Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:17 PM Aug 2015

How much longer is the "Name recognition"excuse going to be used?

To have been in hiding for 20 years in Congress and the Senate, and now trying to get a name out as the only person who can beat Hillary. I wonder when that excuse for poor polling numbers will finally be tucked away?

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much longer is the "Name recognition"excuse going to be used? (Original Post) Sheepshank Aug 2015 OP
A year from now everybody will know his name. nt WDIM Aug 2015 #1
Good one. jwirr Aug 2015 #10
So one more year of whining. Got it. Thx. Nt Sheepshank Aug 2015 #11
but that is optional, you aren't required to do that n/t virtualobserver Aug 2015 #34
When we are chanting his name in praise. WDIM Aug 2015 #40
Not gonna provide any more loyalty oaths Sheepshank Aug 2015 #42
As he takes the stage for his nomination speech WDIM Aug 2015 #43
ROFLMAO. nt Snotcicles Aug 2015 #2
It could continue to be used until we are actually SheilaT Aug 2015 #3
when he gets the fucking press attention restorefreedom Aug 2015 #4
Most Americans don't even vote, let alone pay attention to politics. Alittleliberal Aug 2015 #5
Shit, they took the roof off in LA, soley by word of mouth. lol. nt Snotcicles Aug 2015 #6
Where was Obama in August 2007? jberryhill Aug 2015 #7
Untill everyone knows the rest of the candidates as well as they know Hillary. Then we can get down jwirr Aug 2015 #8
Hillary had the benefit of a decade of nonstop front page scandal! m-lekktor Aug 2015 #9
well if he'd changed his last name to Kardashian he'd be the most well-known name out there. nt magical thyme Aug 2015 #12
imagine if someone from THAT train wreck of a family ran for office? KittyWampus Aug 2015 #15
That's the best you can do? He must be doing something right! arcane1 Aug 2015 #13
It appears it's the best Bernie supporters can do to explain the poll numbers nt Sheepshank Aug 2015 #16
Hopefully you'll stop "whining" about us someday arcane1 Aug 2015 #18
Not very likely. Nt Sheepshank Aug 2015 #19
Yes you will... January 2016 magicmama Aug 2015 #22
'Shrooms? okasha Aug 2015 #24
Only if you're buying bro! Alittleliberal Aug 2015 #28
So forceful....so wrong lol. Nt Sheepshank Aug 2015 #33
Who's paying attention now? Not many people. Check back in February. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #14
Maybe. Sheepshank Aug 2015 #17
if that's still true in February then you'll be right ibegurpard Aug 2015 #41
We wouldn't have to use that excuse if the debates were scheduled earlier. bobbobbins01 Aug 2015 #20
Have Wasserman-Schultz move up the debates magicmama Aug 2015 #21
When the poll numbers support it. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #23
I have no doubt it exists right now to some minor extent Sheepshank Aug 2015 #26
The MSM refuses to cover him, and it is early. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #27
Especially in Iowa where she's still leading. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #25
About as long as the "Bernie doesn't love black people enough" excuse continues. aikoaiko Aug 2015 #29
Until there have been one or two debates -- and after there is fair coverage of the campaigns Armstead Aug 2015 #30
Fair enough. Nt Sheepshank Aug 2015 #32
Bring on the debates! n/t Skwmom Aug 2015 #31
Everybody knew Hillary in 2008 too. nt. neverforget Aug 2015 #35
Give it to mid October, after the first debate. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #36
As long as tptb keep Martin O'Malley from introducing himself via DEBATES! elleng Aug 2015 #37
TOPS Ron Green Aug 2015 #38
When will the poor excuse for "polls" be finally tucked away? nt artislife Aug 2015 #39

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
40. When we are chanting his name in praise.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:47 PM
Aug 2015

I hope he has your support.

This country is due for some real change.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
42. Not gonna provide any more loyalty oaths
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:56 PM
Aug 2015

Doesn't matter how many times it's been said, another yahoo comes along and asks the same fucking question.

Well, no more. I'm done playing the conciliatory Dem past member. Until you fix your own team, I'm not going to consider any statement. You've got too many on your team that have said they will not vote for Hillary if she is the Dem Nominee. Fix that first and the. We'll talk.

Ps chanting his name in praise? Wtf. I imagine some of your own cringed at that lol

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
43. As he takes the stage for his nomination speech
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 10:19 PM
Aug 2015

Bernie Bernie Bernie! It just takes a spark the timber is ready to ignite,

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
3. It could continue to be used until we are actually
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:22 PM
Aug 2015

in primary/caucus season.

Most Senators and Representatives aren't on the national stage, unlike say a First Lady or a Secretary of State. It's scary how many people don't know who their Senators, Representatives, or Governors are. And for the state rep or senator? Frightening lack of knowledge.

Also, I'm not sure how much actual national coverage Bernie is getting, especially compared to the Donald. In my case, I don't own a TV so I don't watch what passes for Main Stream Media. I do get my local paper, and I don't believe he's been mentioned at all there. Were I not on DU, did I not frequent various other alternative and left-wing sites, I'd barely have heard of him myself.

Alittleliberal

(528 posts)
5. Most Americans don't even vote, let alone pay attention to politics.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:22 PM
Aug 2015

Name recognition is part of politics and a corrupt media that is suppressing a fairly explosive campaign is a reality of 2015. He has not been hiding. He has been one of the most out spoken voices for ALL liberal causes for 20 years. Politics is complex and people talking about one issue that is related to Bernie's stance in the polls it is not an excuse. It's an observation. Cut this divisive shit out. You do your preferred candidate no favors.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
8. Untill everyone knows the rest of the candidates as well as they know Hillary. Then we can get down
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:26 PM
Aug 2015

to issues.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
9. Hillary had the benefit of a decade of nonstop front page scandal!
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:29 PM
Aug 2015

much of it contrived foolishness, yes, but still it happened. how can anybody else remotely compete with that as far as name recognition/exposure goes!!?

 

magicmama

(50 posts)
22. Yes you will... January 2016
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:51 PM
Aug 2015

When Iowa hands Bernie a decisive victory, while Clinton places 3rd AGAIN. Same for NH - a MASSIVE victory for Bernie, with a surprise upset in South Carolina..... then Super Tuesday will finish off Clinton with zero path to the nomination AS predicted.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
20. We wouldn't have to use that excuse if the debates were scheduled earlier.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:46 PM
Aug 2015

Keeping Bernie an unknown for as long as possible is in the best interest of certain people.

 

magicmama

(50 posts)
21. Have Wasserman-Schultz move up the debates
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:49 PM
Aug 2015

from October 13th to tomorrow.

Then the Name Recognition excuse can be dismissed. Until then, deal with it - and the blame goes squarely to the DNC for shielding Clinton.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
23. When the poll numbers support it.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 08:54 PM
Aug 2015

For instance: http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/150802_topline_trend_v4_KD.pdf

This poll came out yesterday, if you look at page 15 you will see that 42% of the people polled either have not heard of Sen. Sanders or have heard of him but have not formed an opinion about him.


Unlike Hillary where that number is more like 4%.


Reality, it exists.


 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
26. I have no doubt it exists right now to some minor extent
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:02 PM
Aug 2015

?..but damn it seems his team isn't working hard enough to get the word out.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
27. The MSM refuses to cover him, and it is early.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:03 PM
Aug 2015

Nobody really even starts getting serious about this until after Labor Day (except us junkies). Even then, nothing really matters until after a couple debates.

Once we get past a couple of those we can start to see what the race really looks like. Right now it really is just guess work.


 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
30. Until there have been one or two debates -- and after there is fair coverage of the campaigns
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:09 PM
Aug 2015

If people don't like him after that, then so be it.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
36. Give it to mid October, after the first debate.
Tue Aug 11, 2015, 09:22 PM
Aug 2015

By the time you're carving your turkey Bernie will be carving out a nice gain in the polls.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How much longer is the &q...