Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tony_FLADEM

(3,023 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 01:08 AM Oct 2014

Senate Democrats Not Running Or Already Retired Sit On $52 Million

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats who aren't running for re-election this year and those who have retired were sitting on nearly $52 million in campaign cash at the end of September, even as their party's candidates are slogging through a difficult electoral cycle.

That untouched pot of money has become a sore subject for Democratic strategists, several of whom privately complained that the lawmakers were risking the Senate majority to protect their own hides. What's further agitated these strategists is that some Democratic senators who are running for re-election with comfortable leads have also stashed away cash while their colleagues struggle in tight races.

"We all get multiple daily desperate emails begging for money, especially as Democrats are on the verge of losing the Senate," said one top strategist who, like the others, would only speak about the matter anonymously for fear of retribution. "Meanwhile, some senators are sitting on millions while colleagues like [Georgia candidate Michelle] Nunn and [Iowa candidate Rep. Bruce] Braley are fighting for their political lives and to keep the majority."

Complaints about the generosity of individual lawmakers are an element of every single campaign. The gripes expressed here have arisen in cycles past; they will in cycles future. What is irksome for party officials, however, is that the situation for Democrats in 2014 is so dire. The electoral map is large and fluctuating, and as the midterm campaigns enter their closing days, operatives want to be running hard in states like Georgia or Iowa without having to take resources away from other close contests. Two officials told The Huffington Post that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), unhappy with the contributions so far, has been pushing his members to give more cash to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/23/senate-democrats-fundraising_n_6037296.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats Not Running Or Already Retired Sit On $52 Million (Original Post) Tony_FLADEM Oct 2014 OP
"those donations went unappreciated"... Really, Retired Sen. Evan Bayh...Really? KeepItReal Oct 2014 #1
Show us how greed works 4dsc Oct 2014 #2
Yet they keep pounding Democrats with emails begging for more money davidpdx Oct 2014 #3
They will not get one red cent from me. Go to Hollyweird. Go the rich, wealthy donors Liberal_Stalwart71 Oct 2014 #5
I give money directly to candidates davidpdx Oct 2014 #6
Yep. Exactly! That's exactly what I do. I give money directly to candidates ONLY. Liberal_Stalwart71 Oct 2014 #7
big flaw in campaign finances beachbum bob Oct 2014 #4

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
1. "those donations went unappreciated"... Really, Retired Sen. Evan Bayh...Really?
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 01:59 AM
Oct 2014
former Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), who has more than $9.8 million in his campaign account despite having left office in 2010

On Thursday, Bayh told The Huffington Post that he had been generous with his remaining campaign funds, having transferred roughly $1.5 million over the last three years to other Democrats. Part of the reason he wasn't doing more, he said, was that he was advised "by former colleagues who retired and had given significant money to some of the committees" that those donations went unappreciated.



This dude could get hit by a bus tomorrow, and then what would happen to the $9.8 million??

How fraking selfish is he and these other folks?

Ugh!!


 

4dsc

(5,787 posts)
2. Show us how greed works
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 07:27 AM
Oct 2014

I am very disappointed in retiring Iowa Senator Harkin who is sitting on $5 million. He could be helping to secure his seat in the Senate but instead is sitting on the sidelines counting his money.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. Yet they keep pounding Democrats with emails begging for more money
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 07:59 AM
Oct 2014

We are suppose to give until it hurts, but they can sit on their lumps of campaign cash. I'd be interested in how much all of these people are sitting on.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
5. They will not get one red cent from me. Go to Hollyweird. Go the rich, wealthy donors
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 10:37 AM
Oct 2014

and beg for money.

Tom Harkin is probably tired. While he was in Congress, no one listened to him. Democrats didn't have his back when he pushed for the public option. Now the Democratic Party candidate they put up with weak! That candidate will likely lose. I don't blame Harkin; I wouldn't waste my money on that bullshit either.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
6. I give money directly to candidates
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 09:52 PM
Oct 2014

I have supported a few this time around, none of them are in my home state which is pretty safe all the way around since the Republicans can't find a decent candidate.

I am concerned if the Joni "Pig Castrator" wins, how much more dysfunctional the Senate will become.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
7. Yep. Exactly! That's exactly what I do. I give money directly to candidates ONLY.
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 02:06 AM
Oct 2014

Not to organizations.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
4. big flaw in campaign finances
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 08:00 AM
Oct 2014

surpluses should have to be zero'd out in a set period of time...this practice is done by ALL politicians. They see it as their "nest egg"

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Senate Democrats Not Runn...