Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Wall Street Journal’s pathetic attack on Elizabeth Warren
A new Op-Ed from the WSJ tries -- and fails -- to take down the Senate's liberal iconELIAS ISQUITH
In a new Op-Ed for the Wall Street Journal, Jon Cowan and Jim Kessler of the Third Way think tank warn that Democrats will only win if they ignore the recent success of Mayor Bill de Blasio and Senator Elizabeth Warren and reject economic populism. Their argument is not convincing but, surprising no one, establishment centrists like Mike Allen of Politico and Ron Fournier of National Journal loved the piece. Allen even went so far as to categorize it as a game changer (which evidently sent a thrill up the leg of whoever runs Third Ways Twitter account). But for those of us who dont already wish to see Social Security and Medicare benefits cut, Third Ways piece was little more than a reminder of the selfishness (and increasing irrelevance) of the economically plutocratic wing of the Democratic Party.
Third Ways argument is basically two parts. The first is the unobjectionable assertion that Bill de Blasio and Elizabeth Warrens economic populism has succeeded in no small part because they represent liberal electorates. Cowan and Kessler note that New York City hasnt had a mayor subsequently achieve higher office since 1869, while Massachusetts hasnt sent anyone to the White House since 1960. This strikes me as something of a non sequitur no one of consequence that I know of has argued that Warren is a shoe-in for the presidency in 2016 but the essential point, that much of America isnt as liberal as its most liberal areas, is true in a duh kind of way.
The second plank of Third Ways argument is that the recent failure of a referendum in Colorado, which sought to raise taxes in order to fund an overhaul of the states educational system, proves that economic populism is a dead end in those parts of America that arent already true blue. On the same day that Bill de Blasio won in New York City, they write, a referendum to raise taxes on high-income Coloradans to fund public education and universal pre-K failed in a landslide. On its face, this looks like a pretty convincing argument. Colorado is, after all, the consummate purple state. But as Markos Moulitsas points out, Third Way is rather egregiously misrepresenting the referendum here. It didnt simply raise taxes on high income Coloradans it raised taxes on all Coloradans. Thats a big, big difference.
In between the non-sequitur half of the argument and the wildly misleading half of the argument, Third Way unleashes a torrent of numbers intended to convince the reader that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are needed, like, yesterday. On Social Security, especially, Third Way strains to impart the fear of God to their readers, describing an imbalance between payroll tax collections and Social Security benefits as one that threatens to devour the entire Social Security Trust Fund in 2031. Third Way doesnt come right out and say that cuts are the only solution to the problem, but their pooh-poohing of Warrens proposal to lift the cap on payroll taxes implies as much. Perhaps most disappointingly, coming from a nominally Dem-aligned think tank, Third Way adopts conservative generational warfare framing in describing Warrens plan, which they call a $750 billion tax hike that hits mostly Millennials and Gen Xers.
full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/03/the_wall_street_journals_pathetic_attack_on_elizabeth_warren/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1368 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Wall Street Journal’s pathetic attack on Elizabeth Warren (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2013
OP
Business enterprises like the WSJ are no doubt eager to tamp down economic populism.
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#3
Enrique
(27,461 posts)1. ha ha the Wall Street Journal attacking Warren
i'm sure she was blindsided.
dchill
(38,505 posts)2. If Third Way - and we - reject “economic populism...”
We do so at our peril. For decades, they have seen their money in our pockets. It is past time for us to realize that our money is in their pockets. And not just a little - almost all of it.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)3. Business enterprises like the WSJ are no doubt eager to tamp down economic populism.
Gotta nip that in the bud early, right?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)4. This should leave NO DOUBT that the Third Way is a GOP-lite propaganda arm.
66 dmhlt
(1,941 posts)5. No wonder Harold Ford loves him some "Third Way"
Harold's definitely a DINO who does his Democratic imitation just to get on MSM talk shows