2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSenate Democrats Not Running Or Already Retired Sit On $52 Million
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats who aren't running for re-election this year and those who have retired were sitting on nearly $52 million in campaign cash at the end of September, even as their party's candidates are slogging through a difficult electoral cycle.
That untouched pot of money has become a sore subject for Democratic strategists, several of whom privately complained that the lawmakers were risking the Senate majority to protect their own hides. What's further agitated these strategists is that some Democratic senators who are running for re-election with comfortable leads have also stashed away cash while their colleagues struggle in tight races.
"We all get multiple daily desperate emails begging for money, especially as Democrats are on the verge of losing the Senate," said one top strategist who, like the others, would only speak about the matter anonymously for fear of retribution. "Meanwhile, some senators are sitting on millions while colleagues like [Georgia candidate Michelle] Nunn and [Iowa candidate Rep. Bruce] Braley are fighting for their political lives and to keep the majority."
Complaints about the generosity of individual lawmakers are an element of every single campaign. The gripes expressed here have arisen in cycles past; they will in cycles future. What is irksome for party officials, however, is that the situation for Democrats in 2014 is so dire. The electoral map is large and fluctuating, and as the midterm campaigns enter their closing days, operatives want to be running hard in states like Georgia or Iowa without having to take resources away from other close contests. Two officials told The Huffington Post that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), unhappy with the contributions so far, has been pushing his members to give more cash to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/23/senate-democrats-fundraising_n_6037296.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)former Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), who has more than $9.8 million in his campaign account despite having left office in 2010
On Thursday, Bayh told The Huffington Post that he had been generous with his remaining campaign funds, having transferred roughly $1.5 million over the last three years to other Democrats. Part of the reason he wasn't doing more, he said, was that he was advised "by former colleagues who retired and had given significant money to some of the committees" that those donations went unappreciated.
This dude could get hit by a bus tomorrow, and then what would happen to the $9.8 million??
How fraking selfish is he and these other folks?
Ugh!!
4dsc
(5,787 posts)I am very disappointed in retiring Iowa Senator Harkin who is sitting on $5 million. He could be helping to secure his seat in the Senate but instead is sitting on the sidelines counting his money.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)We are suppose to give until it hurts, but they can sit on their lumps of campaign cash. I'd be interested in how much all of these people are sitting on.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)and beg for money.
Tom Harkin is probably tired. While he was in Congress, no one listened to him. Democrats didn't have his back when he pushed for the public option. Now the Democratic Party candidate they put up with weak! That candidate will likely lose. I don't blame Harkin; I wouldn't waste my money on that bullshit either.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I have supported a few this time around, none of them are in my home state which is pretty safe all the way around since the Republicans can't find a decent candidate.
I am concerned if the Joni "Pig Castrator" wins, how much more dysfunctional the Senate will become.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Not to organizations.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)surpluses should have to be zero'd out in a set period of time...this practice is done by ALL politicians. They see it as their "nest egg"