2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCecilia Vega (ABC) joins GOP campaign against HRC asking her "Do you have a PERCEPTION PROBLEM?"
YOu won't hear Vega say it on ABC's video of the encounter, though. All you'll hear is Vega saying:: "..Many Americans don't believe you told the truth on Benghazi." But what was broadcast on Friday was Vega saying "Do you have a perception problem?" You could barely hear the rest: "..many Americans don't believe .... you told the truth on Benghazi"
"Do you have a perception problem."
Really, Cecilia? Are we supposed to be impressed with this [FONT SIZE="4"]Punk-Ass remark of a question[/FONT]? Since you are supposed to be playing an actual journalist on tv, you should acquaint yourself with the issue. I know you probably don't give a shit about this but after the completion of the sixth inquisition on Benghazi the GOP controlled committee issued their report. It found there was NO EVIDENCE OF ANY WRONGDOING, NO EVIDENCE OF A COVERUP, NO EVIDENCE OF A 'STAND DOWN' ORDER. After six inquisitions, hundreds of witnesses, thousands of hours of testimony, what did they come up with? NOTHING. ..(oh, but they did get a lot of air time for casting innuendos and insinuations by "news casters" such as yourself repeating that the question was asked of HRC). By the way Cici, you should look up Joe McCarthy. He's the spiritual inspiration of the GOP.
GOP-Controlled Intelligence Committee Debunks Benghazi Conspiracies
The report, which was released on Friday after a two-year-long investigation, responded to a number of long-running theories about the attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others.
The report found that there was no evidence of a stand-down order and that there was no advanced warning of the attack, two canards that have been reported by media outlets such as Fox News.
The report said that the process used to create a series of contested talking points by thenU.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice was flawed, but the report did not say that Rice or the administration had intentionally misled the public with those talking points.
.... I'm sure you are unaware of this fact, Cecilia, but a poll taken by FOX News asked the question:
AND HOW DID THOSE POLLED ANSWER?
...30% said the Republicans were holding Benghazi hearings "TO GET TO THE TRUTH"
...63% said the Republicans were holding Benghazi hearings "FOR POLITCAL GAIN"
Fox News Polls finds 63% think Congressional Republicans are using Benghazi "for political gain".
... So I have to ask Cecilia, DO YOU HAVE A COMPREHENSION PROBLEM??
Oh, hell. I know you don't. You just threw that Ass-Hole remark-question to show the GOP how happy you are to perform oral tricks for them. With the pay-off being you'll rise in the ranks at ABC. Well, you're probably right.
I know you couldn't care less about this, but when you are on reading the news I will be watching CBS, or NBC.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)or bacteria? C. vega
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)and my blood pressure is still at its max ...
The sycophants sat there taking Joe's lead, babbling about the Clintons this, Clintons that.
Everyone of them outside of Joe said "it isn't illegal, BUT!" this and than ...
Spinning, spinning, spinning ...
Douchebag Willie Geist babbled a half dozen times, it shows they have a LOT of money!, it shows they have a LOT of money ...
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)so what is HRC talking about?
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)next week? Maybe you'd like her to mouth off like all the GOP Twit Candidates. Democrats expect a more deliberate thought process from a Presidential candidate than GOPers obviously do.