Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:23 AM Dec 2013

WSJ: Warren's Way or No Way

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303997604579242153546789092


Liberal Democrats try to silence two of our op-ed writers.

Remember when Bill Clinton was twice elected President as a "New Democrat" who wanted to get along with people in the private economy? Nowadays even writing in favor of ideas that Mr. Clinton supported can get you branded a heretic and banished from impolite liberal society.

Witness the political tempest that blew up in response to the December 3 op-ed we published by Democrats Jon Cowan and Jim Kessler of the Third Way think tank. The former aides to Andrew Cuomo and Chuck Schumer, respectively, would be considered liberals in most places outside of the Harvard faculty lounge. But the campus and union left that increasingly controls the Democratic Party has launched a campaign to purge them for their deviation from progressive dogma.


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
1. Good, the WSJ knows we're coming for their beloved oligarchy.
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:26 AM
Dec 2013

They like to yell "Class War" but they've never actually seen class warfare.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. "But the campus and union left that increasingly controls the Democratic Party has launched a
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:32 AM
Dec 2013
campaign to purge them for their deviation"
What complete and utter tripe and bullshit.
Third Way and Wall Street control the Democratic Party.
People are realising that Clinton's policies were more corporate than liberal.
The WSJ and Third Way peeps are starting to get mighty discomfited about the awakening of ACTUAL liberals. Maybe they should get their asses out of the Harvard faculty lounge.

Was just thinking about how strange it is that I am being directed to luv and support Hillary, when i don't know where she really stands on Social Security, Medicare, job creation, food stamps, infrastructure, etc. All I know for sure is how she stands on the TPP - she helped write it. Not that I believe much, if anything, that a Third Way candidate says when campaigning.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
4. Huh?
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:02 AM
Dec 2013
But many of today's ascendant Democrats are out to prove that they don't trust anyone who works for a profit-making institution and who doesn't also carry a union card. If their ideas are so superior, then why are they so afraid of debating them with other Democrats?


Senator Warren has not been afraid of debating anything. Or Bernie Sanders or Alan Grayson, either.

And calling out a couple of WSJ op-ed writers is not trying to silence them. Sheesh, assholes, if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. The third way is just pissed cuz they're getting called on their bullshit & people are starting to listen.

Off to make a couple of contributions to some liberal dems.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
5. "the third way is just pissed cuz they're getting called on their bullshit..."
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:13 AM
Dec 2013

and I'm loving every minute of it.

I'm so glad someone is finally calling them on it.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
6. Oh dear, Elizabeth Warren hurt the WSJ's widdle feelings.
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 01:03 PM
Dec 2013

That means whatever she's doing, she's doing it correctly.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
7. Boo-hoo, Dems are finally figuring out that some of their "leaders" are...
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 01:33 PM
Dec 2013

actually con men and women.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
12. yes, yes there are con men and women in the Democratic party.
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 03:22 PM
Dec 2013

fuck them all with a rusty chain saw.

I won't name names but there are a special couple that I have in mind.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
10. WSJ trying to set up false equivalence - Union Left = Tea Bagger Right
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 02:10 PM
Dec 2013

All part of the media meme that "Both sides have their extremists."

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
14. uh-oh: you know what happens when they start talking about "purges"--it means they're starting a new
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 06:02 PM
Dec 2013

wave: in 2006-8 the talk was all "with the House Dem, now the left is gonna start the purges--the question is, will it be a Vorkuta, or a BELŻEC??!!!!111" as they purged CT, AR, CO, PA, McKinney (and now Kucinich, Grayson, and NJ)

so for 2009-10 party discipline swung rightwards

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WSJ: Warren's Way or No ...