Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 09:56 PM Aug 2015

Vermont electorate is 95% white

And if there's any "statistic" or "number" which can be cited as to why Bernie Sanders should be the next President of the United States, it's that.

Consider:

Would anyone disagree that, historically, a typical, garden-variety politician cynically caters only to those few big-money individuals and entities who can bankroll their elections, and will pander to those segments of the electorate whose votes they need to get/retain into office?

And that, historically, a typical garden-variety politician will likewise outright ignore those individuals whose money won't go his way and will similarly ignore -- or even be hostile to -- those segments of the electorate whose votes he doesn't need?

And is it agreed that if every single black, hispanic, and other minority member of Vermont's electorate were to have voted against Sanders in all his Congressional elections, it would not have made a bit of difference to his getting into office?

And yet, though Sanders has never needed Vermont's minority votes, he has spent his entire Congressional career with as sterling a record on civil rights as there is.

This type of politician is a dying breed in this nation: someone who actually gives a damn about everyone, regardless if they can help him get into office or not.

If there's a better measure of a candidate's fitness for the highest office in the land, I'd like to hear it.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vermont electorate is 95% white (Original Post) brentspeak Aug 2015 OP
Amazing as it seems to some, there are white progressives who really care about others..... peacebird Aug 2015 #1
Sometimes people do things because it's the right thing to do. Snotcicles Aug 2015 #3
i agree. nt DesertFlower Aug 2015 #8
Why is it overwhelmingly liberal then? Reter Aug 2015 #2
Bernie evolved them. nt Snotcicles Aug 2015 #4
VT was a liberal bastion way before Bernie. Why do you think Bernie moved there from Brooklyn?nt SunSeeker Aug 2015 #12
I don't know... some here would say GUNZ lol. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #13
Vermonters do love their GUNZ but I don't think that's why he moved there. SunSeeker Aug 2015 #14
I was being totally facetious. n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #15
I know. nt SunSeeker Aug 2015 #17
Not exactly jfern Aug 2015 #22
Vermont was the first state to outlaw slavery. it was Senator Aiken cali Aug 2015 #25
It has been a liberal refuge since the 1960s. SunSeeker Aug 2015 #28
But it voted Republican jfern Aug 2015 #29
Red rural areas had yet to be overwhelmed by all the Dems in the cities like Burlington. SunSeeker Aug 2015 #31
bullshit Bernie evolved us. cali Aug 2015 #20
Well, you might think that if you suppose that white people are somehow inherently right wing. sibelian Aug 2015 #27
I am sure that when Bernie was a kid in Brooklyn RoccoR5955 Aug 2015 #5
i'm almost 74. we lived in ridgewood, queens -- DesertFlower Aug 2015 #7
: ) peacebird Aug 2015 #26
Conservatives (at Fox Nation and at DU) don't believe white men can care about civil rights Doctor_J Aug 2015 #6
It gets really tiresome, doesn' it? Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #9
Good point. moondust Aug 2015 #10
actually there is. cali Aug 2015 #21
No super black majority black congressperson should ever run for POTUS musiclawyer Aug 2015 #11
as someone said upthread, restorefreedom Aug 2015 #16
We've had presidents from states that have been openly HOSTILE to minorities.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #18
Vermont is an odd duck. yes, it's overwhelmingly white cali Aug 2015 #19
Sanders endorsed Jackson in 1988 jfern Aug 2015 #23
it would have gone for him anyways. Sanders wasn't a statewide figure. cali Aug 2015 #24
But why did Bernie choose to remain in Vermont for essentially his entire political career?? DCBob Aug 2015 #30
Does that even make sense? brentspeak Aug 2015 #32

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. Amazing as it seems to some, there are white progressives who really care about others.....
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:01 PM
Aug 2015

Some of us have fought for equal rights for all, some of us have worked for justice for people of color, some of us believe we are all equal in worth. Bernie does too.

 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
3. Sometimes people do things because it's the right thing to do.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:15 PM
Aug 2015

Hopefully those of us who were brought up that way, can spot another from a mile away.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
2. Why is it overwhelmingly liberal then?
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:09 PM
Aug 2015

You would think that any place in America with a white population of 95% would be Tea Bag City.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
14. Vermonters do love their GUNZ but I don't think that's why he moved there.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:17 AM
Aug 2015

However, that is probably the reason he voted against the Brady Act.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
22. Not exactly
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:53 AM
Aug 2015

Until 1992, Vermont had voted Democratic once. and Leahy is still the only Democrat ever elected Senator from Vermont.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
25. Vermont was the first state to outlaw slavery. it was Senator Aiken
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:00 AM
Aug 2015

who said (to paraphrase) that we should declare victory in Vietnam and get out. It was Vermont Senator Ralph Flanders who took the lead against McCarthy. Vermont Senator Stafford was an early leader in the environmental movement. Both the Stafford Act and Stafford loans are named for him.

I could go on. In any case, Vermont has long been socially liberal and an environmentalist haven. We have come late to economic justice

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
28. It has been a liberal refuge since the 1960s.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:45 AM
Aug 2015

Starting in the early 1960s, liberals fleeing cities in NY and Mass tended to settle there (as opposed to NH, which attracted conservatives with its low taxes), resulting in Vermont electing its first Democratic governor in 100 years in 1963. That attracted even more liberals. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/01/new-vermont-is-liberal-but-old-vermont-is-still-there/

Bernie left Brooklyn for Vermont in 1968. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
31. Red rural areas had yet to be overwhelmed by all the Dems in the cities like Burlington.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:20 PM
Aug 2015

But eventually they were. Ford would be a Dem in today's world.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
27. Well, you might think that if you suppose that white people are somehow inherently right wing.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:34 AM
Aug 2015

But a cursory glance over the history of the world demonstrates a somewhat different picture and white Americans are no exception.

This idea that white people are inherently right wing is actually something of a Republicanism.
 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
5. I am sure that when Bernie was a kid in Brooklyn
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:31 PM
Aug 2015

he saw the plight of people of color, and decided that it was worth fighting for. I know the neighborhood that he lived in, and it is a very mixed area (at least it was 40 or more years ago, and Bernie is only a little older than I am).
He fought when he was in college in Chicago, and has not stopped.

And I would be so proud if a Brooklyn boy got the presidency. It's about time, as far as I'm concerned!

DesertFlower

(11,649 posts)
7. i'm almost 74. we lived in ridgewood, queens --
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:55 PM
Aug 2015

2 blocks from the brooklyn border. when i was a kid mom and i would take the bus to go downtown (fulton st.) shopping. the bus went through the african american neighborhoods. i remember my mom saying "colored people (that's what they were called back then) want the same thing for their families as white people do."

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
6. Conservatives (at Fox Nation and at DU) don't believe white men can care about civil rights
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:40 PM
Aug 2015

here they want so desperately to have a woman president that theyre willing to lie about a really good man, just to make their conservatism and cultism bearable.

moondust

(19,988 posts)
10. Good point.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:15 PM
Aug 2015

With demographics like that there would be virtually no political pressure on him to pander or do anything else to support minorities in order to win their votes. If anything, there could be some eye-rolling or even pressure on him to simply ignore minority issues and spend all his time working for the big majority.

He did it anyway, and that shows a lot of character.

Recommended.

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
11. No super black majority black congressperson should ever run for POTUS
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:29 PM
Aug 2015

They are disqualified because they don't understand the issues of white or brown America!

That's the logic spewed from the MSM


And it's exposed as total bullshit with even a micro second of thought....

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
16. as someone said upthread,
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:26 AM
Aug 2015

some people do the right thing because its the right thing

the kind of people we need as president.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
18. We've had presidents from states that have been openly HOSTILE to minorities....
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:05 AM
Aug 2015

Like this state:



Home of this guy:

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. Vermont is an odd duck. yes, it's overwhelmingly white
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:49 AM
Aug 2015

But in 1988 it went for Jackson. In 2008 and 2012 it voted for Obama in greater percentages than any other state but Hawaii
Every county in Vermont voted for him. What does that say? It doesn't say that there isn't racism here. Of course there is, but it does say something.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
24. it would have gone for him anyways. Sanders wasn't a statewide figure.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 06:14 AM
Aug 2015

We're you living here then?

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
30. But why did Bernie choose to remain in Vermont for essentially his entire political career??
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 09:02 PM
Aug 2015

Vermont was already liberal before he even moved there. Vermont doesn't have serious social or economic problems like many other states. Seems to me if he really wanted to help solve America's biggest problems he should have tried to run for a political office in a state like New York. It seems he took the easy and safe path to a political career.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
32. Does that even make sense?
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:23 PM
Aug 2015

Are members of Congress supposed to tramp from state-to-state after having served a term in one state? Has there ever even been a US senator who served in two different states? And what would be different if Sanders served as US senator elected in NY state? Do NY-elected senators have some special extra power to "solve America's biggest problems" that senators elected in Vermont don't?

Probably the most convoluted, manufactured criticism of Sanders I've seen on these boards thus far -- and that's saying a lot.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Vermont electorate is 95%...