THE RIGHT'S AYN RAND HYPOCRISY
The rights Ayn Rand hypocrisy: Why their religious posture is a total sham
Conservatives booted atheists from CPAC, but love a raging anti-Christian. The reason has to do with economic greed
ELIZABETH STOKER
Earlier this week, CNN
reported that American Atheists, an advocacy group for atheists and atheism, would have a booth at the 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference. The idea behind the booth was to build bridges between historically faith-motivated conservatives and their politically aligned but religiously different atheist counterparts. David Silverman, the president of American Atheists, called the booth one of many steps his organization would take in its outreach effort targeted at political conservatives.
But the Atheists attempt to extend an olive branch was evidently ill-received by the organizers of the CPAC, who have now
disallowed the group from sponsoring its planned informational booth. Apparently most conservatives werent amused by Silvermans comments to CNN concerning the Christian right: I am not worried about making the Christian right angry. The Christian right should be angry that we are going in to enlighten conservatives. The Christian right should be threatened by us.
So much for American Atheists short-lived liberation effort, which seems to have been aimed as much at bringing to light already-existing atheist sentiments on the right as in inculcating them into current believers. But if the American Atheists goal is to make public quiet inklings of atheism in seemingly faith-saturated conservative circles, an incendiary conversion attempt based out of a booth at CPAC is likely the worst tack to take. After all, a much more successful war against religion on the right has been waged by none other than perpetual philosophical train wreck and failed film critic Ayn Rand.
Rand is perhaps the only virulently anti-Christian writer that Republicans nonetheless routinely feel comfortable heaping praise upon. In a charming 1964 interview with Playboy, Rand described the crucifixion of Jesus in terms of
mythology, and submitted that she would feel indignant over such a sacrifice of virtue to vice. That Christians are called to care for the most vulnerable of Gods people was, to Rand, manifest proof that the religion has nothing constructive to add to human life: After all, in her philosophy, superiors have no moral obligations to those weaker or more vulnerable than they. According to Rand, the Christian moral imperative to serve the needy is a monstrous idea.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/02/28/the_rights_ayn_rand_hypocrisy_why_their_religious_posture_is_a_total_sham/