2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVermont electorate is 95% white
And if there's any "statistic" or "number" which can be cited as to why Bernie Sanders should be the next President of the United States, it's that.
Consider:
Would anyone disagree that, historically, a typical, garden-variety politician cynically caters only to those few big-money individuals and entities who can bankroll their elections, and will pander to those segments of the electorate whose votes they need to get/retain into office?
And that, historically, a typical garden-variety politician will likewise outright ignore those individuals whose money won't go his way and will similarly ignore -- or even be hostile to -- those segments of the electorate whose votes he doesn't need?
And is it agreed that if every single black, hispanic, and other minority member of Vermont's electorate were to have voted against Sanders in all his Congressional elections, it would not have made a bit of difference to his getting into office?
And yet, though Sanders has never needed Vermont's minority votes, he has spent his entire Congressional career with as sterling a record on civil rights as there is.
This type of politician is a dying breed in this nation: someone who actually gives a damn about everyone, regardless if they can help him get into office or not.
If there's a better measure of a candidate's fitness for the highest office in the land, I'd like to hear it.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Some of us have fought for equal rights for all, some of us have worked for justice for people of color, some of us believe we are all equal in worth. Bernie does too.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Hopefully those of us who were brought up that way, can spot another from a mile away.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)You would think that any place in America with a white population of 95% would be Tea Bag City.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)However, that is probably the reason he voted against the Brady Act.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Until 1992, Vermont had voted Democratic once. and Leahy is still the only Democrat ever elected Senator from Vermont.
cali
(114,904 posts)who said (to paraphrase) that we should declare victory in Vietnam and get out. It was Vermont Senator Ralph Flanders who took the lead against McCarthy. Vermont Senator Stafford was an early leader in the environmental movement. Both the Stafford Act and Stafford loans are named for him.
I could go on. In any case, Vermont has long been socially liberal and an environmentalist haven. We have come late to economic justice
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Starting in the early 1960s, liberals fleeing cities in NY and Mass tended to settle there (as opposed to NH, which attracted conservatives with its low taxes), resulting in Vermont electing its first Democratic governor in 100 years in 1963. That attracted even more liberals. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/01/new-vermont-is-liberal-but-old-vermont-is-still-there/
Bernie left Brooklyn for Vermont in 1968. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
jfern
(5,204 posts)Ford won it by 11 points, winning every county, and he lost.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)But eventually they were. Ford would be a Dem in today's world.
cali
(114,904 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)But a cursory glance over the history of the world demonstrates a somewhat different picture and white Americans are no exception.
This idea that white people are inherently right wing is actually something of a Republicanism.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)he saw the plight of people of color, and decided that it was worth fighting for. I know the neighborhood that he lived in, and it is a very mixed area (at least it was 40 or more years ago, and Bernie is only a little older than I am).
He fought when he was in college in Chicago, and has not stopped.
And I would be so proud if a Brooklyn boy got the presidency. It's about time, as far as I'm concerned!
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)2 blocks from the brooklyn border. when i was a kid mom and i would take the bus to go downtown (fulton st.) shopping. the bus went through the african american neighborhoods. i remember my mom saying "colored people (that's what they were called back then) want the same thing for their families as white people do."
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Your mom & mine said the same thing, and the same way.....
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)here they want so desperately to have a woman president that theyre willing to lie about a really good man, just to make their conservatism and cultism bearable.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)moondust
(19,988 posts)With demographics like that there would be virtually no political pressure on him to pander or do anything else to support minorities in order to win their votes. If anything, there could be some eye-rolling or even pressure on him to simply ignore minority issues and spend all his time working for the big majority.
He did it anyway, and that shows a lot of character.
Recommended.
cali
(114,904 posts)Most people really don't have a clue about Vermont.
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)They are disqualified because they don't understand the issues of white or brown America!
That's the logic spewed from the MSM
And it's exposed as total bullshit with even a micro second of thought....
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)some people do the right thing because its the right thing
the kind of people we need as president.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Like this state:
Home of this guy:
cali
(114,904 posts)But in 1988 it went for Jackson. In 2008 and 2012 it voted for Obama in greater percentages than any other state but Hawaii
Every county in Vermont voted for him. What does that say? It doesn't say that there isn't racism here. Of course there is, but it does say something.
jfern
(5,204 posts)So that was definitely with his help.
cali
(114,904 posts)We're you living here then?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Vermont was already liberal before he even moved there. Vermont doesn't have serious social or economic problems like many other states. Seems to me if he really wanted to help solve America's biggest problems he should have tried to run for a political office in a state like New York. It seems he took the easy and safe path to a political career.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)Are members of Congress supposed to tramp from state-to-state after having served a term in one state? Has there ever even been a US senator who served in two different states? And what would be different if Sanders served as US senator elected in NY state? Do NY-elected senators have some special extra power to "solve America's biggest problems" that senators elected in Vermont don't?
Probably the most convoluted, manufactured criticism of Sanders I've seen on these boards thus far -- and that's saying a lot.