaberella May 2012 #20
Pick your poison: Far-right neoconservatism or extreme libertarianism. nt boxman15 May 2012 #5
I would've rather seen RP as the nominee. Jamaal510 May 2012 #7
Yeah, at least Paul is authentic. boxman15 May 2012 #11
Fuck Ron Paul. Iggo May 2012 #16
Agreed. boxman15 May 2012 #33
Fuck Ron Paul. Iggo May 2012 #14
Yeah libodem May 2012 #23
Fuck Ron Paul. Ikonoklast May 2012 #28
No surprise at all. Now that Rmoney has the nomination, some Repubs eridani May 2012 #8
What the reporter is omitting is that the Romney campaign grantcart May 2012 #9
It smells like a 3rd party run davidpdx May 2012 #13
They are setting up a run for the nomination for Rand Paul in 4 years. grantcart May 2012 #17
They have a VERY good game, but it is limited Cosmocat May 2012 #21
Not exactly, basically all states have caucuses of a kind. grantcart May 2012 #22
No Cosmocat May 2012 #34
We agree, I should have said "many" instead of all. grantcart May 2012 #36
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #18
Snicker. FSogol May 2012 #26
Why not? brooklynite May 2012 #32
Why are we praising Ron Paul on this site? For real people? n/t vaberella May 2012 #19
The enemy of my enemy libodem May 2012 #24
I know, right? Iggo May 2012 #31
Wow...Imagine if Paul put this much effort into real campaigning instead of Blue_Tires May 2012 #25
Rmoney has 847 delegates, Ron Paul has 80 Hippo_Tron May 2012 #27
GOP has sold their soul for wins Thinkingabout May 2012 #37

David in Canada

(512 posts)
12. True, but...
Thu May 3, 2012, 03:10 AM
May 2012

You're right. However, Paul is an HONEST right-wing nutjob whereas Romney is a lying, conniving, glib and backstabbing faux-moderate right-wing douchebag.

At least with Paul, there would be a real debate on the future of the United States, not the mushy pablum-like stuff that seems harmless but gives you cramps and diarrhea later like Romney is espousing!

Bring on Ron Paul. Let's put the right-wing Austrian economic school to bed once and for all!

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
7. I would've rather seen RP as the nominee.
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:11 PM
May 2012

At least with him, he's correct on a couple of issues and would've stirred up a debate about legalization and the war, possibly pushing Obama to the left. But Romney is simply pathetic...

boxman15

(1,033 posts)
11. Yeah, at least Paul is authentic.
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:59 PM
May 2012

His economic policies are nuts, as are a few of his other positions, but a debate between him and Obama would be good for this country I think.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
8. No surprise at all. Now that Rmoney has the nomination, some Repubs
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:13 PM
May 2012

--will feel free to use their delegation nominations as a protest.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
9. What the reporter is omitting is that the Romney campaign
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:17 PM
May 2012

has set up NO statewide campaigns in the states where he contested in the primary, unlike Obama that used the primary as stepping stone for the General Election.

Ron Paul is going to have a stronger organization in the various states on November 4th 2012 than Romney.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
13. It smells like a 3rd party run
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:34 AM
May 2012

Right to Rmoney's toliet. RP is going to be the party pooper and make Rmoney look even more pathetic.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
17. They are setting up a run for the nomination for Rand Paul in 4 years.
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:02 PM
May 2012

And he could well get the nomination because they will know how to work the rules.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
21. They have a VERY good game, but it is limited
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:52 PM
May 2012

they absolutely know how to work states that have caucuses, and also states that have unique delegate formulas.

This is the experience Paul has running a couple times before.

They absolutely came into this election with a plan allowing them to sneak in and gobble up delegates in these states.

But, there are not enough of them for him to make any real run at the nomination, maybe make some chaos.

Past the primary, the delegate game is over.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
22. Not exactly, basically all states have caucuses of a kind.
Thu May 3, 2012, 02:07 PM
May 2012

Some start with caucuses and others start with primary elections.

Those that start with primary elections still elect people to go to state conventions where some of the delegates are chosen.

In this instance Romney won the primary and left. Ron Paul worked the system and elected the delegates to the state convention as the article indicates;



Massachusetts wasn't the only state where Paul notched delegate victories this weekend. The campaign announced Sunday that Paul supporters will make up 74 percent of the delegates at the Louisiana GOP convention, putting Paul in prime position to pick up a sizable chunk of the state's national convention delegates. Paul supporters also reportedly made inroads at Alaska's GOP convention, overcoming staunch opposition from the state party Establishment.




Primaries don't actually select convention delegates. It is just the first stage to do so. If the campaigns don't follow up then they will not get the delegates that they are entitled to. Ron Paul has learned this system very well and will outmanouver all of the others next time.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
34. No
Fri May 4, 2012, 07:01 AM
May 2012

Every state runs it a little differently.

Paul, based on having gone through it a couple of times, based on having an unusually loyal following, and a mentality within his world view to be a little more rebelious about things, they targeted the states, mostly smaller ones, where they could bushwack their way into the delegates.

My point was the point you made, he knows the system well and is taking advantage of it, but there are not that many states that allow for this kind of insurgency.

Pa, for example, is nothing like this.

The majority of the delegates ARE voted on election day, and they tend to be more mainstream party representatives, state senators, county party chairs ... This is outside of a 10 at large types who are rock solid party types.

They will get in line with whoever won the majority vote for the state.

What Paul is doing is not new.

Most states have worked their primary delegate processes to avoid the kind of thing he is doing.

Romney, I think half was not on the ball with it/half knows that even with Paul bushwacking him here and there, and all the clown car candidates, he knew his delegate math going in, like BO did four years ago, and is willing to lose some battles knowing he will win out at the end.

This wikipage has a nice chart of all the states and how delegates get broken up, from "winner take all" to proportional to no allocation.

[link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012|

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
36. We agree, I should have said "many" instead of all.
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

I think the key point is that Obama built up state organizations to carry on after the primary. Ron Paul has done the same thing.

Romney didn't. He used 'pop up' organizations that were designed to save money and save time and afterwards go on to the next state.

One of the ironic parts of this is that one of the ways that you build support in the party is that you absorb key staffers and incorporate them into state jobs. Romney is not doing that basically running with his own old team.

This isn't Romney's first run for the President and I think it shows that when it comes to politics he doesn't have a very good learning curve.

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

FSogol

(45,484 posts)
26. Snicker.
Thu May 3, 2012, 04:52 PM
May 2012

Last edited Thu May 3, 2012, 08:23 PM - Edit history (1)

Paul is isn't even running for President, he's just a common grifter fleecing his idiotic "followers."

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
32. Why not?
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:37 PM
May 2012

Because it's more relevant to observe the abilities (or lack thereof) of the person who WILL be the Republican nominee. Ron Paul won't pull off an upset, but Mittens' sloppy campaign work is going to make life painful until the Republican Convention is over.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
25. Wow...Imagine if Paul put this much effort into real campaigning instead of
Thu May 3, 2012, 04:05 PM
May 2012

all these under-the-rader covert machinations...

Oh yeah -- That would mean Chauncey; err...I mean Paul would actually have to show his face and talk to people and face questions that no simple soundbite answer about "liberty", "freedom", or "constitutional" could answer... Then all his worshippers are reminded of the hard reality that all this time they've been in love with the "idea" of Ron Paul as opposed to the real, flesh-and-blood person...

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
27. Rmoney has 847 delegates, Ron Paul has 80
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:31 PM
May 2012

This isn't Hillary vs Obama by any stretch of the imagination. Romney is the Republican nominee.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
37. GOP has sold their soul for wins
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:27 PM
May 2012

They have accepted any and all who would vote for R behind the name and thus have the tea party nuts, antiabortion nuts and with giving attention to Ron Paul the paulbots. Their true party members now has to suck up to all of them and will probably lose the war. For those who thinks Paul is so honest and does not bring home the bacon in the form of earmarks in which he then votes against the bills he attaches them to and I would not call honest in saying he is not for spending.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»SURPRISE! Ron Paul Destro...