“That smacks of Watergate”: Expert tells Salon which charges could reach Chris Christie’s office
From conspiracy to manslaughter: Former assistant U.S. attorney assesses what charges bridge scandal could yield
JOSH EIDELSON
On Wednesday, the New Jersey U.S. Attorneys office announced the opening of a preliminary inquiry into the allegedly retaliatory closing of lanes on the George Washington Bridge. On Thursday, an attorney announced the filing of a potential class action lawsuit against Gov. Chris Christie and others on behalf of New Jersey residents affected by allegedly orchestrated traffic nightmare.
Could Chris Christie or his appointees be found guilty of a crime? To consider the potential risks to the governor, Salon called up Loyola Law Schools Laurie Levenson, a former assistant U.S. attorney and author of the Federal Criminal Rules Handbook. An edited and condensed version of our Friday conversation follows.
Based on what we know so far in New Jersey, if it were demonstrated that there were some kind of loss of life that resulted in some way from this delay, would that be grounds for some kind of manslaughter charge?
Theoretically. But really only theoretically, because there would be some difficult causation issues. This woman was in her 90s, right? And there was a claim that emergency vehicles didnt get to her in time.
In a criminal case, the burdens very high: proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [You] can anticipate that the defense is going to say, You know, really this was not enough of a contributing factor.
So, theoretically: sure. Do I anticipate prosecutors will focus on that as the likely charge? Not really.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/11/that_smacks_of_watergate_expert_tells_salon_which_charges_could_reach_chris_christies_office/