2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumit turns out the BLM protester is NOT a supporter of Sarah Palin
Despite reports saying otherwise, Marissa Johnson, the Black Lives Matter activist who interrupted Bernie Sanders, does not support Sarah Palin or the Tea Party, She spoke about this in a brand new interview, criticizing "white liberals" for enabling a "white supremacist society."
http://www.examiner.com/article/blm-protester-who-interrupted-bernie-sanders-does-not-support-sarah-palin
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)did she say anything about how that pesky SP button got on her back-pack?
I'm guessing not.
marble falls
(57,112 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)These are two people who on the surface appear to be very different but they have one very big thing in common, they are both trolls. If a person's purpose is to sow division then this "evolution" makes sense, it has nothing to do with ideology and everything to do with creating conflict.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Sarah or not, she's got a few screws loose.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)When Marissa Johnson said:
Who is "the other side" that she's working for?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Smart money is on Lincoln Chafee.
jfern
(5,204 posts)FSogol
(45,491 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)to pull one off.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)That makes no sense.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Jokes don't have to make sense.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)FSogol
(45,491 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)She was better off sticking with Sarah.
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)She has that same 15 minutes of greed thing going.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)She says "We" and "Us" a lot as though she represents a lot more people than just herself.
She also says she is a Christian extremist, which doesn't really define.
All this goes to the question - if you criticize her are you attacking black people, women, or christians or....an individual and their actions?
mmonk
(52,589 posts)You haven't gotten the rules straight yet?
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Love one, hate the other, and only every find the worst you can about them.
Granted, romney was terrible so I get it there, but here we are with two candidates we can all find things to love about and our, in general, on 'our' side.
The 'best' one is, imho, the one you have the most trust in to do the most progressive job. I don't like many things about Clinton, but there are many things I do. Compared to those on the other side of the aisle she is awesome. Sanders isn't perfect either, hell, no one we will to get to run is.
It all seems a bit over the top how some handle the primaries here, as though saying positive or negative about someone's position, actions, etc, is a personal attack on them. This leads to more angry attacks against the opposing candidate to get back at the person you see as 'on the other side'.
It boils down to this:
Whether you are poor, white, black, hispanic, American Indian, gay, straight, whatever - no one on the right is going to push for any progressive measures for you. They will push against the epa, education, unions, and spend more on wars and the rich.
Sometimes I think we forget who the real enemy is in our haste to 'win' and argument.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
sibelian
(7,804 posts)She can be perfectly well understood on the grounds of the rest of what she thinks.
Black lives matter whether the message comes from a Republican, Democrat, or anything else. I don't think her other political opinions should make a difference.