Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EEO

(1,620 posts)
Sun May 24, 2015, 01:55 PM May 2015

Majority of Iraqis Miss Saddam Hussein, Blame America

Some satire commenting on the state of Iraq...

Majority of Iraqis Miss Saddam Hussein, Blame America

::SNIP::

In the midst of a war with the Islamic State (ISIS) a large percentage of Iraqis said they missed their deposed and executed dictator Saddam Hussein, according to poll results released today. Over 80% of Iraq's population pined for the years of internal stability Saddam Hussein maintained by ruthlessly cracking down on political dissenters and sectarian religious conflicts.

::SNIP::

&

::SNIP::

"Saddam Hussein was a dictator who checked Iran's influence in the region and made sure extremist groups like al-Qaed could not set up shop in Iraq. So American propaganda that painted Saddam as a religious zealot patiently sitting on nukes was pretty stupid," stated Hashim Boutros.

::SNIP::

Source: The Nil Admirari
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
3. funny and sad
Sun May 24, 2015, 07:34 PM
May 2015

at the same time.

THIS his how far gone this country is, the republicans have come to BELIEVE their bullshit, and the people of the country just go along with it ...

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
4. The war with ISIS will either make Iraq as a country or break it. I doubt the kurds and Shias miss
Sun May 24, 2015, 11:25 PM
May 2015

him that much.

EEO

(1,620 posts)
5. He was good for our interests in the region.
Mon May 25, 2015, 02:04 AM
May 2015

But we had the man who stole the last presidential election with help from the Supreme Court, and Dick Cheney beating the drums for a war that has definitely hurt our interests in the Middle East, as well as globally.

Igel

(35,275 posts)
6. The numbers say otherwise.
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:27 AM
May 2015

What, perhaps 30% Sunni? Assuming you trust that stat. (It's a bit off, but it's hard to get a reliable count. Sunnis thought of themselves as a clear majority of the population under Saddam.)

80% of the population "miss" Saddam. Assuming you trust the poll.

That means of the remaining population, Kurds and Shi'ites, around 50% valued the stability under his reign.

"I doubt X miss him that much" I'd quantify as being 20% or less.

Igel

(35,275 posts)
7. They have to blame somebody.
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:39 AM
May 2015

To blame themselves would entail dishonoring themselves.

Nothing was done to prepare them for self-rule; the dictator would have found such preparation counter-productive, since to the extent the population doesn't need him is the extent to which he's utterly and obviously dispensable.

And, in keeping with Saddam's admiration for Stalin and in keeping with long-standing Ottoman tradition, Saddam did things to intentionally fracture and fragment society so that it would be unified only in the face of outside threat and only be able to unite behind him. Thus increasing the extent to which he was utterly and obviously indispensable.

It also has to be said that some societies rank stability above freedom. The two are at odds with each other. China and Russia, polls show, both value stability and safety above political and social freedoms by a wide margin. I suspect Arab cultures are likely to be the same.

The way to square the circle wrt freedom and stability is to have a large degree of freedom but a high degree of individual self-control and internalization of societal norms. Franklin's reported to have said that we have a democracy, but that demands a virtuous society. The school district I live in faced this: One subculture did not have highly internalized norms while the dominant one of long-standing had. As the demographics changed, and the amount of freedom students enjoyed stayed the same--with a different expression of that freedom--the schools lost stability. To restore the stability required for classroom-style education, freedoms were sharply curtailed. The point is that freedoms were curtailed to return to the behavioral norms that were prevalent a decade before. (They haven't reached that point yet and may not, since the rule system is becoming nearly dictatorial and at some point we say, 'Enough!' Now, instead of perhaps 1-2 fights a month, they have nearly one fight per day. Referral rates are way up, suspensions are up, and they've gone from having nearly a 90% pass rate on all their state tests to 68%.)

When social trust breaks down, freedom need to be replaced by stability. Nobody behaves around those they consider enemies and lesser people; nobody trusts those they consider enemies and lesser people to properly use the freedoms they have. (Note that measures of of social trust in the US have plummeted in the last 40 years, and that everybody seems to have a vested interest in overgrazing in that particular commons.)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
9. And yet the neocon MIC suckers in both parties
Mon May 25, 2015, 12:37 PM
May 2015

are screaming for another boots on the ground invasion to save poor Iraq once again!

How many fucking times do we have to send poor american kids to the shithole middle east to die horrible deaths in defense of people who will hate their fucking guts for it???

Not to mention the billions and billions and billions of dollars it costs! We can't afford social security, Medicaid, food assistance, infrastructure repair or improvements, roads going to hell, bridges going to hell, but.....

FUCK YES TRILLIONS FOR WAR ANYTIME ANYWHERE!!!!! GOD BLESS AMERIKA!!!1!!11!@!!!! LETS ROLL!!!!!1111@@!!!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Majority of Iraqis Miss S...