2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton isn’t talking about Ferguson. That’s not a bad thing.
By Paul Waldman August 26 at 12:16 PM
Are you dying to hear what Hillary Clinton has to say about the events in Ferguson, MO? A lot of people seem to be. Heres an article in Politico about the fact that she ignored a reporters question about it at a book signing. &feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">Heres a CNN panel discussing her silence. Heres a Huffington Post article on the same topic.
Theres an assumption here that deserves examination, one articulated by Al Sharpton last week. This is now a national, central issue, and anyone running for president needs to come up with a formula, or, in my opinion, they forfeit their right to be taken seriously, Sharpton said. Im amazed that were not hearing from leading candidates
Chris Christie or Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.
Raise your hand if you think that Clinton, not to mention Christie, Bush, or anybody else thinking about running for president, has something particularly profound or insightful to add, a comment that would make the millions who heard it say, Thats fascinating I hadnt thought about it that way, and this really changes my perspective on the issue. Anyone?
Obviously, we dont want presidential candidates to just skate by without having to take a stand on important controversies. But if were going to say that candidates have to weigh in on a topic, then there ought to be a reason, beyond the simple fact that they might be running. Theres no shortage of people talking about this subject already, after all.
Here are some good reasons why we should demand that candidates talk about a particular topic. Perhaps its an issue theyve been vocal about, or involved in, before. For instance, Jeb Bush wrote a book about immigration reform, so he should be asked about the current immigration controversies. Hillary Clinton worked on health care reform in the 1990s, so its worth knowing what she thinks about the state of Affordable Care Act implementation. Or perhaps its an issue that the next president will have to deal with, like the situation in Iraq and Syria. It most likely wont be resolved in the next two years, and we should know what each candidates perspective on it is. Or perhaps theres an issue of federal law, like the controversy over tax inversions, and we want to get them on record now so we can understand what actions they might take. Or perhaps they bring a unique perspective to it; as the only female (possible) candidate, Hillary Clinton can speak to issues like discrimination in the workplace in a way other candidates might not be able to.
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/26/hillary-clinton-isnt-talking-about-ferguson-thats-not-a-bad-thing/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It has been going on since we landed here in chains and if we are all going to live together, we need to fix the broken system. I'd like to know her thoughts if she wants my vote.
The author seems to think it's an issue that will go away and minimizes the problem.
As it IS an issue that the next president will have to deal with, just like they will have to deal with Iraq and Syria, it falls under things that need to be discussed. Unless the author this that the oppressive nature of the racism inherent in the PIC will somehow solve itself.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)discussed in the past. If we can't even expect a candidate to mention an issue, why would we believe they'd be willing/able to take action to address it? If a candidate fails to discuss an issue now, is that a magical guarantee they won't be confronted with it after they've been elected? I'd like to see how a potential leader deals with things that maybe aren't in his/her wheelhouse.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)HRC to have spoken on Michael Brown, the shooting, and the conditions that led to the shooting, including the militarization of police forces, the lack of representation of PoC on police forces, and the media's conduct to this point.
In fact, it is/will be a chit that will go on my 2016 primary scale.
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)with weak sauce.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... to the list of media doofuses who think they have a point but don't.
JaydenD
(294 posts)and for her not to address what happened in Ferguson is worthy of suspicion of what her values really are.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)them accountable for anything they're not addressing. No doubt she'll (HRC) will also have to answer why she took so long in making a statement about Ferguson. But then she's a smart cookie and will get around the issue in a very diplomatic way.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)Ferguson will be a just something that happend back in 2014