Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politico Journalist Admits Pretty Much That They Were Stirring the Pot Against Hillary (Original Post) ericson00 Aug 2015 OP
I would never use "premier" to describe Politico. DURHAM D Aug 2015 #1
while I tacitly agree, problem is these days, I can get a better sense from them than ericson00 Aug 2015 #3
The MSM determines the dialogue ORjohn Aug 2015 #2
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
3. while I tacitly agree, problem is these days, I can get a better sense from them than
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:57 AM
Aug 2015

I can from CNN even, let alone Fox. I use MSNBC since they've started being nice to the Clintons (Matthews no longer is full of venom, and they've led ending the Perot-Myth as widespread), but still I need more than MSNBC and RCP or AP.

ORjohn

(36 posts)
2. The MSM determines the dialogue
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:11 PM
Aug 2015

I would rather see the issues and alternative candidates viewpoints presented instead of ignoring candidates like Saunders that are not "corporate compatible."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politico Journalist Admit...