Is Hillary Clinton The President Americans Need At This Time?

[egbertowillies]

Given Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street baggage, the triangulation used by the Clintons against the GOP in the past may just be used against them in 2016.

http://egbertowillies.com/2014/02/16/hillary-clinton-wall-street/

[Scuba]

1. Sure, if the Americans in question are named Lloyd and Jamie.

[hrmjustin]

2. I like Warren but I think Hillary is better suited for the office.

[Jackpine Radical]

3. I'll take the door on the right.

[MADem]

4. Yes. And HRC is going to surprise a lotta haters, too. nt

[longship]

5. Nope. At this time we have Barack Obama as president.

Oh, and by the way. Elizabeth Warren has repeated stated that she's not interested in national office and desires to serve out her term in the US Senate.

So, if not Hillary Clinton in 2016, we're going to have find somebody else, in 2016.

[Beacool]

6. Groan.............

Another three years of the Left rending at their vestments.

What a bore...........

[msongs]

7. yes, wanting more than closet republicans is such a bore nt

[PeteSelman]

8. No. I don't think she'll EVER be the president we need.

We need someone that will fight for the People over big business. Someone that did NOT write the TPP or have any hand in that horseshit.

[indie9197]

11. Yes we do. Urgently.

Unfortunately I think it is impossible for a candidate to even get the Dem nomination without the backing of the writers of the TPP. Look what happened on the Repub side with Ron Paul at their convention. Same thing will happen on the Dem side if we pick a "radical" candidate.

[PeteSelman]

13. I agree with that.

It doesn't mean Clinton would be good for us though. She's just one of the few nails left to bang into the coffin of what was once a great nation.

[Lil Missy]

9. Elizabeth Warren is not running n/t

[Beacool]

10. They'll flog that dead horse until election day in 2016.

[wyldwolf]

17. SHE. AIN'T. RUNNING

Elizabeth Warren isn't running. I get why people persist with this fantasy, but it's nothing more than a fantasy. Warren had to be dragged in kicking and screaming into the Massachusetts Senate race, a geographically small state in which she could sleep in her own bed every night. If you barely have the fire to run for Senate, then you absolutely don't have the fire to mount a brutal presidential campaign. And even if she did, all she'd have to do is look at the polling (73-9!) to realize she'd have a million better things to do with her time and her donors' money. SHE. AIN'T. RUNNING. ~KOS

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024526420

[Hekate]

12. GOTV 2014, then come back and talk to me about a campaign that has not launched yet. nt

[DFW]

15. Amen to that

If we let the Senate go and give Bonehead another term as speaker because we were all obsessing about 2016, then we deserve whatever misery befalls us.

[Beacool]

16. The House is a lost cause, but I'm really afraid for the Senate.

The RW super PACs are pouring money into the Senate races, more money than ever and we are fighting over hypothetical 2016 races.

Gee........

[mythology]

14. If she is the Democratic nominee in 2016, I will gladly vote for her

Do I know if I want her to be the Democratic nominee yet? Absolutely not because I haven't seen the rest of the field.