Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

a kennedy

(29,655 posts)
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 04:09 PM Oct 2014

Gardner Opens Up A Big Lead In Key Colorado Senate Race

Rep. Cory Gardner (R-CO) has opened up an seven-point lead over Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO), according to a new Suffolk University poll.

The poll found Gardner leading 46 percent to 39 percent among likely voters. Back in mid-September, Suffolk gave Gardner just a one-point advantage, 43 percent to 42 percent.

It is the biggest lead that Gardner has seen over the last month, during which time early voting has already started; Fox News and Quinnipiac University had shown him up by six points earlier in October.

The Suffolk University poll, conducted Oct. 18 to 21, surveyed 500 likely voters. Its margin of error is 4.4 points.

According to TPM's PollTracker average, Udall currently holds a slight edge, 46.1 percent to 46 percent.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/colorado-senate-race-suffolk-university-oct-22

D*mn.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gardner Opens Up A Big Lead In Key Colorado Senate Race (Original Post) a kennedy Oct 2014 OP
Suffolk Robbins Oct 2014 #1
Ok, well that's good to know..... a kennedy Oct 2014 #2
I've seen other polls showing Udall ahead at this point bigdarryl Oct 2014 #3
I can't believe that. Gardner is a fucking idiot and it shows everytime he opens his mouth Autumn Oct 2014 #4
His father sells tractors! DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #6
Yeah and his values came in handy when when he played football... Autumn Oct 2014 #8
He watched a movie in which Reagan didn't play football DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #9
Suffolk does not have a great record outside of MA. Mass Oct 2014 #5
I just turned in my ballot this morning evemac Oct 2014 #7
The poll tracker Mutiny In Heaven Oct 2014 #10
What happened to Udall's support? demwing Oct 2014 #11
I doubt that it's changed much FBaggins Oct 2014 #12

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
1. Suffolk
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 04:11 PM
Oct 2014

Is pollster who said back In 2012 they were going to stop polling NC,virginia,and florida because there was no way Obama could win
there.He won 2 of 3.I don't take them seriously.

Can I buy garner ahead.Yeah but not by this much.

Autumn

(45,066 posts)
8. Yeah and his values came in handy when when he played football...
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 05:47 PM
Oct 2014

Oops, what's that you say? He never played football? One of those Reagan moments there.

DavidDvorkin

(19,475 posts)
9. He watched a movie in which Reagan didn't play football
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:23 PM
Oct 2014

Close enough.

I hate those made-up "values". What are Colorado values? How do they differ from values in other states? Stupid catchwords and buzz phrases. What's even worse is that they work.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
5. Suffolk does not have a great record outside of MA.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 04:24 PM
Oct 2014

This said, it is clear that Udall is up for a rough ride (way too close for comfort), but this reliance on every individual poll is beyond ridiculous.

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
10. The poll tracker
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 05:43 AM
Oct 2014

Shows Gardner up by 3 points. Probably because of that one poll; those taken over the next week are going to be telling. Could be a false flag, could be that Colorado has broken definitively for Gardner.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
11. What happened to Udall's support?
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 09:36 AM
Oct 2014

Just a month ago he was well ahead (and had been so all year). What the hell changed? Can anyone in Colorado explain?

FBaggins

(26,732 posts)
12. I doubt that it's changed much
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 09:59 AM
Oct 2014

This isn't entiely unexpected. He was polling (with some variability of course) in the mid-40s for most of the year (I assume that this poll and the most recent Fox & Quinnipiac polls are parial outlying datapoints).

A well-known incumbent polling in the mid 40s is usually in serious trouble (assuming a substanially 2-way race). Undecided's are somewhat more likely to break toward the challenger as the election nears unless the incumbent is able to drive up the challenger's negatives.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gardner Opens Up A Big Le...